BucsBoy02 Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 I likes. Though I don't necessarily think the 'T' was needed to be added. Simply the 'H' and 'Texas' would be enough, because, as is, it's seems a little too elongated. But it's still nice.I totally agree, I think it would look better without the T.Without the T:Exactly what I was thinking. Though the state should be navy with a white star on both navy and white.Yeah, I agree. I don't know why I did that. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigEd76 Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 If you extend the right side of the "T", the overall design sorta resembles a gun... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 I likes. Though I don't necessarily think the 'T' was needed to be added. Simply the 'H' and 'Texas' would be enough, because, as is, it's seems a little too elongated. But it's still nice.I totally agree, I think it would look better without the T.Without the T:Exactly what I was thinking. Though the state should be navy with a white star on both navy and white.Yeah, I agree. I don't know why I did that. lolBingo! Now that's a nice secondary. https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 You could, at least in theory, put a 45-degree angled line from the center of the "H" to where it meets the top of the Texas graphic, thus creating "HT" all over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 That modified one is better, but the state still looks bizarre. There's something about the stylized angle that just doesn't work.Their toro logo works so well (easily one of the best new NFL logos in years), why dilute it with this garbage? The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedsunited Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Wow, that "HT" is incredibly amateurish. Looks like some trucking company logo.On a side note, I absolutely despise logos that include the initial for both city and team nickname (i.e. that stupid "DP" donkeypunch Detroit Pistons secondary). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chazberg Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 I like the T being included, here's what I'd do with it: charles-noerenberg.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 I like the T being included, here's what I'd do with it:That looks more like someone couldn't correctly spell the word 'hit'.And at first, this is how I pictured it should be, but now, seeing it, the 'T' needs to go. https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chazberg Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 I think the T balances it out better, without it the logo has too strong of a vertical orientation. charles-noerenberg.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 I think the T balances it out better, without it the logo has too strong of a vertical orientation.It doesn't seem too veritcal without it. Seems way to elongated with it, though. Plus, it just feels like the T is kind of off on it's own to the right, while everything else is on the left. (even though they're attached) https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.