lionfan88 Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a53/lionf...eatlejersey.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionfan88 Posted August 17, 2005 Author Share Posted August 17, 2005 please reply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 interesting. good execution. i dont love the overall design though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiodrama Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 Nottt a good idea to post again with "please reply" 4 minutes after your original post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OB33 Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 My only gripe is that the shoulder patch doesn't fit in with the rest of the concept. But this is a good concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VitaminD Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 My only gripe is that the shoulder patch doesn't fit in with the rest of the concept. But this is a good concept. This is the latest in what is becoming a disturbing trend.You used a wordmark from one uniform. You used a cap logo from a 2nd uniform set. You then added a sleeve patch containing a logo from a 3rd uniform.The M's never used any of these with any of the others. Why? Because a uniform and identity package should give a sense of a consistent look. At this point, you may as well stuff a teal and silver nautical compass on the other sleeve to represent EVERY uniform Seattle's worn since 1977.Cramming as many uniform and design elements from various eras and juxtaposing them does not make for a good concept.I'm sorry, and I don't want to be too harsh, but this is the 6th or 7th concept that has come along in the last month where someone combined various logos from a team's past without much consideration for the fact that those logos were not intended to be worn with each other. Honestly, it looks like no one paid attention while making this. And no one made any attempt to make these discordant designs look more like each other (reshaping one of the tridents, making sure the outlining was consistent, etc.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epiphanic Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 In all honesty I don't think it looks that bad. But I do agree with VitaminD. Mixing and Matching historical logos is just asking for trouble. Is this concept for actual use? Or just for looksies? There is/was a thread on these boards referencing an article about the inverted trident logo. It's bad luck. Anyway, I'll give you props on the effort. But for next time try to keep your concepts with one identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brass Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Doesn't work for me. All 3 logos from different times are killing me! Stick to 1 or 2 logos, but not 3. And tone down the yellow a tad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMU Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 I agree with all comments, and please use image tags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HatCityEnforcer Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 I agree with all comments, and please use image tags. I'm in agreement as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rvieth07319 Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 its the worst i have seen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brass Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 its the worst i have seen Actually, this one kicks your National's concept out of the water! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-kj Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 I edited the title for you. Please, everyone, please make your topic titles descriptive as to what you will find in the topic. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 It's really not a good look, unless you're into gawdy 70s styles. Realistically, the Mariners wouldn't go back to a uniform with elements from a losing era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huskyfan82 Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Don't like it. Being an M's fan, I want all the lousy blue and yellow logos to burn in you know where, lol.David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.