RookieOfTheYear Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 i figured something like this would be cool to wear around this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 Pace yourself --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 Pace yourself lol. Yeah, not bad though On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthMan Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 eeeew. me no likee "We have nothing to fear except fear itself." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
officeglenn Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 I'm not feeling this trend I see of putting logos on the back of jerseys where the nameplate should go. If the Tigers want to use the All-Star Game logo as a sleeve patch, fine, but I don't think something like this will fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RookieOfTheYear Posted May 8, 2005 Author Share Posted May 8, 2005 i at least think the hat wood be pretty sweet if they wore it with a home jersey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 i at least think the hat wood be pretty sweet if they wore it with a home jersey um, no. Leave the Navy Hat with the Old English D with the Home Jersey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kansascityjayhawk4 Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 I like the jersey, though it may be a bit plain. Why not the All-Star logo on the sleeve instead of on the back and the hat?KC Jayhawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jWilson4mvp Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 The main hat logo shouldnt be the AS logo. Rah rah rah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RookieOfTheYear Posted May 8, 2005 Author Share Posted May 8, 2005 whatever, but hell i'd buy that hat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VitaminD Posted May 9, 2005 Share Posted May 9, 2005 Wow. 3 concepts in 1 evening. Quantity means nothing without quality.My thoughts:1. The hat is something they could sell to promote the All-Star Game, but it does not look like anything a major league team would wear during a game. It's a promotional item, and should remain that way.2. A small logo on the neck was a bad idea that some NBA teams started, and unfortunately it's spread to the Arizona Cardinals. But a logo that's as big as the numbers on the back (10" to 12", usually) is beyong jarring.3. The Tigers are a traditional team going back over 100 years. Your idea is awfully radical for baseball jerseys in general, let alone a team who is part of MLB's "old guard".And take the advice of the more senior members of the forum - don't respond to your own posts; it makes you look desperate. Be patient. You had the stones to put your creative efforts on display for all to see and critique - allow people to look on their own time. The responses will be there. One last thing: we all have our own biases and opinions. If your design doesn't appeal to some people, so be it. You don't have to agree with someone to get something useful out of what responses you get. This is a great place to get advice and get better. "Start spreading the news... They're leavin' today... Won't get to be a part of it... In old New York..."In order for the Mets' run of 12 losses in 17 games to mean something, the Phillies still had to win 13 of 17. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.