nuordr Posted November 1, 2011 Share Posted November 1, 2011 What I do wish, though, is that the navy was a little bolder, the gold a good bit richer. It may just be the EJD lighting, or maybe I'm just getting old, but it seemed to me that the Rams' navy and gold were much richer in appearance when this current identity first came out in 2000. Not sure if they tweaked their colors over the years or not (paging ColorWerx!), but the navy and vegas definitely appear much too muted and drab now.I agree with you - the Rams' current color scheme used to stand out more. In particular, the gold seems to have gotten lighter and less metallic:2000 (first year with current color scheme):I cannot believe I never realized the gold stripe was missing on their uniforms today. I like these a lot better than what they are wearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake22 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Is that a massive tear in his jersey? THE ROCKIES STIRRUP PROJECTPart 1, Part 2...Oregon Duck Tracker 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 I agree with you - the Rams' current color scheme used to stand out more. In particular, the gold seems to have gotten lighter and less metallic:2000 (first year with current color scheme):Not that it makes the least bit of difference, but that pic is from 2001 or 2002. Note the updated font, and the Reebok logos on the Proehl's sleeve and Faulk's leg. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 I agree with you - the Rams' current color scheme used to stand out more. In particular, the gold seems to have gotten lighter and less metallic:2000 (first year with current color scheme):Not that it makes the least bit of difference, but that pic is from 2001 or 2002. Note the updated font, and the Reebok logos on the Proehl's sleeve and Faulk's leg.The authentic jersey from those years looked amazing in person. TV never did them justice.BTW, loving those 49ers uni's in the background too. The T.O. era for the Niners had great uniforms. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John in KY Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 I agree with you - the Rams' current color scheme used to stand out more. In particular, the gold seems to have gotten lighter and less metallic:2000 (first year with current color scheme):Not that it makes the least bit of difference, but that pic is from 2001 or 2002. Note the updated font, and the Reebok logos on the Proehl's sleeve and Faulk's leg.It would have to be 2001 - they took the side panels off for 2002. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Rams should just go back to basics and while they're at it, come back to LA This pic reflects the game perfectly...pretty much all Rams. What about the Gabriel-era blue and white unis but with thin yellow trim on the horns, numbers, and stripes? Of course, we'd end up with 4-inch "stripes" on the shoulders (a la Colts) but what can you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.