NJTank Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 That should be their logo its terrific Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 That should be their logo its terrific That's what I was thinking. I like how it incorporates some of the elements of the Arizona state flag (one of the best state flags). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logodawg Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 There's been a lot of talking, but has anyone actually contacted Greg about? I am interested in what his reaction would be. If it was me, I don't think that I would sue if someone just found it online and made it out of ice, but it would be a different story if they got credit for it and receive any comp as a result. Something like this would be an open-and-shut case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeaks4 Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 It sucks that he got ripped off, but I just have to say, that is the best logo I have EVER seen...I might actually show an intrest in my hometown team if they had a logo that nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 Sure, it's a great logo but is anyone else distrubed by the lack of legs on the cardinal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJTALBOT Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 For the record, the Winter Blast, where the sculptures were displayed, was free and open to the public. If you wanted to sue, what could you ask for? They didn't make any money on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 I'm pretty confident some ice sculptor made money carving it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meetthemets Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 But he would have been paid if he used the regular Cardinals logo. I guess I just don't understand the benefit of him using this logo as opposed to the other one. That's why I think he could have been confused. Why use all the other NFL logos and then that one for the Cards? It doesn't make any sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtrich11 Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 It must be almost refreshing to Nitro (Brad) that someone DIDN'T rip off his famous Cardinal head logo for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 But he would have been paid if he used the regular Cardinals logo. I guess I just don't understand the benefit of him using this logo as opposed to the other one. That's why I think he could have been confused. Why use all the other NFL logos and then that one for the Cards? It doesn't make any sense. Well, I don't know if it was his call or the event's decision, but somebody has no clue about sports. Either way, the sculptor accepted money for representing artwork that was neither his nor the NFL's. If he got permission, then that's all right, but if not, the ice sculptor used someone else's work, and got paid for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.