bbb Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 Here's an idea for a realignment like the nhl (more or less). l'll do also new teams logos and jerseys http://s1061.photobucket.com/user/leodari/media/NEWnflteams_map_zps97a6492b.png.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted March 19, 2014 Author Share Posted March 19, 2014 let me know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elwood From Canada Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 I like it for the most part. you shouldn't have a team in mexico city. Football wouldn't catch on there. I suggest a team for the dakotas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted March 19, 2014 Author Share Posted March 19, 2014 ok one team for north and south dakota like for carolina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbaker19 Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 Not a fan of your realignment. The NFC North has a bunch of rivalries that have gone on for years and yet you split them up? No thanks. Thanks Dolphins91 for the jersey avatars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derschwigg Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 It's a nice idea, but you wind up losing too many rivalries. Why not keep the West Coast as one conference without moving the Rams? Arizona's already right there.EDIT: What you're really proposing is four new teams. You could go 8, one for each existing division, and wouldn't have to realign anything. My Portfolio | My Store | My Self Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDGP Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 I agree that the NFC Central and the AFC central don't make much sense. Both geographically and historically, it would work better if Minnesota and Detroit stayed in the NFC and keeping the Steelers and Browns in the AFC.Also not a huge fan of Dallas in the AFC, just doesn't seem right to me. I also don't like that the Chargers or the Raiders, founding members of the AFL and AFC are being moved to the NFC. I've got a dribbble, check it out if you like my stuff; alternatively, if you hate my stuff, send it to your enemies to punish their insolence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozloya Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 seriously?Mexico City Parrots?might as well name them Aztecas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted March 19, 2014 Author Share Posted March 19, 2014 http://s1061.photobucket.com/user/leodari/media/NEWnflteams_mapupdate_zpsbc25e080.png.htmlupdate: no mexico city but dakota, unbroken rivalries and teams in their original conference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 I like derschwigg's idea as well.AFC North:BengalsBrownsSteelersRavensToronto*AFC East:BillsDolphinsJetsPatriotsAlbany (NY)*AFC South:ColtsJaguarsTitansTexansArkansas*AFC West:BroncosChargersChiefsRaidersNevada*NFC North:BearsLionsPackersVikingsSouth Dakota*NFC East:CowboysEaglesGiantsRedskinsSouth Carolina*NFC South:BuccaneersFalconsPanthersSaintsOklahoma*NFC West:49ersCardinalsRamsSeahawksNebraska** = denotes expansion team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted March 19, 2014 Author Share Posted March 19, 2014 good idea dan sports l'll update tomorrowdan sports sorrythe corrector corrects me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chibimatty Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 Interesting stuff, will you modify the play-offs or keep the conferences? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted March 19, 2014 Author Share Posted March 19, 2014 l'll keep the same playoffs formatbut dnasports l'll keep calgary and l won't add nebraska for nfc west Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle98 Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 I think Mexico City is a much better choice than the Dakotas. The couple of exhibition games in Mexico City have set NFL attendance records. Besides, the entire population of both Dakotas combined is 1.5 million. That would mean that 1 out of every 20 people in the both states would have to come to the games in order to fill up a 75,000 seat stadium. Realistically, there's no way you're going to see that. I feel like Portland and Salt Lake City would both be much better markets.I'm interested to see how this pans out. "Jesus said to him, 'I am the way, and the truth, and the life.'" - John 14:6"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." - John 3:16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FALCON6 Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 seriously?Mexico City Parrots?might as well name them Aztecas.Parrots is great. Nice name bbb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1clkgtramg Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 I'm sorry but having a Team in Toronto and Calgary, while removing a team in St. Louis doesnt make sense to me. Leave Canada out of it just to be safe. We have our CFL, 2 NFL teams coming in (especially one replacing the oldest professional sports team in North America, the Toronto Argonauts) would screw up a lot of things. A team in Monterrey Mexico may be a better choice than Mexico City. Calgary's team should be either Las Vegas or Portland. Oklahoma is Fine, Toronto's team should move to Quebec City if you really want to include Canada in it. US and World License Plate Redesign - Fixing the Elite Ice Hockey League - NHL to Soccer Crossover - European Hockey League Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chibimatty Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 Yeah, I reckon leaving Canada out might be a good idea too. If I was to be really ridiculous, I reckon England and Germany would be awesome teams in the NFL in a fantasy world! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted March 20, 2014 Author Share Posted March 20, 2014 What about this? AFC North:BengalsBrownsSteelersRavensColumbus* AFC East:BillsDolphinsJetsPatriotsAlbany (NY)* AFC South:ColtsJaguarsTitansTexansMexico City* AFC West:BroncosChargersChiefsRaidersNevada* NFC North:BearsLionsPackersVikingsNebraska* NFC East:CowboysEaglesGiantsRedskinsOrlando* NFC South:BuccaneersFalconsPanthersSaintsOklahoma* NFC West:49ersCardinalsRams (Los Angeles)SeahawksOregon* *expansion teamswell, l'll try with the teams l said before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted March 20, 2014 Author Share Posted March 20, 2014 maybe it's better a team in virginia than one in orlando Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 Orlando is better than Virginia. I'm not sold on Mexico City... put a team back in St. Louis or in that general area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.