eddie010 Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 TSN.ca StoryHmm, sounds interesting. I'd personally love to have it in the T.Dot, and I'd try my best to attend, but I'm not sure if many Canadians are that interested in NCAA football, let alone the teams participating. But if it can pump $15 million into the city's economy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Canada is interested in the NCAA, at least the Greater Toronto Area is -- I suppose it depends on the teams playing... hopefully they get at least one shot so we can gauge interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yh Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 This is a slam dunk, if ever there was one. In general, the NCAA will sanction a bowl game for at least one year so long as it comes to the table with the support of at least one conference. As long as there will be 6-5 or 6-6 teams, especially schools that may not necessarily get to bowl games with any frequency, there will be a market for as many bowl games as there are qualifying teams. In this particular case, using conferences with a number of schools in the great lakes region or reasonably close thereto gives the game a decent chance of drawing a crowd that just might float the costs and maybe turn a reasonable profit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 How many NCAA schools are in Canada, exactly?Though I'd be in favor of it, my guess is this doesn't fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 This is a slam dunk, if ever there was one. In general, the NCAA will sanction a bowl game for at least one year so long as it comes to the table with the support of at least one conference. As long as there will be 6-5 or 6-6 teams, especially schools that may not necessarily get to bowl games with any frequency, there will be a market for as many bowl games as there are qualifying teams. In this particular case, using conferences with a number of schools in the great lakes region or reasonably close thereto gives the game a decent chance of drawing a crowd that just might float the costs and maybe turn a reasonable profit. so in other words, welcome Eastern Michigan and Buffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakwood Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 How many NCAA schools are in Canada, exactly?Though I'd be in favor of it, my guess is this doesn't fly. I think theres one or two, Simon Fraser and Trinity Western both play in Division 3 I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 How many NCAA schools are in Canada, exactly?Though I'd be in favor of it, my guess is this doesn't fly. I think theres one or two, Simon Fraser and Trinity Western both play in Division 3 I think. no, no both are part of the CIS. Although, Simon Fraser were part of the NAIA but went to the CIS a few years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appleclock Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Simon Fraser played lower division football (probably Division III) against NCAA schools in the 1990s. I don't think they were an actual NCAA member, however. Simon Fraser plays Canadian Football now in the Canada West.I also think Calgary at one point tried to get a Division I game to be played at McMahon Stadium about a decade ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thad Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 maybe change the lowest bowl for both the Big 11 and the MAC that would give some "regionality" to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yh Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 This is a slam dunk, if ever there was one. In general, the NCAA will sanction a bowl game for at least one year so long as it comes to the table with the support of at least one conference. As long as there will be 6-5 or 6-6 teams, especially schools that may not necessarily get to bowl games with any frequency, there will be a market for as many bowl games as there are qualifying teams. In this particular case, using conferences with a number of schools in the great lakes region or reasonably close thereto gives the game a decent chance of drawing a crowd that just might float the costs and maybe turn a reasonable profit. so in other words, welcome Eastern Michigan and Buffalo No, silly. They're in the same conference.And they suck.Think Syracuse - Toledo or UConn - Cincinnati Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilbert Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 Think Syracuse - Toledo or UConn - Cincinnati Syracuse- Toledo would workUConn-Cincinnati would NOT work because UC is joining the Big East this summer.Ha! Pardon me for laughing at the fact of UC playing in a bowl game in Toronto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjrbaseball Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 An aside question:Do Canadian colleges play football under rules similar to the CFL, or similar to NCAA rules? Or do they have their own set of rules? (I mean, what size field, how many players, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakwood Posted April 16, 2005 Share Posted April 16, 2005 the CIS uses CFL rules 110 yards 3 downs 12 players etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMMF Posted April 17, 2005 Share Posted April 17, 2005 When this topic first came up in October, it was discussed here. I still think it's a bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.