NJTank Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 http://sportsecyclopedia.com/tank/NHL2010/nhl10playoffsrd1.htmlComments and your picks www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 None of the series go the full seven? Lame.Plus, you have San Jose breezing through the first round, and, well, that's just not going to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 There is no such word as "allot". Hell - combining "a" and "lot" would get you "alot", which, while still wrong, at least has the right amount of letters. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JACK IS CONSTRUCTION Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 There is no such word as "allot". Hell - combining "a" and "lot" would get you "alot", which, while still wrong, at least has the right amount of letters.Camelot sounds like cam allot, so that's kind of close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eye Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 There is no such word as "allot". Hell - combining "a" and "lot" would get you "alot", which, while still wrong, at least has the right amount of letters.Actually, allot is a word; however, in this case, I'm pretty sure that "a" and "lot" were being combined for some f-ed up reason. So yeah, I agree with everything in your post except the first sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMMF Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 There is no such word as "allot".Uhh, yes there is. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/allot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninersdd Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 Since South Park is in Colorado, I will just say this: The Avs will play the role of Kenny this series BEAR DOWN ARIZONA!2013/14 Tanks Picks Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 There is no such word as "allot". Hell - combining "a" and "lot" would get you "alot", which, while still wrong, at least has the right amount of letters.Actually, allot is a word; however, in this case, I'm pretty sure that "a" and "lot" were being combined for some f-ed up reason. So yeah, I agree with everything in your post except the first sentence.There is no such word as "allot".Uhh, yes there is. http://www.merriam-w...ictionary/allotWell I'll be. I've read / used "allotted" before, but for some reason never realized that the root was allot. Either way, it still makes no sense to use it there. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 No real upsets here, not even the Wings over the Yotes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted April 29, 2010 Author Share Posted April 29, 2010 Round TwoSecond Round Preview Stanley Cup PlayoffsComments and your picks? www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brass Posted April 29, 2010 Share Posted April 29, 2010 Well, I wouldn't really say that Zdeno Chara is the deciding factor for the Bruins. Tuukka Rask is probably better suited for that title. On 4/10/2017 at 3:05 PM, Rollins Man said: what the hell is ccslc? Β Β Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philly97flyer Posted April 29, 2010 Share Posted April 29, 2010 Chara is a deciding factor in the series, so what does that make Pronger? Not to rip your picks, just curious about your logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninersdd Posted April 29, 2010 Share Posted April 29, 2010 Since 04 Tank has picked the Sharks 9 of 12. The first two he picked against us, we won(He said Blues in 6 in 04 quarters, we won in 5, and in the semis that year, he had Avs in 7, where we won in 6). The Sharks are 4-5 in series he expects them to win, but like I said 2-0 when losses are expected. Hopefully that trend continues. BEAR DOWN ARIZONA!2013/14 Tanks Picks Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted April 29, 2010 Share Posted April 29, 2010 Just wondering, how many times were the paragraphs proofread before posting them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted April 29, 2010 Share Posted April 29, 2010 My second round picks....Eastern Conference4) Pittsburgh Penguins vs. 8) Montreal Canadiens - Penguins in 66) Boston Bruins vs. 7) Philadelphia Flyers - Flyers in 7Western Conference1) San Jose Sharks vs. 5) Detroit Red Wings - Red Wings in 52) Chicago Blackhawks vs. 3) Vancouver Canucks - Blackhawks in 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted May 15, 2010 Author Share Posted May 15, 2010 Conference FinalsComments and your picks www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coast2CoastAM2006 Posted May 15, 2010 Share Posted May 15, 2010 Conference FinalsComments and your picksHabs and Hawks. book it. Spoilers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korbyn Posted May 15, 2010 Share Posted May 15, 2010 Tank your batting .500 with a record of 6-6 this post season, after going the last round 1-3. You have also only correctly predicted one series, when you said the Canucks would beat the Kings in 6.I really hope your not putting an money down on these games! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted May 15, 2010 Share Posted May 15, 2010 but when Evgeni Nabokov is on top of his game he is one of the top net minders in the league.Not sweatin' this aspect too much. Everybody is a top netminder in the league when on one's game; that's kinda how goaltending works. Nabokov gets just as flustered with heavy screening as Luongo does, but there's much less to screen with Nabokov than Luongo. Additionally, Nabokov has proven quite capable of making poo pants in big situations, like the Olympics, the game against the Wings last round, the game against these Blackhawks last November, and years and years of San Jose playoff appearances. Suddenly we're up against Evgeni Dryden here with the way some people are talking this guy up. β« oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is goneΒ β« Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted May 28, 2010 Author Share Posted May 28, 2010 Here it is the Stanley Cup Finals PreviewStanley Cup FinalsComments and your picks www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.