roxfan00 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Here is the logo for the 10th Anniversary of the Pepsi Center.and here's a version of the mountains in blue.Pepsi Center Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrad. Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 meh, seems like a cop-out for any denver-related place to just add some mtns. they should've worked a '10' in there somehow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBPerry Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 they still have the crush there even though the afl is no more...good grief Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickNickNick Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 meh, seems like a cop-out for any denver-related place to just add some mtns. they should've worked a '10' in there somehow...Looks to me like there is a 10 in there...isn't there? The Pepsi logo is a 0, the outline of the buildings or whatever beside it which is slightly darker is a 1.Not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamSoda Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Its not a 10th anniversary logo at all..Its just their new logo to match the new identity of Pepsi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrad. Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Its not a 10th anniversary logo at all..Its just their new logo to match the new identity of Pepsi.well that explains it. u were drawin for straws there Nick thanks for the clarification, CS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Instant fail just cause it uses the current pepsi smiling logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wasatch Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 As an arena logo, that?s actually not bad. I don?t see how they could have really made it any better without the Pepsi logo overshadowing everything else. The proportions seem to be decent and it doesn?t look too plain & simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamSoda Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 As an arena logo, that?s actually not bad. I don?t see how they could have really made it any better without the Pepsi logo overshadowing everything else. The proportions seem to be decent and it doesn?t look too plain & simple.The whole perspective is wrong though...If you looked at the Pepsi that way, you would see downtown, not the mountains... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enigma4289 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 As an arena logo, that?s actually not bad. I don?t see how they could have really made it any better without the Pepsi logo overshadowing everything else. The proportions seem to be decent and it doesn?t look too plain & simple.The whole perspective is wrong though...If you looked at the Pepsi that way, you would see downtown, not the mountains...No, the perspective is correct, it's looking at the south-east side of the building, not the south-west. Of course you wouldn't be able to see the mountains tower over the Pepsi center anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamSoda Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 As an arena logo, that?s actually not bad. I don?t see how they could have really made it any better without the Pepsi logo overshadowing everything else. The proportions seem to be decent and it doesn?t look too plain & simple.The whole perspective is wrong though...If you looked at the Pepsi that way, you would see downtown, not the mountains...No, the perspective is correct, it's looking at the south-east side of the building, not the south-west. Of course you wouldn't be able to see the mountains tower over the Pepsi center anyway.ahahah, no its not at all.When was the last time you were there?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DelayedPenalty Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 I'll give you an outsider's opinion when I'm there in October. Going to visit some friends who moved out there from Michigan, so it worked out well that it's Avs vs. Red Wings on October 24th! I will of course be cheering for the Avalanche! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oo_nrb Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 The perspective is kind of mostly correct. Here's a highly scientific drawing that shows where everything is: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wasatch Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Since when is the perspective portrayed in logos always 100% correct? It?s really not a big deal if it?s off a little bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamSoda Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Since when is the perspective portrayed in logos always 100% correct? It?s really not a big deal if it?s off a little bit.Its not off a little bit..its completely wrong and they just added the mountains to make it more Coloradoan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wasatch Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Since when is the perspective portrayed in logos always 100% correct? It?s really not a big deal if it?s off a little bit.Its not off a little bit..its completely wrong and they just added the mountains to make it more Coloradoan...You're right, the mountain tops in the logo look a lot more rugged then in reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamSoda Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Since when is the perspective portrayed in logos always 100% correct? It?s really not a big deal if it?s off a little bit.Its not off a little bit..its completely wrong and they just added the mountains to make it more Coloradoan...You're right, the mountain tops in the logo look a lot more rugged then in reality. good job, you figured out there are in fact Mtns. in Colo..Congrats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wasatch Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 good job, you figured out there are in fact Mtns. in Colo..Congrats.You just didn?t get it. I realize Colorado has mountains but the so-called ?mountains? next to Denver itself aren?t as rugged as portrayed in the logo. Thought I?d throw that in there since we?re after 100% perspective portrayal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamSoda Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 good job, you figured out there are in fact Mtns. in Colo..Congrats.You just didn?t get it. I realize Colorado has mountains but the so-called ?mountains? next to Denver itself aren?t as rugged as portrayed in the logo. Thought I?d throw that in there since we?re after 100% perspective portrayal! Do you even know what perspective means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-kj Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 Ahem.... if you two are done now, let's discuss the logo without the attitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.