CC97 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Here's the wordmark that Tazz013 posted yesterday, but took down:I've color-corrected this to more accurately reflect what the graphic would look like when printed. I still say the Greens are too close together as far as the shade of Green goes.Here's a color-corrected version of the secondary logo: http://www.sportslogos.net/team.php?t=225 --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Felder Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Thanks, PANTONE and STL!Any word on the jerseys? If green is not the main color, I may have to go chain myself to the doors of the Bradley Center in protest.I never minded the logo...I just was never a fan of the purple. So I'm pleased with the "new" logo. I just hope they are smart with the jerseys. You can make green and red look good...but it's a lot easier to make green and red look stupid. Hopefully, the Bucks know what they're doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powersurge Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Veeeeeery nice! I like it!Its nice to see a new NBA style WITHOUT Navy, or light blue or any variation of bothI think it'll make them distinctive and original Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 http://www.sportslogos.net/team.php?t=225 I don't get it.What the? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 No purple = definite upgrade 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 http://www.sportslogos.net/team.php?t=225 FYI - Your alternate logo claims to be on a red triangle, but there's no red triangle present in the graphic. It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 http://www.sportslogos.net/team.php?t=225 I don't get it.What the? Not really much to get... I was just pointing out that the site already had the logos you posted up on the site.You know... just playin' 'round, having fun, jumping, running, spinning, dancing... --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 http://www.sportslogos.net/team.php?t=225 FYI - Your alternate logo claims to be on a red triangle, but there's no red triangle present in the graphic. That's what I get for assuming. --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 http://www.sportslogos.net/team.php?t=225 FYI - Your alternate logo claims to be on a red triangle, but there's no red triangle present in the graphic. That's what I get for assuming. I mean that you say the alternate is on a red triangle, but the alternate that you present ISN'T on a red triangle.I have no knowledge of what's right or wrong, but your description doesn't match your graphic.Just trying to help.EDIT - You got it now It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 http://www.sportslogos.net/team.php?t=225 FYI - Your alternate logo claims to be on a red triangle, but there's no red triangle present in the graphic. That's what I get for assuming. I mean that you say the alternate is on a red triangle, but the alternate that you present ISN'T on a red triangle.I have no knowledge of what's right or wrong, but your description doesn't match your graphic.Just trying to help.EDIT - You got it now Yeah I assumed the alt graphic had the red triangle on it as well, so that's why i said it... all fixed up! --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 It looks good, but would it kill the NBA to design a logo from scratch? ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJD802 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Let me get this straight, after all the hub bub about new uniforms/logo all they're going to do is recolor the boring logo they used to have?? That sucks. I like the fact they're switching colors but whats the point if they're not going to update the logo (not counting the new style lettering). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazz013 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 But the buck head isn't the secondary logo, it's a partial logo. The antlers and ball on the red triangle is the secondary logo. Save the slugalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 It could use some more bevels. Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamcz Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 Let me get this straight, after all the hub bub about new uniforms/logo all they're going to do is recolor the boring logo they used to have?? That sucks. I like the fact they're switching colors but whats the point if they're not going to update the logo (not counting the new style lettering). There will be new uniforms as well. Wait until you see them to complain about the lack of change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 But the buck head isn't the secondary logo, it's a partial logo. The antlers and ball on the red triangle is the secondary logo. Seconday, partial... same thing. --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 This discussion seems kind of anal...you know, even for this board... 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sterling84 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 I really enjoy that the new lighting effects on the antlers clearly show the two "lead" tines coming forward and not behind the rest of the spikes. EDIT** In terms of the alt.I get anal about that stuff...animal accuracy, anatomy etc.It's one of the elements I tried to convey in my concept...but took to a complicated level.However, that is in stark contrast to how the antlers are handled on the primary....which is very inconsistent.Slapshot RE: More bevels. HA! I don't want to come down TOO hard on this because it is.......better.But getting punched in the face twice is better than getting punched in the face three times. So better is relative. The Official Cheese-Filled Snack of NASCAR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 I agree that this is all getting anal, but yeah - secondary logos and partial logos are NOT the same thing.Anyway, here are the new Bucks colors as well:...and, a color-corrected version of the primary logo:Note that the Red is actually a dark, almost Brick-like shade. Actually, it's identical to Miami Heat Red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sterling84 Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 OH. And RE: the wordmark.I see Pantone's concerns and raise him some more.This color scheme (at least as far as we've been privvy to) has the exact same problems the purple primary one did.The dk green, middle green and red do not suffice as a dark, middle and light color scheme to establish contrast.From any further away it will all be mud. Just like the Rockies nameplates.How do they NOT see that in two years of beta testing? The Official Cheese-Filled Snack of NASCAR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.