Phenomenal Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 If you look at the logos. You think to yourself: Were they drunk?They got this guy: He's gonna give little kids nightmare, he freaks me out a bit too. Why would they give a bull steroids and then make it play hockey wiht a huge whatever-that-is stuck to his hand?There's also:The Drunk Polar Bear. Why on earth did they think this would be a good idea? It's drunk, it's got a helmet on, you know someone is just gonna think: I wonder if they actually do look like that? And then they'll try it, and trust me, the outcome will be bad.Then we have:Mr. Ice Breaker. He looks like he wants to r*** me. Enough said.Someone forgot the colours when:I don't know if the whole no colour idea is supposed to make it look ancient and Rome like, but I have to admit, I sort of liked this logo.And we come to the most plain, boring, and, well, let's just say it's the only one that probably won't scare the :censored: out of someone:But while it won't creep people out, it will but them to sleep. How original of an idea is this? It's like the guy looked out the window, saw the flags blowing in the wind and said "Wow, those really blow together nicely, good enough for me", drew it and since no one else wanted this team to exist, they didn't create logos, that's why this bland thing was accepted. This post has been edited by zer0dotcom on some time in the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonz Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Man, those are really bad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankCostanza Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 It looks like that bull on steroids in the Toronto logo is curling. Another oddity, why was the Halifax team called the IceBreakers? Halifax Harbour does not freeze! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 You should've seen the rejected Toros logo... you'll shake your head a million times trying to figure out how they picked that over it. --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Clemente Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 At least it wasn't as phony as this was.--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Follow me on Twitter if you care: @Animal_Clans.My opinion may or may not be the same as yours. The choice is up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampman Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 You should've seen the rejected Toros logo... you'll shake your head a million times trying to figure out how they picked that over it. So I take it you doan't have a picture of it--or else are unable to share it. Comic Sans walks into a bar, and the bartender says, "Sorry, we don't serve your type here." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon_Matrix Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 You should've seen the rejected Toros logo... you'll shake your head a million times trying to figure out how they picked that over it. I liked the Detroit one...I remember some other Toro's one actually...it may have been the one you talk of...which I'd love to see to see if that was it. Because Korbyn Is Colour Blind, My Signature Is Now Idiot Proof - Thanks Again Braden!!Go Leafs Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frylock Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 You should've seen the rejected Toros logo... you'll shake your head a million times trying to figure out how they picked that over it. I agree with you, Chris. Those rejected Toros logos were pretty cool. My guess is that the team didn't have the money to pay for the work. Par for the course with the '04 WHA... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 The logos are a perfect reflection of how the rest of the league was operated: backwards and half-arsed. These dopes could have jumped in and established the WHA as a competitive league in 2004 in the NHL's absence. Instead, they stood around and soiled themselves. And I'm pretty sure that once we started seeing the logos on this board, the ineptitude of the league as a whole came as a surprise to no one. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon_Matrix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 You should've seen the rejected Toros logo... you'll shake your head a million times trying to figure out how they picked that over it. I agree with you, Chris. Those rejected Toros logos were pretty cool. My guess is that the team didn't have the money to pay for the work. Par for the course with the '04 WHA... The bottom logos look like someone got themselves a Prince Albert. Because Korbyn Is Colour Blind, My Signature Is Now Idiot Proof - Thanks Again Braden!!Go Leafs Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.