patsox Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger77 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Its a good start but too close to the Pittsburgh alt turned road from the late '90s.-Dan PotD May 11th, 2011looooooogodud: June 7th 2010 - July 5th 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILADELPHIAFLYERS Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 oh man. just scratch it and start over. No offense, its creative but ugly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 I too was reminded of the old Penguins alts. Not really you're fault, but still something worth noting.Also, I'm curious what happens to the striping...how does it end? JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColeJ Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 I too was reminded of the old Penguins alts. Not really you're fault, but still something worth noting.Also, I'm curious what happens to the striping...how does it end?that was my biggest question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayJaxon Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Maybe if you have the stripes come full circle and meet with the front of the logo, that might work. I don't know anything about hockey, but this concept is interesting and I think it would work if you brought it all the way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB61 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 1. You left the trademark on the logo.2. Even if it did circle around to the back, I can't see that gracefully ending and the number blending in nicely like the Pens did.3. The striping on the bottom is sloppy and uneven. Not only that, it looks like it's just hanging out there.4. Arial Black for the font? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capn89 Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 It's very poor all around. I see what you were going for and it just isn't something worth going for. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bohob Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Good idea, very poorly executed. Creative is fine, but back it up with execution. See "The Barrish" for further comments. NHL 2016 by Bowen Hobbs * BOHOB's MLB Redesign Project * MiLB Re-Brands * NCAA Football Concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliott Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 The outline on the logo looks pretty sloppy. So do the white lines inside the logo, it doesn't just go down diagonally in a straight line like it should. For some reason the widths of the stripes on the arms don't match the logo widths, and they don't match the color order of the striping formed by the logo. Furthermore the two outermost stripes on the arm striping are not the same width. The bottom stripe is just a mess, it's choppy and the widths don't even come close to emulating any other stripes throughout the jersey, creating even more inconsistency. The shoulders look really empty with out any patch logos or striping. Finally the lack of a back view or arm numbers makes it really hard to envision what it would actually look like. I'd like to see a perfect concept. If you are attempting to make anything but a perfect concept, then you are in fact being lazy IMO....your words not mine. I would have liked to seen a lot more effort here. Dribbble ... Behance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baronvg Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 My first impression is: It's not too bad. Not bad at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korbyn Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Without seeing the back this is a incomplete concept.I will leave my feedback until I see the back ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHcreative Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Without seeing the back this is a incomplete concept.I will leave my feedback until I see the back ...I agree, you can't really call this a complete concept without the back of the jersey. Skipping out on the pants and socks is fine for just a jersey idea, but you need to show us all aspects of the jersey itself before you ask for comments and criticism. For what's been shown so far, it's a good idea but is poorly executed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linus Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Nevermind. beLEAF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zmspartans Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 No offense, but this is terrible. Having the logo go around to the back looks realy bad. And it is all really sloppy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raysox Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 ahhhhh, no.I agree, that it should go around. It would look somewhat like my concept from back in the day.http://boards.sportslogos.net/index.php?s=...t&p=1079941but it's plain, and doesn't look well thought out. @MichaelDanger19 | Dribbble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korbyn Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 ahhhhh, no.I agree, that it should go around. It would look somewhat like my concept from back in the day.http://boards.sportslogos.net/index.php?s=...t&p=1079941but it's plain, and doesn't look well thought out.I knew I had seen something similar to this before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsfan1 Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 Keep the Flyers current font and design the back of this jersey. It's nice though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfan98 Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 a little plain, and the number font is too generic Don't you want the JOJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.