Buster Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 i hate their current one. believe it or not, it actually turns me off the channel. this is arite i guess.Their programming turns me off.This logo...lazy and underwhelming. Might as well say it...horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fumbler Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Forward facing C surrounded by a backward facing C marvellous five minutes work thankyou 100,000 dollars thankyou. RICHMOND TIGERS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidson Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 you guys should watch the new branding reel i posted. this is a piece of channel branding, only a very small proportion of promo material is print based.there is a feck load of work that goes into something like this. i think its awesome. that aussie cc logo is horrific! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TenaciousG Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I like it.I don't get why everyone here hates on a simple, clean logo, then runs over to the uniform side and hates on Nike for too much unnecessary detail. My teamsNCAA: Washington StateMLB: Seattle MarinersNFL: Seattle SeahawksNBA: Portland TrailblazersEPL: Liverpool FCMLS: Seattle Sounders FCNHL: Pittsburgh Penguins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29texan Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I don't get it....I mean, is there even anything TOO get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I like it.I don't get why everyone here hates on a simple, clean logo, then runs over to the uniform side and hates on Nike for too much unnecessary detail.Horses for courses, my friend. Horses for courses. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.