1stDownCreative Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 hey lawyer people!!can a team be sued over the use of the same name/mascot?a semi-pro football team i played on named the ohio river bearcats received a cease and desist letter from the univ of cincy regarding the team NAME (bearcats).the problem is not in the logos, or wordmark, or colors....only in the NAME BEARCATS. as another university also uses the mascot name, it makes it seem even odder.its the a law or something that they can send make showing that cincy doesnt have exclusive use over the team name?thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stumpygremlin Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 That does seem a little odd. My concern would be how close you are to Cincinnati may have an impact over it. I don't know, though.At the very least they may be trying to invoke the idea that they are a much bigger institution than your semi-pro team and would be more willing to take it to court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makeroro Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 Mode redacted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gueman Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 Is there a bearcat in nature? Well according to Wiki it is another name for binturong. So I don't think they have much of a leg to stand on. Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. P. J. O'Rourke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElwoodCuse Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 they should change their name to the Catbears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 Actually, they likely have a strong case, as what's being violated is federal trademark law. The University of Cincinnati likely has a trademark for the term "Bearcats" which is applicable in the category of staging football exhibitions (or some such similar wording); in which case, you'd be prohibited from using it yourself without their expressed consent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffDawg Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 It was my understanding that a stand-alone nickname like "Bearcats" couldn't be copyrighted by itself without a unique combination to identify the institution that claims the copyright (a lot of big words, I know, but it basically means you can copyright "Cincinnati Bearcats" but not the name of the city or the nickname by itself).If nicknames could be copyrighted on their own, how quick do you think the NFL would be to snap up all their franchise nicknames and forbid any other sports team in the country from calling themselves the Bears, Eagles, Falcons, Lions, Giants, etc etc. There comes a point when you don't stand for the constant heartbreak anymore, and walk away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 1- Either your or a member of your team should consult a trademark attorney. "hey lawyer people!!", would not entice me to reply to any request. 2- Bearcats has the following list of trademarks. There is a youth football team which does have it active, so you could even be sued by them too.3-Legal advise on a sports-based message board is worth only as much as you paid for it. So see #1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Binghamton University in New York is also the Bearcats./just sayin Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordie_delini Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Kyler, one of my hockey teammates is a corporate lawyer who does quite a bit of work in copyright and trademark law. I'll ask him, see what he says and get back to you via PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mingjai Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Typed DrawingWord Mark BEARCATS Goods and Services IC 041. US 107. G & S: educational services; namely, providing courses of instruction, seminars, lectures, and conferences at the university undergraduate and graduate levels, and entertainment services; namely, arranging and conducting athletic competitions and musical concerts. FIRST USE: 19300000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19300000 Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING Serial Number 74115467 Filing Date November 15, 1990 Current Filing Basis 1A Original Filing Basis 1A Published for Opposition March 17, 1992 Registration Number 1692019 Registration Date June 9, 1992 Owner (REGISTRANT) University of Cincinnati, The EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OHIO Mail Location 623 Cincinnati OHIO 45221 Attorney of Record Lynda E. Roesch Prior Registrations 1505966;1521442 Type of Mark SERVICE MARK Register PRINCIPAL Affidavit Text SECT 15. SECT 8 (6-YR). SECTION 8(10-YR) 20020808. Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 20020808 Live/Dead Indicator LIVEIt appears that Cincinnati owns the typed wordmark "Bearcats" for use in arranging and conducting athletic competitions. They've been using the mark in commerce since 1930 and now have a Federal service mark. Good luck... Visit my store on REDBUBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordie_delini Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 They own the wordmark not necessarily the name Bearcats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 I don't want to get that involved, but since the Brooklyn Bearcats was approved, then I think that the semi-pro team may have a case. Then again, both they are the UC are in the state of Ohio. Like I said before, the legal advise you seek on a free, sports-based message board is worth only as much as you paid for it.Most of us are not attorneys. (Any of us who are probably would never claim they were as they would not want to be requested with basic traffic ticket threads every 96 hours.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddball Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 I'm going to take a stab at this and not being a lawyer, but understanding protecting of brands, that it is a violation of trademark and the University of Cincinnati's identity. Here's why as dfw pointed out, it's in the state of Ohio and it's the same sport, therefore to the average person who doesn't know sports could confuse the semi-pro team name and possible merchandise with the University of Cincinnati therefore diluting the university brand and causing the university to lose money. I also think that part of the issue is that it's a semi-pro team meaning the players get paid and that the university players are "amatuers" thus really confusing a person who doesn't know the difference and could lead to who knows what as far as gifts and payments to Cincinnati players. I'm just throwing it out there, but it sounds good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 It was my understanding that a stand-alone nickname like "Bearcats" couldn't be copyrighted by itself without a unique combination to identify the institution that claims the copyright (a lot of big words, I know, but it basically means you can copyright "Cincinnati Bearcats" but not the name of the city or the nickname by itself).If nicknames could be copyrighted on their own, how quick do you think the NFL would be to snap up all their franchise nicknames and forbid any other sports team in the country from calling themselves the Bears, Eagles, Falcons, Lions, Giants, etc etc.I like that you included this one in your theory considering the NY Giants is taken directly from the NY (now SF) Giants baseball team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.