nuordr Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 It would be nice if that template showed the full side of the pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted December 16, 2013 Author Share Posted December 16, 2013 It would be nice if that template showed the full side of the pants. Agreed, I wish his head was turned a little more so you can see the side better as well. I am gonna try my best to not let that affect the quality of the concepts though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisbadgers44 Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Love all of it, especially the ohio state black and UCF grey. Would love to see more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted December 28, 2013 Author Share Posted December 28, 2013 Did a few updates to the template to give a better view of the helmet and pants. Here is #25 USC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted December 28, 2013 Share Posted December 28, 2013 Did a few updates to the template to give a better view of the helmet and pants. Here is #25 USC.Great update on the template, and nice work on USC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS729 Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 UCF: Good start, I hate it when teams have a color in their name (I'm looking at YOU Texas Tech and Syracuse) and then completely neglect it for something else. But I'd like to see black be the second color here, and then the silver be an accent, I would like to see while instead of silver honestly, I don't see the purpose of adding a color to an already fine scheme. Ohio St: I don't like the font, it reminds me too much of those ugly pro combats they wore a few years ago. I also think you're overusing silver a bit on this one too, there's not enough red to stand out on the black alternate. USC: I like it. A modernizing of the jersey, not a crazy, bold, ugly re-design. Just an update to the times. Good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midway Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 UCF: Good start, I hate it when teams have a color in their name (I'm looking at YOU Texas Tech and Syracuse) and then completely neglect it for something else. Only Texas Tech started off as the Matadors, with the school athletics playing off their mascot's primarily black attire with red trim. (Which is mostly evident with the masked rider mascot to this day)The name was changed in 1936 by influence from a local writer who first dubbed the "Red Raiders" moniker but the school colors of scarlet and black have more or less shared equal status since the Matador days.It's very much similar to how the Blackhawks dont emphasize the color black since the name has its actual origin from something other than a literal "black hawk" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoknight Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 UCF: Good start, I hate it when teams have a color in their name (I'm looking at YOU Texas Tech and Syracuse) and then completely neglect it for something else. Only Texas Tech started off as the Matadors, with the school athletics playing off their mascot's primarily black attire with red trim. (Which is mostly evident with the masked rider mascot to this day)The name was changed in 1936 by influence from a local writer who first dubbed the "Red Raiders" moniker but the school colors of scarlet and black have more or less shared equal status since the Matador days.It's very much similar to how the Blackhawks dont emphasize the color black since the name has its actual origin from something other than a literal "black hawk"Good point, but why not just call TTU the "Raiders" and drop the red, then?It's not like there are an abundance of NCAA teams called Raiders, especially in FBS. 5th in NAT. TITLES | 2nd in CONF. TITLES | 5th in HEISMAN | 7th in DRAFTS | 8th in ALL-AMER | 7th in WINS | 4th in BOWLS | 1st in SELLOUTS | 1st GAMEDAY SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midway Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 In truth, what exactly a "Red Raider" actually is, is open to anyone's interpretation but by now it's been deeply ingrained in tradition and just has a nice ring to it. Hell, in the Leach era there was even a big pirate theme surrounding the nickname but despite these little quirks in history I've personally never had a problem with it in regards to the school's actual color scheme. But we digress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 UCF: Good start, I hate it when teams have a color in their name (I'm looking at YOU Texas Tech and Syracuse) and then completely neglect it for something else. Only Texas Tech started off as the Matadors, with the school athletics playing off their mascot's primarily black attire with red trim. (Which is mostly evident with the masked rider mascot to this day)The name was changed in 1936 by influence from a local writer who first dubbed the "Red Raiders" moniker but the school colors of scarlet and black have more or less shared equal status since the Matador days.It's very much similar to how the Blackhawks dont emphasize the color black since the name has its actual origin from something other than a literal "black hawk"Good point, but why not just call TTU the "Raiders" and drop the red, then?It's not like there are an abundance of NCAA teams called Raiders, especially in FBS. Because there are 14 or so other sports at TTU that wear red?Nothing wrong with adding a color adjective to make a nickname stand out against other similar names (Golden Panthers vs Panthers, Red Raiders vs Raiders, Green Wave vs Crimson Tide, etc).If a team wears colors that seem to go against the university's identity or nickname, that's more on that particular team and brand sponsor more than anything. Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted January 4, 2014 Author Share Posted January 4, 2014 Lets get this back on topic. Here are LSU, Missouri and UCLA. The away versions will be added to the first post of this thread to keep from cluttering it. Nothing too new with LSU and UCLA but that is due to how much I love their current uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted January 5, 2014 Author Share Posted January 5, 2014 Anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonderbread Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 mizzou is good except numbers have to contrast with the uniforms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 Did you really use Tennessee's number font for UCLA?Ohio State looks good except for the helmet stripes. Don't change the current helmet stripes.Don't take the Trojan off USC's helmet. The SC is not a better logo.The shadowed script UCLA logo is not better than the one-color version they use now. These are nice concepts, and you have talent, but they're not much better than anything currently in use. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted January 6, 2014 Author Share Posted January 6, 2014 Did you really use Tennessee's number font for UCLA?Ohio State looks good except for the helmet stripes. Don't change the current helmet stripes.Don't take the Trojan off USC's helmet. The SC is not a better logo.The shadowed script UCLA logo is not better than the one-color version they use now. These are nice concepts, and you have talent, but they're not much better than anything currently in use.- Is that not okay? Many teams use the same number font.- Agreed.- I always preferred the SC. The trojan just seems outdated.- Agreed, the shadow definitely doesn't fit in.Thanks, don't worry the designs are going to start getting more creative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Did you really use Tennessee's number font for UCLA?Ohio State looks good except for the helmet stripes. Don't change the current helmet stripes.Don't take the Trojan off USC's helmet. The SC is not a better logo.The shadowed script UCLA logo is not better than the one-color version they use now. These are nice concepts, and you have talent, but they're not much better than anything currently in use.- Is that not okay? Many teams use the same number font.True. It just looks odd and/or borrowed, especially with such a unique font.I like Missouri's look a lot, especially the more I look at it. It's one of those designs that if it was in use, would probably be copied by other non-SEC Tiger schools. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmac Posted January 10, 2014 Share Posted January 10, 2014 These are incredible. I don't like the striping choice for Ohio State but I'm in love with everything else. Stellar work. https://www.behance.net/bmatukewic8043 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmhtfld Posted January 12, 2014 Author Share Posted January 12, 2014 Updated the stripes for the Buckeyes, updated the top 25 list and finished Oregon.Home:Home 2:Away:Away 2:Away 3: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS729 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 I actually kind of like this one, the jersey looks good, the same ole' wings as before. Good helmet. And the pants actually have a wing design on them! Nice work, I also like sticking to school colors, Oregon is a prime example of BFBS and GFGS taking over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.