Jump to content

Sec19Row53

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,193

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Sec19Row53

  1. Sec19Row53
    The next time I fumigate my house and tear it down and rebuild it over the course of two years, your example will be valid. They haven't been home in the Bronx for 100 years. The patch is fine - this is the 100th anniversary of Yankee Stadium. how they presented it was the issue, because they haven't been in that home (Yankee Stadium in the Bronx) for 100 years
  2. Sec19Row53
    Counterpoint - the wordmark screams college and high school football. STATE TECH NORTH It isn't part of the NFL 'look'.
  3. Sec19Row53
    @Silent Wind of Doom rather than just giving me a facepalm, is Flushing in the Bronx? I don't know, because I don't know enough about New York to know. If it is, I have less an issue with it, If it isn't, then they clearly haven't been there for 100 years. Yes, it would still be the 100th anniversary of Yankee Stadium, but not their home for 100 years, since they didn't play in it for all of that time.
  4. Sec19Row53
    Visual
  5. Sec19Row53
    Was Shea Stadium in the Bronx? They played there for 2 years.
  6. Sec19Row53
    If it is ONLY the patch, it's ok, because the patch is correct. Given the way they unveiled it with '100 Years at home' is wrong, because they haven't been 'there' for '100' years.
  7. Sec19Row53
    It sort of IS one guy in New York, though. that's the problem. They try to run all replay through whoever that one person is at the moment (it was Alberto Riveron for a bit after Blandino left) in hopes of consistency. Assuming that two replays might happen at once, I'm sure there's some confusion and/or group talking that they wouldn't WANT to be heard. Keep in mind that this is an NFL function, not a TV function. FOX, ESPN, CBS, Amazon don't have their own replay 'decider', they just have their hired guns who say what they THINK the call ought to be.
  8. Sec19Row53
    It's way easier to do this when you don't have 8 games all kicking off at 1PM Eastern, and you can devote one person in charge of replay to only one game at a time.
  9. Sec19Row53
    I was at the Marriott. Took a hike there this morning. Also no clues spotted
  10. Sec19Row53
    Well, there are no spoilers in the Tucson airport. source - me right now
  11. Sec19Row53
    As the ball spins, that becomes a white circle, making it easier for the receiver to focus on the point of the ball.
  12. Sec19Row53
    I fly OUT of Tucson Wednesday. Missed it by *that* much
  13. Sec19Row53
    Per the twitterverse (and @TruColor) the unveiling is next Thursday https://www.compare.bet/en-us/news/sources-arizona-cardinals-expected-to-unveil-new-uniforms-on-april-20-at-the-van-buren-in-phoenix
  14. Sec19Row53
    No. Seriously. I liked both the Wranglers and Rattlers helmets.
  15. Sec19Row53
    This continues to make me cautiously optimistic of a copper colored helmet.
  16. Sec19Row53
    Sure, but unless it's the Cubs or Sox, I don't think people from Chicagoland are coming to Am Fam Field.
  17. Sec19Row53
    I'm hoping that this is the helmet that is the winner - something in a copper color. I've always liked that color since the Wranglers used it, followed up by the Rattlers.
  18. Sec19Row53
    If you gave the Nike-speak color names, would it be a problem? I'm thinking like your long ago game of Name that Color, where you would give us (for example) Safflower and we tried to ID the team and its color.
  19. Sec19Row53
    Looks like the Commanders
  20. Sec19Row53
    Nike Outlet isn't a thrift store, but I found this for $20
  21. Sec19Row53
    I searched for all the terms STOP REEL LINE MINT. It was in the NHL bad decisions thread
  22. Sec19Row53
    Found it!
  23. Sec19Row53
    Sort of how I feel about the whole situation
  24. Sec19Row53
    Urban Meyer levels of ignorance. You play that role if that's what suits you.
  25. Sec19Row53
    If you really don't know who Russell Okung is, you should never comment on anything involving the NFL again. I mean, he was no Ken Anderson, but still.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept