Dave Ship Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 Green Bay Packers uniform concept.- a very conservative look for one of the oldest and most glorious franchise of the NFL history;- added two very thin lines at the edge of the main stripe on the shoulders;- brand new design of the seams on the chest;- new kind of green;- added a third kit with a special gold instead of the traditional yellow. My PicturesMy Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chestnutz Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 Not much different, but it's incredible. erikas | go birds | dribbble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDubK414 Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 Very cool design. I could actually see this as something of the future if they would decide to change up things. It probably wouldn't ruffle to many feathers around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottysprings Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 These look great, glad to see concepts from you again.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesR5767 Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 Solid, solid design. I think it would work for the Packers, and this is coming from a Cowboys fan, too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BJBerthiaume Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 Very nice I would like to see some other teams! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiK Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 I like the slight modernization on the first twobut i don't like the "gold." reminds me of Ron Wolf's failed golden disaster. 73, 77, 81, 83, 90, 06 29, 30, 31, 36, 39, 44, 61, 62, 65, 66, 67, 96, 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsfan1 Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 Sometimes, just an extra stripe or an extra wordmark can be the difference between an average and a great jersey. Very nice.Changes? I don't like the third. Make a throwback version instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckymack Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 I like everything you've done. My only suggestion is to add the thin stripes to the helmet and pants. Sigs are for sissies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 It holds true to tradition, but I have a few comments. First, the G logo looks odd on the front of the home jersey. I would prefer PACKERS on the front with the G on the back above the name (that is if you use this design element), staying consistent on both the home and away jerseys. Second, the solid collar color is reminiscent of the cheap discount jerseys sold locally. Third, I like the alt sleeve from what I can see but your concept should have a larger detailed version for evaluation. The alt gold doesn't work well. I would go with a gold more towards a richer old gold color or try a new striping scheme on white pants. "One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Ship Posted September 27, 2008 Author Share Posted September 27, 2008 It holds true to tradition, but I have a few comments. First, the G logo looks odd on the front of the home jersey. I would prefer PACKERS on the front with the G on the back above the name (that is if you use this design element), staying consistent on both the home and away jerseys. Second, the solid collar color is reminiscent of the cheap discount jerseys sold locally. Third, I like the alt sleeve from what I can see but your concept should have a larger detailed version for evaluation. The alt gold doesn't work well. I would go with a gold more towards a richer old gold color or try a new striping scheme on white pants.I'll try to work out better with the collar. About the logo position, I don't like your idea about the G near the name because of style and tradition. About the details, well, I don't know if you're a pro-designer or what but for previous personal experiences I'm not gonna show off my technical design on a board. If you mean just a little bit larger, I can sort it out something.Thanks for the feedback, though. Love your sig. My PicturesMy Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted September 27, 2008 Share Posted September 27, 2008 I don't normally care for the logo over the name either. My point was if you need to include the logo, it works better over the name than on the front where the wordmark would go. Also, I wasn't asking for how you did the alt sleeves or their files. I think it would be easier to evaluate if we get to see the entire sleeve instead of just 1/2 of it. That's all.I liked the sig cartoon also. "One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Ship Posted September 28, 2008 Author Share Posted September 28, 2008 As requested, here's a modern throwback version of my Green Bay concept.quantum: a little update of the collar. I tried several combination of stripes but no one satisfied me. So I thought to edit the shape of the collar, well I'm quite glad about what has come out. My PicturesMy Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 Longstanding gripe - if you have to place the team's logo or wordmark on the front of the jersey so that people know who they are, you haven't done your job as a designer. Take that away and the design is solid. It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake22 Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 love the first post, just amazing.Longstanding gripe - if you have to place the team's logo or wordmark on the front of the jersey so that people know who they are, you haven't done your job as a designer. Take that away and the design is solid.bull, having your name on the front means alot to many people. solod designs includ things like this.think of high schools and collagesplease THE ROCKIES STIRRUP PROJECTPart 1, Part 2...Oregon Duck Tracker 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fkaKrock5cent Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 Longstanding gripe - if you have to place the team's logo or wordmark on the front of the jersey so that people know who they are, you haven't done your job as a designer. Take that away and the design is solid.I 100% disagree. The logos on the front make the jersy look like it was made for the team wearing them and not some low budget high school (excuse throwbacks) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 The new collar treatment works better than before. The throwbacks look solid. "One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 Longstanding gripe - if you have to place the team's logo or wordmark on the front of the jersey so that people know who they are, you haven't done your job as a designer. Take that away and the design is solid.I don't think a designer has to include it. However, it is a concept. Since nothing else was added, there wouldn't be much point in posting. After all, it is a concept, not an exercise in replication. "One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 Good stuff here, Davide!This here is real conservative, even by your standards--but this is the Packers here, so that's understandable. I actually rather like that "special gold" edition--would like it even better if the gold was a richer "old gold" as someone suggested. But that sleeve idea is a nice one! And those throwbacks are true hotness. Love them.I see you've changed up your display layout, as well. I'm liking that, as well. *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Ship Posted September 28, 2008 Author Share Posted September 28, 2008 Good stuff here, Davide!This here is real conservative, even by your standards--but this is the Packers here, so that's understandable. I actually rather like that "special gold" edition--would like it even better if the gold was a richer "old gold" as someone suggested. But that sleeve idea is a nice one! And those throwbacks are true hotness. Love them.I see you've changed up your display layout, as well. I'm liking that, as well.What about this? The only difference between these two version is the G logo on the pants. Plus a monochrome madness. My PicturesMy Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.