cajunaggie08 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 This is an email that was sent to members and supporters of Texas A&M University.8 May 2006MEMORANDUMTo: Texas A&M Students, Faculty and StaffSubject: 12th Man Trademark Settlement I?m pleased to inform you that, after months of negotiations, the university has reached an amicable agreement with the Seattle Seahawks resolving the controversy regarding the use of Texas A&M?s 12th Man trademark. Under the agreement, the university has granted the NFL team a license to use the 12th Man trademark in a seven-state area in the northwest that encompasses the current primary broadcast area of the Seahawks. As is the case of all licensees, the Seattle Seahawks will pay the university a licensing fee and will state publicly that Texas A&M owns the 12th Man trademark each time it is used. It is hard for non-Aggies?and the media?to understand the depth of what the 12th Man reference and depiction?and the underlying tradition ? means to Texas A&M and as a result, the university was criticized for vigorously opposing use of the trademark by the Seahawks. As you know, the 12th Man is more than a trademark, greater than football and certainly more than changing the course of a football game. The 12th Man is a call to action for Aggies. It symbolizes loyalty and our unique Aggie Spirit. It creates friendships where none existed before, heals wounds that seemed to be beyond repair and creates a common language that Aggies speak all over the world.We had no choice but to challenge the Seattle Seahawks, just as we must protect and defend in every way possible all of our trademarks ? and none is more crucial than that of the 12th Man because of all it means to Aggies. We have not only protected the 12 Man trademark, but have strengthened it for the future to ensure that others cannot successfully challenge us. Now, we are in a position to license our trademark as a means of broadening our coverage and unquestioned ownership of the mark in both professional and collegiate sports. In the fall, you will see an unprecedented focus on our 12th Man trademark here at Texas A&M. Our goal is to maximize the recognition and connection to our school. Gig Em?Steven B. MooreChief Marketing Officer & Vice President for CommunicationsSo basically A&M retains the trademark, Seattle can use and market the term in the northwest while paying Texas A&M the rights to the term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wman Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Maybe if A&M focused more on football and less on branding their slogan they'd have a better team. Bring back the Whale! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cajunaggie08 Posted May 9, 2006 Author Share Posted May 9, 2006 We were just protecting what is ours. The team has gone through some rough times and I believe the worst of the worse is behind us. We will find out this season if Fran is the man to lead the Aggies or if we should move in a new direction. There was some unrest between the players that were Slocum's recruits and the ones that were Fran's recruits. All of Slocums kids have graduated now and these are all Frans players finally. Franchione will be coaching for his job this season It will be 8 wins or he will be fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedo Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 How far-reaching does this trademark go? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the Buffalo Bills have a refernce to "The 12th Man" (or something like that) on their Wall of Fame at RWS? "Old folks" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfpierce Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 We were just protecting what is ours. Good luck with that. Google 12th Man and A&M is just one of MANY results that show up. I guess their attorneys are going to have their hands full. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cajunaggie08 Posted May 9, 2006 Author Share Posted May 9, 2006 A&M has allready settled their case with the Seahawks, the courts seems to have recognized that the trademark does belong to A&M. It shouldnt be too hard to stop other teams from using the term widespread either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 A&M would have a point if they did this in the late 70s when the Hawks began promoting the term. The fact that they all of a sudden "realized" this in the week that the Hawks were headed to the Super Bowl (25 years later) says they're either idiots or ambulance chasers. Pretty shameful in my book. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Still, Seattle has used the term since before it was trademarked. They retired the 12th man jersey in 1984, six years before the university registered it as a trademark. If this is that important to the Texas A&M community, you'd think they would have trademarked it before 1990. I mean, it's been around since 1922. It sure as hell didn't take 68 years for it to catch on. And yes, the Bills still use the term. The Chicago Bears stopped using it at the request of the university.EDIT: Hawk said it well, and beat me to it. