Jump to content

Las Vegas or Charlotte MLB uni challenge


Youppi!

Recommended Posts

If MLB did add teams in Las Vegas and Charlotte and they did go to eight four-team divisions, here's how I would align them.

American League

EAST

Balitmore

Boston

New York

Toronto

NORTH

Chicago

Cleveland

Detroit

Minnesota

SOUTH

Colorado

Kansas City

Tampa Bay

Texas

WEST

Las Vegas

Los Angeles

Oakland

Seattle

National League

EAST

New York

Philadelphia

Pittsburgh

Washington

NORTH

Chicago

Cincinnati

Milwaukee

St. Louis

SOUTH

Atlanta

Charlotte

Florida

Houston

WEST

Arizona

Los Angeles

San Diego

San Francisco

Your AL South Divison covers 3 different time zones, which causes many tv scheduling problems as well as possible travel problems (I don't know really with that one it just sounded intellectual to say), not to mention the fact that it covers almost 3/4 of the entire United States from east to west......and possibly north to south. Good ideas here, just need a little better planning and execution. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I like these divisions.

American League

West

Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

Seattle Mariners

Oakland Athletics

Kansas City Royals

Central

Chicago White Sox

Minnesota Twins

Detroit Tigers

Cleveland Indians

East

Toronto Blue Jays

New York Yankees

Boston Red Sox

Baltimore Orioles

South

Texas Rangers

Houston Astros

Arizona Diamondbacks

Oklahoma Pioneers (expansion)

National League

West

Los Angeles Dodgers

San Francisco Giants

San Diego Padres

Colorado Rockies

Central

Chicago Cubs

Cincinnati Reds

St. Louis Cardinals

Milwaukee Brewers

East

Pittsburgh Pirates

Philadelphia Phillies

New York Mets

Washington Nationals

South

Atlanta Braves

Florida Marlins

Tampa Bay Devil Rays

Carolina Blue Sox (expansion)

espnsig.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hey, I used to spend most of my time at other jobs, and at home for that matter, just coming up with realignment plans for MLB. I too think, based on team locations and just my curious imagination and not really on financial situations, that they should expand to 32 teams. My 2 choices in this one will be Portland and Las Vegas. I do have other concepts for other possible cities, too.

National League

East

NY Mets

Philadelphia

Pittsburgh

Toronto (not too crazy about this switch really, but oh well, just a concept)

South(east)

Atlanta

Florida

Tampa Bay (assuming they stay there)

Washington

Central

St. Louis

Chicago Cubs

Cincinnati

Milwaukee

West

LA Dodgers

Portland

San Diego

San Francisco

American League

East

Baltimore

Boston

Detroit

NY Yankees

Central

Chicago WS

Cleveland

Kansas City

Minnesota

South(west)[?]

Arizona

Colorado

Houston

Texas

West

Las Vegas

LA Angels (of Anaheim, <_< )

Oakland

Seattle

Never really had Toronto switching leagues before but I think Montreal's moving kinda threw me off with this one. Oh well, I'll try and fix it or just post another one another time, I don't really care. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no need for radical realignment of MLB. Seriously, who wants "East-West" conferences like the NBA and NHL, which don't have historic rivalries or significant regular seasons. I would just like to see the two leagues evened out at 15 and 15 with either Houston or Colorado moving over to the AL West. If the latter were to go, the Stros move into the NL West to replace them. This way, there are 6 5-team divisions. Sure, there would be an interleague game every day, but that's not a big deal. Additionally, you can drop the wild card in each league, have 3 teams make the playoffs with the top seed skipping the LDS. This way, the divisonal races are pure, and the best teams aren't immediately knocked out by a peaking team in a 5 game set. Every series should be 7. It just doesn;t make sense for a 162-game season to come down to 5. By the way, most of this is copied from Bob Costas' book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AL East.

