KennyRock Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I could have posted this in Sports Logos, but I figured that this was the best place. IMO, the Texans, Colts and Bills helmets really worked well with the AFC uniform:While no one's helmet really look that great in the NFC - I didn't see all of them, so I could have missed one or two. The Falcons weren't too terrible...I will post the worst NFC combo here, which I think is awarded to the Eagles...or MAYBE the Vikings. New York Jets |3-3| First, AFC EastNew York Mets |74-88| Fourth, NL EastNew York Islanders|34-37-11| Fifth, Atlantic DivisionNew Orleans Hornets |21-45| Third, Southwest Division Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrivnak Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I just thought it was nice seeing Vick with real receivers to throw to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I did not like the Giants sleeve patch. It should have just been a blue "NY" Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I did not like the Giants sleeve patch. It should have just been a blue "NY" what was the logo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrivnak Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 It was a white NY on a blue square background. It did look odd. I liked how the unis also had the team wordmark as a patch on the right shoulder. I actually liked these unis, a lot better than some of their recent efforts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I see these uniforms as the answer to the question: "What else can we add to these uniforms? They're not cluttered enough!" Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 i know one thing: i like the logo under the number, and also the subtle NFL shields on the uniform-reminded me of the stars on the Magic's old unis, you could only see em close up. A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I just thought it was nice seeing Vick with real receivers to throw to. Amen to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebod39 Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 ugly and cluttered. There is just no reason to put the PB logo on their twice, much lessunder the back numbers. And from what I've read about the Giants sleeve logosand other wordmarks, it sounds like someone is asleep at the switcn over at Reebok.When a bunch of guys on a message board know more and care moreabout the look and correctness of the uni's then something is wrong with their company.these uni's just plain suck, sorry my 2¢. I just wish they go back to basicsor of you're going to do a "trendy" jersey, then at least do it well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 ebod39 is right, they should go back to the basics. One of the worst things was how the patches with the scripts on the top left looked. I didnt like the italicized #s either. It looked like Reebok threw these suckers together in 10 minutes tops. The only thing i did like was the design of the piping around the stars on the sides. The pats logo looked nice too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFan344 Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I just thought it was nice seeing Vick with real receivers to throw to. I was suprised he was actually throwing to them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swisherHOU Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockchalk Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 What purpose does the logo just above the butt have? You would only see it if you were watching someone run away from you I've decided to give up hope for all sports teams I follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I'd say the Chiefs also looked good with the AFC uni.I also think the Rams looked okay with the NFC, and though I don't remember seeing any, I assume the Giants probably looked pretty good. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I just thought it was nice seeing Vick with real receivers to throw to. I was suprised he was actually throwing to them O gawd, why do you think Vick runs all the time? We basically have NO receivers besides Crumpler.Now for my opinion on the Pro Bowl unis. They looked shabbily done, when it comes to patches and all that. I remember Tiki Barber's "NY" patch had a blue block with the "NY" inside of it. It looked extremely tacky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCScout76 Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 The NFC pants are horrible - why not navy blue? What's up with those pants Kansas City Scouts (CHL) Orr Cup Champions 2010, 2019, 2021 St. Joseph Pony Express (ULL) 2023 Champions Kansas City Cattle (CL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac6674 Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 That stupid looking Giants logo was the first thing I noticed; it really stuck out. Also, whatever happened to the veteran player getting to keep his actual # and the younger guy having to change? Now they'll throw out 3 linebackers all wearing #51; it's just stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleFan344 Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 That stupid looking Giants logo was the first thing I noticed; it really stuck out. Also, whatever happened to the veteran player getting to keep his actual # and the younger guy having to change? Now they'll throw out 3 linebackers all wearing #51; it's just stupid. I like when the players wear their own numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac6674 Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 I always thought it was a cool show of respect to the veteran guys; the NHL does (sorry, did) the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 That stupid looking Giants logo was the first thing I noticed; it really stuck out. Also, whatever happened to the veteran player getting to keep his actual # and the younger guy having to change? Now they'll throw out 3 linebackers all wearing #51; it's just stupid. I like when the players wear their own numbers. Except that the announcers botched nearly half of the play calls. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.