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfpierce Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 A&M has allready settled their case with the Seahawks, the courts seems to have recognized that the trademark does belong to A&M. It shouldnt be too hard to stop other teams from using the term widespread either. Agreed. But isn't A&M's history and tradition tainted a little when the use of the phrase isn't stopped? It's so important to them but they'll sell permission of it's use. If I were an Alum, I'd be pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 That's a great point as well, pierce. I just Googled "a&m 12th man trademark," and a letter from the same Steven B. Moore, written after the filing of the suit but before the settling of it today, came up as the first or second entry. This letter uses many of the same sentences as this new one, but one in particular caught my attention: We are not driven in this matter by concerns about any lost revenue in the licensing process; it is simply a matter of principle-ensuring that nothing infringes on the 12th Man concept and its Texas A&M uniqueness.See, I don't get why the university would then turn around and settle with the Seahawks for a licensing fee. That's what I call a direct contradiction, and I just lost a lot of respect for Texas A&M Univeristy, along with a lot of others, apparently. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 And once again I feel compelled to call both parties in the lawsuit silly and stupid. Seriously, what right does a fanbase have to declare itself so special that only they can declare themselves the 12th man? Does it mean that the fans of other teams can never be as dedicated to their own teams as Seattle's and A&M's? On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 What a joke Mets shoudl sue anyother teams that chant Lets GO fill in the blank, than. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebod39 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 The Bills don't use it as a marketing tool, so theres no infringing on anything. It's up on the Wall of Fame as a tribute to the fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBoyer Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 This e-mail sounds a lot like it was written by the leader of some cult, especially the following:It is hard for non-Aggies?and the media?to understand the depth of what the 12th Man reference and depiction?and the underlying tradition?means to Texas A&M and as a result, the university was criticized for vigorously opposing use of the trademark by the Seahawks. As you know, the 12th Man is more than a trademark, greater than football and certainly more than changing the course of a football game. The 12th Man is a call to action for Aggies. It symbolizes loyalty and our unique Aggie Spirit. It creates friendships where none existed before, heals wounds that seemed to be beyond repair and creates a common language that Aggies speak all over the world.Very solid points though, hawk and tempest. I agree wholeheartedly. I find it a glaring omission for the courts to NOT realize the date the flag was raised and the date the phrase was trademarked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfpierce Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Careful ZBoyer, your school could be next on A&M's hit list http://www.uconnhuskies.com/sports/MSoccer...006Kickoff.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cajunaggie08 Posted May 9, 2006 Author Share Posted May 9, 2006 I'm callin the lawyers right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 What the press release should have said:8 May 2006MEMORANDUMTo: Texas A&M Students, Faculty and StaffSubject: The Spirit of the 12th Man It is hard for non-Aggies?and the media?to understand the depth of what the 12th Man reference and depiction?and the underlying tradition ? means to Texas A&M. As you know, the 12th Man is more than a trademark, greater than football and certainly more than changing the course of a football game. The 12th Man is a call to action for Aggies. It symbolizes loyalty and our unique Aggie Spirit. It creates friendships where none existed before, heals wounds that seemed to be beyond repair and creates a common language that Aggies speak all over the world.Oh... and it generates cash flow for the school, so it's now available to anyone who meets our price. 'Cause tradition is great, but it's all about the Benjamins, baby.Charge Em?... I mean Gig 'Em.Steven B. MooreChief Marketing Officer & Vice President for Communication Ahhhhh... such a deeply meaningful tradition that the school didn't hesitate to whore it out for the almighty dollar. That's the old college spirit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmr Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 It is hard for non-Aggies?and the media?to understand the depth of what the 12th Man reference Awh, yes, the your not a part of if so you wont understand excuse. Wait, the more aptly titled "It is impossbile to understand from the outside, and impossible to explain from the inside" excuse. Man, I love a university that is willing to sell out it's most "sacred" tradition (I mean really, go with Silver Taps, or Muster as most important not 12th man, the man didnt even play!!) Stated earlier it wasnt for money, yet is willing to accept money, hmmm, myaybe they need mone for a new chem lab, since they have had two major explosions in the past 5yrs, or money for the other lawsuits that are still pending, or could it be to send every student a card on their 21st b-day reminding them not to drink to much, then telling the signs of alcohol posioning on the back of the card. Seriously can we get one, and I mean one TAMU related thread where, "cant understand unless you are one" excuse is not used. ~~dmr~~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColeJ Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 aggies suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 What a joke Mets shoudl sue anyother teams that chant Lets GO fill in the blank, than. that got me thinking, what would be equivalent in baseball. In the NL it would be the 10th man? and in the AL the 11th man?.... I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.