New York

Baltimore

Boston

Washington

Tampa Bay

AL Central

Detroit

Cleveland

Chicago

Toronto

Minnesota

Kansas City

AL West

Oakland

Texas

Seatle

Los Angeles of Anaheim

Colorado

NL East

Atlanta

Philladelphia

Florida

New York

Pittsburg

NL Central

St. Louis

Cincinatti

Chicago

Houston

Millwaukee

NL West

Los Angeles

San Fransisco

San Diego

Arizona

The reason for 16 & 14 is so 2 teams don't have 3-4 days in a row off. Didn't want to disrupt traditional rivalries so I only moved teams who haven't been in the league that long. The exception is Pittsburg but I wanted them in the same division as the Phillies.

CanadiensBanners.jpg

banners-1-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, if we insist on expansion to 32 teams.

2 possible escenarios. First, 2 divisions with 8 teams each on each league:

AL East:

1.Baltimore

2.Boston

3.Cleveland

4.Detroit

5.New York Yankees

6.Tampa Bay

7.Toronto

8.Washington Senators (back where they belong)

AL West:

1.Chicago Sox

2.Kansas City

3.Los Angeles of Anaheim

4.Minnesota

5.Oakland

6.Portland (expansion)

7.Seattle

8.Texas

NL East:

1.Atlanta

2.Chicago Cubs

3.Florida

4.Milwaukee

5.New York Mets

6.Philadelphia

7.Pittsburgh

8.Saint Louis

NL West:

1.Arizona

2.Cincinnati

3.Colorado

4.Houston

5.Las Vegas (expansion)

6.Los Angeles of Hollywood

7.San Diego

8.San Francisco

That way, we'll have similarities with the old-era of 8 teams per league.

Another possible solution would be this:

AL Classic:

1.Baltimore (Browns)

2.Boston

3.Chicago Sox

4.Cleveland

5.Detroit

6.New York

7.Oakland (Philadelphia A's)

8.Washington (Senators)

AL Expansion:

1.Kansas City

2.Los Angeles of Anaheim

3.Minnesota (I know they were the Senators)

4.Portland (expansion)

5.Seattle

6.Tampa Bay

7.Texas

8.Toronto

NL Classic:

1.Atlanta (Boston/Milwaukee)

2.Chicago Cubs

3.Cincinnati

4.Los Angeles (Brooklyn)

5.Philadelphia

6.Pittsburgh

7.Saint Louis

8.San Francisco (NY Giants)

NL Expansion:

1.Arizona

2.Colorado

3.Florida

4.Houston

5.Las Vegas (expansion)

6.Milwaukee

7.New York Mets

8.San Diego

How about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if we insist on 8 divisions:

AL Classic East:

1.Baltimore (Browns)

2.Boston

3. New York

4. Washington

AL Classic West:

1.Chicago Sox

2.Cleveland

3.Detroit

4.Oakland (Philadelphia A's)

AL Expansion North:

1.Minnesota

2.Portland (expansion)

3.Seattle

4.Toronto

AL Expansion South:

1.Kansas City

2.Los Angeles of Anaheim

3.Tampa Bay

4.Texas

NL Classic East:

1.Atlanta (Boston/Milwaukee)

2.Philadelphia

3.Pittsburgh

4.Saint Louis

NL Classic West:

1.Chicago Cubs

2.Cincinnati

3.Los Angeles (Brooklyn)

4.San Francisco (NY Giants)

NL Expansion East:

1.Florida

2.Houston

3.Milwaukee

4.New York Mets

NL Expansion West:

1.Arizona

2.Colorado

3.Las Vegas (expansion)

4.San Diego

So, what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However you do it, the three-league solution is the only way to eliminate the wild card without going to ridiculous four-team divisions or going back to uncompetitive six- or eight-team divisions.

