Epiphanic Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Showalter's plan lost me when he started with "contraction." "In the arena of logic, I fight unarmed."I tweet & tumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 I don't like Showalter's idea in general, but here's where it fails BADLY for me.He still rewards teams as "division winners", and yet, the divisions are meaningless other than that. If every team is going to play a completely balanced schedule against everyone else, then screw the divisions. Just put the top 4 or 6 or however many teams in each league in the playoffs. But, hell, his schedule is SO balanced, that the leagues are worthless, too. Just put the top 8 or 10 or 12 or whatever teams in one giant playoff pool. The bracket becomes one-sided.But that's a stupid, dry idea isn't it? We like groupings of teams. We like having the winners of said groupings play each other as representative of their respective grouping and seeing which one comes out on top.But the only way those groupings have any meaning is if you skew the schedule so that a winner of any particular grouping won that grouping in large part because they outplayed, head-to-head, the other members of their grouping.This is why I'm one of the few who opposes the schedule change the NHL underwent. I don't care about teams from the East. I don't care that much about teams from the Western Pacific or Western Northeast. I care about playing the teams in the Western Central, because those are the teams my Blues are fighting in order to grab a division championship.But in the NHL it can slide a little easier. I still don't like the idea of playing the East more, but in the NHL, teams are fighting for what are essentially 5 Wild Card spots. Division championships matter for the top seeds, but with the other spots being up to the whole conference, it makes sense to play other conference teams a bit as well.Under Showalter's plan, divisional or even league groupings have absolutely no factor in the schedule but do on the playoff seeding, and that's incredibly stupid. If Showwalter wants a system like this, he needs to scrap the ideas of groupings all together.But we know that won't fly, because it's simply not a system anybody would embrace. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epiphanic Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Save for soccer fans.I agree with you, STL. Having divisions really only means something if you have unbalanced schedules (balanced within each division, of course). "In the arena of logic, I fight unarmed."I tweet & tumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Heres the thing the Mets scouting and player development sytems are horrendous they dont turn out prospects out all, and when someone they call a five tool player comes up hes a big bust like Lanstings Miledge.Well there's two responses to that statement.One is that Mets fans need to focus their demand for change into that area of the ball club. It's an essential area for a Major League team to be good in if it is to succeed, and while it doesn't get the glitz and glamour of big money signings, it's equally as important. Demand the Mets make changes there.The second is that a successful farm system isn't always churning out superstars. I understand, Milledge was billed as a future superstar, so he's not the best example, but great farm systems produce quality MLB players in addition to a great player once every few years.Look around the league at the best teams. You'll no doubt see some star players that were signed with big money, and some that were acquired by using products of their farm system as trade chips. And some stars will be home-grown ones. But then look at the players that fill-in around the stars.Some of those guys will small signings and such, but probably somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3s of those remaining players are quality, legitimate MLB players produced by that clubs farm system. They receive little fanfare as they're coming up the ladder or even now as regulars or reserves, but they do their job, they do it well, and they're a key part of the winning clubs. And because they're home-grown, they're cheap, and they allow the club to spend that saved money on the stars that they do need.The process doesn't have to take that long, but it requires some patience. And if the Mets scouting system truly isn't up to par, that's where change needs to be focused as opposed to demanding the next shiny new free agent. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Save for soccer fans.Right.Fans, of course, need to be open to change, but sports would be very little without embracing the past. The culture of soccer allows for a division-less system. But the culture of more Americanized (for lack of a better term) sports practically REQUIRES divisional grouping. In those sports, I just can't see it being embraced. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 In an error filled game, Cliff Lee looks to be on pace for another Phillies "W". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Heres the thing the Mets scouting and player development sytems are horrendous they dont turn out prospects out all, and when someone they call a five tool player comes up hes a big bust like Lanstings Miledge.Well there's two responses to that statement.One is that Mets fans need to focus their demand for change into that area of the ball club. It's an essential area for a Major League team to be good in if it is to succeed, and while it doesn't get the glitz and glamour of big money signings, it's equally as important. Demand the Mets make changes there.The second is that a successful farm system isn't always churning out superstars. I understand, Milledge was billed as a future superstar, so he's not the best example, but great farm systems produce quality MLB players in addition to a great player once every few years.Look around the league at the best teams. You'll no doubt see some star players that were signed with big money, and some that were acquired by using products of their farm system as trade chips. And some stars will be home-grown ones. But then look at the players that fill-in around the stars.Some of those guys will small signings and such, but probably somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3s of those remaining players are quality, legitimate MLB players produced by that clubs farm system. They receive little fanfare as they're coming up the ladder or even now as regulars or reserves, but they do their job, they do it well, and they're a key part of the winning clubs. And because they're home-grown, they're cheap, and they allow the club to spend that saved money on the stars that they do need.The process doesn't have to take that long, but it requires some patience. And if the Mets scouting system truly isn't up to par, that's where change needs to be focused as opposed to demanding the next shiny new free agent.Look through out baseball, how many players that are key contributors have come from the Mets farm system?The Mets have two Wright and Reyes, but I mean through out all of baseball. