Jump to content

NFL 2023 Changes


DCarp1231

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, BBTV said:

The Jets green jerseys are closer to what the Eagles wore in the '80s-'95 than the Eagles new throwbacks are.

 

Coulda just used that fabric and saved people lots of headaches.

 

I'm finally getting the jersey I ordered July 31st this week.

  • LOL 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lions are a number font, sleeve logo delete, and facemask color change away from having a really good uniform again.  

 

gtofflldz41y83dtlwtr.jpg

crcxh0tkqseds9qlfjt8.jpg

 

Looked great today in White over Grey.

 

Bucs looked awesome.  Not sure I'd feel the same if they wore these for 17 weeks every year, but great to see these back on the field finally.  

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, HOOVER said:

Bucs looked awesome.  Not sure I'd feel the same if they wore these for 17 weeks every year, but great to see these back on the field finally.  


Yes they did! But anyone clamoring for them to go back to these full time is nuts. They may look real cute now, but just try to imagine these on the back end of four consecutive ten loss seasons (something this franchise is very capable of at any point) where they wear nothing but the creamsicle throwbacks. It quickly goes from a fun little thing to a pirate with a dagger in its mouth winking at you in baby puke orange and a slightly darker shade of orange. For years. People really can’t quite grasp just how much that look was HATED by the time they changed it. Those old orange unis had such a putrid stench of failure caked into them by 1996. They had to go. 
 

These are fun strictly because they so rarely make an appearance. They’re a fun little treat on special occasions. Once a year is enough, and like I’ve said before, I’d like to see it even more infrequently than that, even. Once every five years, give or take, and only for really special occasions. 

  • Like 12
  • Dislike 3

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always been curious - why was it so hard to make royal blue helmets back then? As far as I can tell the first time someone wore them was the 2000 Giants. I'm sure it took as long as it did because of tradition and they probably could've been made earlier, but still. That's ridiculous that it took that long for a royal team to match their helmet to the rest of their uniform.

ExJworW.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, FiddySicks said:


Yes they did! But anyone clamoring for them to go back to these full time is nuts. They may look real cute now, but just try to imagine these on the back end of four consecutive ten loss seasons (something this franchise is very capable of at any point) where they wear nothing but the creamsicle throwbacks. It quickly goes from a fun little thing to a pirate with a dagger in its mouth winking at you in baby puke orange and a slightly darker shade of orange. For years. People really can’t quite grasp just how much that look was HATED by the time they changed it. Those old orange unis had such a putrid stench of failure caked into them by 1996. They had to go. 
 

These are fun strictly because they so rarely make an appearance. They’re a fun little treat on special occasions. Once a year is enough, and like I’ve said before, I’d like to see it even more infrequently than that, even. Once every five years, give or take, and only for really special occasions. 

 

As someone old enough to remember when they actually wore these full time, I can attest to this. Youths don't understand how much of a joke the Bucs were. The team was really bad, yes, but they were really bad while wearing the softest uniforms you could come up with. In the early 90's they felt like they existed specifically to wear goofy uniforms with a logo ripped from the cover of a trashy romance novel, and fill out easy wins on other teams' schedules. The rebrand saved the franchise. 

 

It's not a look that travels well and it's kind of wild that it made it until 1996. It was tough to make the colors work on sideline apparel or fan wear and everyone just looked kind of silly while wearing it. 

 

tony-dungy-buccaneers-head-coach-vaultjp

 

usatsi_13864004.jpg

 

 

At home with the orange jerseys and white pants wasn't so bad, but it looked especially goofy in the last few years when they insisted on wearing orange pants with orange socks to achieve one of the weirder colored leggings look of all time. 

 

9e7c9996-4974-4fd4-90bf-bd87843192d8_lg.FReFCWJXsAMbTIH?format=jpg&name=large

 

They're a fun curio in uniform history. It's hard to believe a pro sports team really chose to wear those colors for that long, but it's really for the best to keep it at a distance. I would hold it off for every five years whenever there's an anniversary. 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Applause 1
  • Dislike 1

PvO6ZWJ.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

d3fwitcelt79gx2zupdx.jpg

The Creamsicles are perfect in their current form, as a charming switch-up throwback look.

 

I also think that yesterday was the best that those uniforms have ever looked, the modern matte materials really enhance the colors and help them pop more than they ever have.

  • Like 17

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PrimalCookie said:

I've always been curious - why was it so hard to make royal blue helmets back then? As far as I can tell the first time someone wore them was the 2000 Giants. I'm sure it took as long as it did because of tradition and they probably could've been made earlier, but still. That's ridiculous that it took that long for a royal team to match their helmet to the rest of their uniform.


The explanation I’ve heard is at the time helmet manufacturers had a far more limited number of color options. The Giants and Rams had to choose between dark navy blue or bright Royal blue, which is what the Broncos opted for. My guess is they decided darker blue looked better with their royal blue jerseys than the brighter blue would have. When the Giants and Rams redesigned their uniforms in 2000 metallic flake paint was an option so both teams were able to more precisely match their jersey colors. 

  • Like 8

PvO6ZWJ.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, PrimalCookie said:

I've always been curious - why was it so hard to make royal blue helmets back then? As far as I can tell the first time someone wore them was the 2000 Giants. I'm sure it took as long as it did because of tradition and they probably could've been made earlier, but still. That's ridiculous that it took that long for a royal team to match their helmet to the rest of their uniform.

 

I've never bought the explanation that royal blue helmets were uniquely hard to make before the year 2000. Kentucky, BYU, Duke, Kansas, etc. had them at various times as far back as the '60s. When college football programs were able to do it in an era before bloated apparel deals from Adidas and Nike, there's no excuse for why NFL teams like the Giants and Rams couldn't do it besides laziness or just not caring about branding.

 

And then there's the biggest counterpoint of all: the Broncos, who had royal blue helmets for almost 30 years at the same time that they supposedly couldn't be done for other teams.

xLmjWVv.png

POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said:

I knew someone would post Tennessee.

 

The Volunteers lack red in their scheme and an orange facemask.
 

It’s close, but no cigar.

 

I know. Use your imagination. 

  • Like 6

PvO6ZWJ.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.