AAO Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgPacPBH Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 it's a solid concept, but i dont like the phasing out of the red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Very Nice. 2 very good ones to make up for 2 slightly bad ones.And I know your ignoring me! *makes faces* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 I would've liked to see the red implemented in some way in this concept. Otherwise, solid concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mings Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 i like the way you are taking some of the untouchable teams and making some concepts for them. the only thing i didnt like about the dbacks was the houston colors. the red sox one was a very nice update. the braves one was probably the weakest. the oriole was executed very well. on this one I would have kept the red in it, there isnt enough contrast between the two blues. i think if you spend time trying to make them as perfect as possible (in your eyes mainly, and in the eyes of perhaps some of the professional designers here, you would be able to maybe get some stuff sold perhaps. believe it or not the tpa logo I just did took about 2 weeks to go from first draft to final logo, and it was a pretty simplistic logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAO Posted January 9, 2005 Author Share Posted January 9, 2005 yea i ditched the red. The blues should contrast just fine, they do on my monitor at least. Very Nice. 2 very good ones to make up for 2 slightly bad ones.And I know your ignoring me! *makes faces* haha thanks im not ignoring you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilaLogos Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 what is the navy blue spot on his face? I suppose a shadow of sorts, but just looks awkward to me. Otherwise this is incredible!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgPacPBH Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 what is the navy blue spot on his face? I suppose a shadow of sorts, but just looks awkward to me. Otherwise this is incredible!! it is the snout part, with a space left for the light blue to poke through as the nose....at least thats how i see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 yea i ditched the red. The blues should contrast just fine, they do on my monitor at least. Very Nice. 2 very good ones to make up for 2 slightly bad ones.And I know your ignoring me! *makes faces* haha thanks im not ignoring you Oh..*shifty eyes* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 the red's awol, and i don't like the C. i do like the cub ball though. i guess i've had this coming to me for a while though, what with me messing with everybody else's teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Replace the bear with a bird and you've got yourself a terrific Blue Jays concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Replace the bear with a bird and you've got yourself a terrific Blue Jays concept. LOL, after looking at it closer than I did before, I thought the same thing. Replace "Cubs" with "Jays" and that's a kickazz Blue Jays concept Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgPacPBH Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Replace the bear with a bird and you've got yourself a terrific Blue Jays concept. this was my 1st thought after noticing no red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFan344 Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAO Posted January 9, 2005 Author Share Posted January 9, 2005 it is the snout part, with a space left for the light blue to poke through as the nose....at least thats how i see it. exactly. if you look at their current primary cub walking through the C now, its a big white spot. LOL, after looking at it closer than I did before, I thought the same thing. Replace "Cubs" with "Jays" and that's a kickazz Blue Jays concept i was thinking this the entire way through, from start to end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampman Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 I agree on the red comments--the Cubs look better with it--still a well done uni--just not right for the team... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAO Posted January 9, 2005 Author Share Posted January 9, 2005 thanks...guess i shouldve incorporated some red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilaLogos Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 what is the navy blue spot on his face? I suppose a shadow of sorts, but just looks awkward to me. Otherwise this is incredible!! it is the snout part, with a space left for the light blue to poke through as the nose....at least thats how i see it. i see it, but it still looks funny to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 ok i love the effort but one thing i see. toronto blue jays all over again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Replace the bear with a bird and you've got yourself a terrific Blue Jays concept. Is that because it looks like the bear has just been "hatched" out of that baseball-egg? (that's what I thought it looked like anyway). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.