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Just a glance at all 30 rosters here are the only key players currently who were developled and drafted by the MetsOrioles Melvin MoraTy WiggingtonMarlinsMatt LindstromRoyalsMike JacobsTwinsCarlos Gomez YankeesA.J. BurnettPiratesLastings MilledgePadresHeath Bell RaysScott Kazmir Blue JaysMarco Scutaro www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL_Ian Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 I feel like I just wasted my time reading that Showalter article. You just look at the Divisions the put together and can see flaws right away. Like why in the World would he claim the divisions are region based when the Pirates are in the same division with the Indians, Brewers and Twins and put the Rockies with the Braves, Tigers and Astros?Heh, what, you have a problem with a division comprised of teams from 3 different time zones? Also, what the hell is he talking about when he wrote, "No team travels any more or less than any other."? Is that even possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 The Buck Showalter Plan?It's another "Stop Reel A Line Mint" ideas, must be a slow day at ESPN. Cubs and Cardinals in SEPARATE divisions?!My head, it....it...arrgh./If I may make a suggestion, perhaps ESPN would be best served to not hype up each and every Yankees and Red Sox game in the manner they do if that is what Showalter objects to. On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Cliff Lee with Phillies:5 wins, 0 losses, 0.68 ERA. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJMorris3 Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Cliff Lee with Phillies:5 wins, 0 losses, 0.68 ERA.If you're trying to put him up for Cy Young, you're horribly mistaken. Sabathia was better last year and he didn't even get much of a sniff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Cliff Lee with Phillies:5 wins, 0 losses, 0.68 ERA.If you're trying to put him up for Cy Young, you're horribly mistaken. Sabathia was better last year and he didn't even get much of a sniff.Did the words "Cy" and / or "Young" appear anywhere in my post? "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Cliff Lee with Phillies:5 wins, 0 losses, 0.68 ERA.If you're trying to put him up for Cy Young, you're horribly mistaken. Sabathia was better last year and he didn't even get much of a sniff.Did the words "Cy" and / or "Young" appear anywhere in my post?Yes, it was all over that post! I believe it was somewhere lost in his microscopic ERA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltimoreFan Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 I agree with you, STL. Having divisions really only means something if you have unbalanced schedules (balanced within each division, of course).I agree, Showalter's plan was just way too radical. I think the simpliest idea would be to just move one NL team to the AL. The both league would have 15 teams, 5 teams per division. Just spread interleague play throughout the season. Neither expansion nor contraction seems plausible right now. So I would think this is the best plan to fix the mess they currently have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Sigh What did the Mets do to deserve this?NEW YORK -- Mets players said Monday they expect Johan Santana will require surgery on his left elbow to repair whatever malady has prompted the club to scratch the pitcher from his scheduled start against the Marlins in Miami on Tuesday. Instead of making his 26th start, Santana is to have his elbow examined by Mets medical director Dr. David Altchek. http://newyork.mets.mlb.com/news/article.j...sp&c_id=nymI revise my 2010 Mets prediction to 124 losses and the medical and training staff keep their jobs too. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Just a glance at all 30 rosters here are the only key players currently who were developled and drafted by the MetsOrioles Melvin MoraTy WiggingtonMarlinsMatt LindstromRoyalsMike JacobsTwinsCarlos Gomez YankeesA.J. BurnettPiratesLastings MilledgePadresHeath Bell RaysScott Kazmir Blue JaysMarco ScutaroUm, no he wasn't. He was developed in the minors with the Indians and Brewers. He spent some time with the Mets, but not much and that was at the major league level. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Oh my mistake thats one less, but you get my point that the Mets minor league/talent scouting and player development sucks and that is the main reason I want Omar fired, but Omar keeping his job means this won't change.Just a reminder Omar was also Expos GM and the Nats player development in his tenure there was just as bad. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still MIGHTY Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 SHUT THE UP!-----------Meanwhile, around the rest of the majorsBig, interesting, and possible playoff maych-up (if Texas wins the Wild Card) series starting in Anaheim tonight, AL West-leading Angels vs AL Central-leading Tigers. Weaver vs Verlander tonight.Lackey vs Washburn tomorrow.Saunders vs Jackson Wednesday.Should be a good one, and with Yankees vs Rangers starting tomorrow, The Halos could extend their division lead a little further or need to play well to keep it where it is at 5.5 games. The Tigers are also fighting to keep their division lead. Should be very entertaining | ANA | LAA | LAR | LAL | ASU | CSULB | USMNT | USWNT | LAFC | OCSC | MAN UTD | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Cliff Lee with Phillies:5 wins, 0 losses, 0.68 ERA.Another Millwood eh? All roads lead to Dollar General. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.