Why would four-team divisions be "ridiculous"? I think it would help competative imbalace...after all, a team would have a 1/4 chance of winning the division, which, even with escalating salaries in big markets, are still pretty good odds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 team divisions are never going to happen, because there's no way to separate Boston from New York, and that way only one of those 2 would be in the playoffs.

MLB-comissioner's dream would be to have Red Sox - Yankees as the ALCS and Cubs - Cardinals as the NLCS each and every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with mock re-alignment plans i've seen so far i have a question,what is the reasoning of moving Colorado in the AL and not Ariziona??

reason being is that Arizona is already setting up classic rivalries with teams like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. Colorado is struggling in a division with these 4 teams and a fresh start in the American League would help them with the Fresh Start

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However you do it, the three-league solution is the only way to eliminate the wild card without going to ridiculous four-team divisions or going back to uncompetitive six- or eight-team divisions.

Why would four-team divisions be "ridiculous"? I think it would help competative imbalace...after all, a team would have a 1/4 chance of winning the division, which, even with escalating salaries in big markets, are still pretty good odds.

One does tend to overstate one's case a bit online, but still, I do think four-team divisions would be a bad idea. It would just be silly to have so few teams competing for a pennant. All else being equal, there will be two teams above .500, two teams below, and the pennant will pretty much always be decided by early August. A fifth team throws a wrench in those works, making it more likely that one team will play the role of spoiler and keep the overall pennant race close into September. There are still runaway teams in the current five-team division structure, but that situation would be even more common if all divisions had only four teams.

20082614447.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hey, I used to spend most of my time at other jobs, and at home for that matter, just coming up with realignment plans for MLB. I too think, based on team locations and just my curious imagination and not really on financial situations, that they should expand to 32 teams. My 2 choices in this one will be Portland and Las Vegas. I do have other concepts for other possible cities, too.

National League

East

NY Mets

Philadelphia

Pittsburgh

Toronto (not too crazy about this switch really, but oh well, just a concept)

South(east)

Atlanta

Florida

Tampa Bay (assuming they stay there)

Washington

Central

St. Louis

Chicago Cubs

Cincinnati

Milwaukee

West

LA Dodgers

Portland

San Diego

San Francisco

American League

East

Baltimore

Boston

Detroit

NY Yankees

Central

Chicago WS

Cleveland

Kansas City

Minnesota

South(west)[?]

Arizona

Colorado

Houston

Texas

West

Las Vegas

LA Angels (of Anaheim, <_< )

Oakland

Seattle

Never really had Toronto switching leagues before but I think Montreal's moving kinda threw me off with this one. Oh well, I'll try and fix it or just post another one another time, I don't really care. B)

How can you put Portland and Seattle in opposite leagues?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fools! Why would you consciously try to eliminate one of the things that has helped baseball pull itself back together after the strike?!? Take away the wild card and the second half is largely pointless. I don't want North, South, East and West divisions. I don't care how perfect it is. You're probably the same people who want names off of the uniforms so they look "so clean!" No. If you absolutely have to go to 32 teams, which is such a very very bad idea, then go 5-6-5 in the AL like the NL does. People like the wild card, and might also be upset at one of their division rivals moving out.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would just like to see the two leagues evened out at 15 and 15 with either Houston or Colorado moving over to the AL West.
There's no need for radical realignment of MLB.

I see.

This way, there are 6 5-team divisions.  Sure, there would be an interleague game every day, but that's not a big deal.

Actually, yes. It's a scheduling nightmare. NOBODY UNDERSTANDS

Additionally, you can drop the wild card in each league, have 3 teams make the playoffs with the top seed skipping the LDS.

Yeah, we need more lame duck games in September. Good call.

This way, the divisonal races are pure, and the best teams aren't immediately knocked out by a peaking team in a 5 game set.  Every series should be 7.  It just doesn;t make sense for a 162-game season to come down to 5.

And somehow, 162-->7 is that much better than 5?

By the way, most of this is copied from Bob Costas' book.

I like Bob, but he's off on this one.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.