Roger Clemente Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 There is at least three things wrong with this, possibly more:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws....y=25004The thing with this jersey though is that an awful lot of effort had to go into making it (and the five others I found).--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Follow me on Twitter if you care: @Animal_Clans.My opinion may or may not be the same as yours. The choice is up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 1) looks like the old jersey with current nameplate2)appears to be silver # trim3)yougot me. i don't konw. A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 I can't see that well but how about no mesh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raz Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 wrong number font? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moser316 Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 1) Incorrect number trim/font (trim should be blue/white/silver if I'm not mistaken, font should be Pro Block -- but it doesn't look like the font the Leafs wear IRL)2) Incorrect collar (should be a Y-neck instead of the V-neck that's shown)3) Incorrect shoulder patch (should be the TML logo instead of the old detailed leaf) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spyboy1 Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 There is at least three things wrong with this, possibly more:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws....y=25004The thing with this jersey though is that an awful lot of effort had to go into making it (and the five others I found).--Roger "Time?" Clemente.Well, when they wore the shoulder logo pictured, they used a different number font.When they did use the number font shown, I think it was three colors - blue/white/silverIs the neckline also the wrong style?JeffB Click here to read Third String Goalie - The Hockey Jersey of the Day Blog Click here to see my hockey and baseball jersey collection online ?You don?t like to see 20 kids punching 20 other kids. But it?s not a disgrace, It?s hockey.? - Michael Farber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puckguy14 Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 Wrong number fontno white outline inbetween the silver and blue numeralsthe neck is V-neck not the Nike Y-neckno TML patch, the vintage leaf patch on the shoulder.can't think of the last one. 2004 San Jose Sharks 7th Man Fan of the Year San Jose Gold Miners - 4x Lombardi Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate15 Posted September 17, 2003 Share Posted September 17, 2003 CCM on the sleeve doesn't belong, does it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primal Posted September 18, 2003 Share Posted September 18, 2003 There is a CCM on the sleeve, but it should be in the blue cuff, not the white above it (I'm taking this from the official pic in the NHL Shop)Oh, and the stitching on the main logo looks different - more pronounced on the real jersey. Everything else as others have said - neck, shoulder logo, numbers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Clemente Posted September 18, 2003 Author Share Posted September 18, 2003 Here's all the things I noticed:1. Number font blatently wrong.2. CCM tag inside collar, below rear collar and left cuff introduced in 2001, jersey itself discontinued in 1998.3. Fluffy shoulder leaf discontinued before CCM started tagging like that.Also, the lettering on the front logo looks bigger than normal.--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Follow me on Twitter if you care: @Animal_Clans.My opinion may or may not be the same as yours. The choice is up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.