Sec19Row53

The eX-FL Football Conference

What did last year's look like?

The Brewers are (rumored to be) extending beer sales past the 7th inning. I bet they recognized that they'd leave more money on the table due to faster paced games.

5 wasn't an allowed number for wide receivers in 2020. It doesn't matter that someone else was wearing it.

Your answer is in your response, you just don't see it. You are in support of what you are used to. Beyond being used to it, it offers value in that, when you ARE used to it, you know the position of the player based on the number. Hey, 53 is covering 80. That's a mismatch. I get that not everyone does that, just like not everyone uses TV numbers to ID players. Because any one of us don't make use of a tool isn't a good enough reason to be opposed to it.

@LMU do you happen to have the link to this tweet? It was something like CommanderCorp_ - guessing it was deleted and that's why it's gone from here.

Eh - That's Badger basketball.

Calvin Ridley

I like the concept behind the Bills, but that logo is too detailed. I don't have an idea on how to cut it back, however.

Defense? Running game? There is no salary floor. Over a rolling 5 year period, teams have to spend a set percentage of the cap to comply. I think it's 85%. Maybe they don't spend it -- I don't know. The fact that they don't seem to run into cap hell might mean that they spend wisely, and aren't throwing big bucks around -- that's actually a sound plan.

Please name a successful WR who has developed in Baltimore. That might provide your answer. Baltimore's offense revolves around the running game, not the passing game. If you are a WR (and it should be unstated, but I'm saying it anyway) and want to catch 100 passes per year, that isn't the offense to showcase your skills.

CONFIRMED! https://northwoodsleague.com/lakeshore-chinooks/2023/03/27/one-weekend-only-chinooks-helicopter-alternate-identity/

The Cincinnati REDBLACKS

Interesting - I was thinking that was the sound of a sewing machine Good call!

I've heard of none of those people, but since you are reading this thread, we mentioned Benkert two pages ago. Oops - 3. New page with my reply

Yes

Not all of us if it's a good tournament.

Did you pick them to win it all two weeks ago? Yeah, that's how it goes.

Why was it a bull**** title run? Or does that just mean you didn't like it?

Yes. Left after 2004-5

That's not what you said. You said that would leave a bad taste. I'm saying it's a good game regardless of the teams. Show me a legitimate media presence saying what you *think* is the issue. I don't think it exists.

Don't assume your feelings are shared by everyone else. I'll take any two teams in a 4OT game in the tournament.

I'm not arguing with you, but I want to watch good, compelling basketball. The tournament has been that, but it could also have been that if it were bluebloods playing. These two are not mutually exclusive.

That was my point

"to get arrive"????