Jump to content

Washington Redskins


jgsmith725

Recommended Posts

Looks like just a generic Nike design from niketeam.com with Redskins colors.

"Classic" can sometimes backfire and mean "unoriginal." It's not a bad design, it looks nice, but it's still just a Redskins-colored Nike template.

And, as usual, if you're going to change up the Redskins design, I'm always in favor of dropping the racist head logo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad for the templete you were using, but I honestly think the Redskins should have stuck with their home throwbacks with the spear. I thought those looked much better than what they have now, and were less offensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you Native American? No? Then be quiet.

Calm it down. No need to be rude.

Here we go, the PC debate again.

The name is rude and far from politically correct. I'm not quite seeing what's wrong with the logo?

It's a deptiction of an obviously Native American male, wearing feathers. Is there something that's incorrect or inappropriate with the depiction? It looks like something out of a modern, PC American history textbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a deptiction of an obviously Native American male, wearing feathers. Is there something that's incorrect or inappropriate with the depiction? It looks like something out of a modern, PC American history textbook.

Is anything wrong with the logo? Not in my opinion.

The logo is very classy, dignified even...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's stick to the uniform concept, gents... the PC merits of the name, logo and/or uniforms of the Redskins has been done to death and back again.

PANTS: A+. Look great.

SOCKS: Incomplete. I am hoping you'll use the white socks with the 2 stripes for all uniforms. The all-maroon socks look ridiculous. As much as I hate the Redskins, I always liked their socks.

JERSEYS: B-. I have always been a huge fan of the UCLA-style striping, but it doesn't quite fit the Redskins' look. The helmet presently has 5 stripes; your concept appears to have 2 stripes - which would be assymetrical. I remember when UVa tried it, and (U of) Arizona as well. It looked OK, definitely memorable. But I don't know if it'd work in the NFL. However, if the helmet has 2 stripes, and the pants have 2 stripes, and the socks (might) have 2 socks, the jerseys would look very strange having 3 stripes around the shoulders.

As for the gold alternates, there aren't a lot of teams that pull off that color well as the body for a football jersey. The maroon and the white work really well on their own, and I don't see Gibbs being a big alternate jersey fan.

OVERALL: I like this set more than I thought I did. Well done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, as usual, if you're going to change up the Redskins design, I'm always in favor of dropping the racist head logo.

The logo isn't racist, the name is

completely agreed.

i still say that if they changed their team name to warriors, they could keep their logos, uniforms, and everything... and then i wouldn't hate the team :) i'd probably buy a jersey.

the logo has a chicago blackhawks quality of respectfulness to it... it's just that damn name.

and i'm an 1/8 too... the son of a card carrying member of the creeks of alabama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.