Bleujayone Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 As posted on CBS Sports.comI'll let everyone here decide if this is real or bunk....http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/15811074"I hate rumor-mongering and I hate the argument over steroids, but this is too ?juicy? to pass up.rotoinfo.com has posted the list of 103 names on the mythical 2003 steroid list.I don't believe this to be true at all. Simply take a look at the names and feel free to discuss it in the comments. If you take it any further, please excuse yourself from the Internet.This could all be a crock of nothing, and that?s the way I?m leaning right now."1.Nomar Garciaparra2.Manny Ramirez3.Johnny Damon4.Trot Nixon5.David Ortiz6.Shea Hillenbrand7.Derek Lowe8.Pedro Martinez9.Brian Roberts10.Jay Gibbons11.Melvin Mora12.Jerry Hairston13.Jason Giambi14.Alfonso Soriano15.Raul Mondesi16. Aaron Boone17.Andy Pettitte18.Jose Contreras19.Roger Clemens20.Carlos Delgado21.Vernon Wells22.Frank Catalanotto23.Kenny Rogers24.Magglio Ordonez25.Sandy Alomar26.Bartolo Colon27.Brent Abernathy28.Jose Lima29.Milton Bradley30.Casey Blake31.Danys Baez32.Craig Monroe33.Dmitri Young34.Alex Sanchez35.Eric Chavez36.Miguel Tejada37.Eric Byrnes38.Jose Guillen39.Keith Foulke40.Ricardo Rincon41.Bret Boone42.Mike Cameron43.Randy Winn44.Ryan Franklin45.Freddy Garcia46.Rafael Soriano47.Scott Spiezio48.Troy Glaus49.Francisco Rodriguez50.Ben Weber51.Alex Rodriguez52.Juan Gonzalez53.Rafael Palmeiro54.Carl Everett55.Javy Lopez56.Gary Sheffield57.Mike Hampton58.Ivan Rodriguez59.Derrek Lee60.Bobby Abreu61.Terry Adams62.Fernando Tatis63.Livan Hernandez64.Hector Almonte65.Tony Armas66.Dan Smith67.Roberto Alomar68.Cliff Floyd69.Roger Cedeno70.Jeromy Burnitz71.Moises Alou72.Sammy Sosa73.Corey Patterson74.Carlos Zambrano75.Mark Prior76.Kerry Wood77.Matt Clement78.Antonio Alfonseca79.Juan Cruz80.Aramis Ramirez81.Craig Wilson82.Kris Benson83.Richie Sexson84.Geoff Jenkins85.Valerio de los Santos86.Benito Santiago87.Rich Aurilia88.Barry Bonds89.Andres Galarraga90.Jason Schmidt91.Felix Rodriguez92.Jason Christiansen93.Matt Herges94.Paul Lo Duca95.Shawn Green96.Oliver Perez97.Adrian Beltre98.Eric Gagne99.Guillermo Mota100.Luis Gonzalez101.Todd Helton102.Ryan Klesko103.Gary Matthews We all have our little faults. Mine's in California. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 If ESPN gets wind of this (with or without figuring out if this is true or not) all hell's about to break loose in the baseball world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cappital92 Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 It looks like a fair amount of guys that are on the Mitchell Report are on here. Then again, the list would have no credibility whatsoever if someone on the Mitchell Report wasn't on the list, so take that with a grain of salt. http://www.wizardsxtra.com Is it the shoes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerbreadmann Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 You guys didn't see this earlier? It's been out for 4 or 5 days now. I'm almost positive that it's bull , given the lack of fringe-type players, the large number of seemingly handpicked big names, and the fact that when this list was first released on Rotoinfo (which I've never heard of and gave no sources whatsoever), Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshhockey Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Thank god Ken Griffey Jr. has not been on any of these lists. If it ever comes out that he took steroids, I'm going to quit baseball and stop watching forever. I will completely disassociate myself with the game of baseball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 This could be the list and if it is the biggest shock I will say is Pedro Martinez, this guy weighs 150lbs. I would never though he was a juicer. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 You guys didn't see this earlier? It's been out for 4 or 5 days now. I'm almost positive that it's bull , given the lack of fringe-type players, the large number of seemingly handpicked big names, and the fact that when this list was first released on Rotoinfo (which I've never heard of and gave no sources whatsoever), Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96.You are correct as this was on Deadspin earlier this week then was taken down. Jason Grimsley admitted he failed a test in 2003, but is not listed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 It looks like they just compiled a list of all the players who were caught or admitted to it and added in a bunch of players who have started to struggle in the past couple of seasons. --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayJaxon Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 This list is probably BS. If it was legit, ESPN would have had a field day with it already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleujayone Posted July 4, 2009 Author Share Posted July 4, 2009 Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96.Not on this list. #96 is listed as Oliver Perez.Maybe you're right and the list is nonsense. I would say again that MLB should just bite the bullet, release the damn list and get it over with. It'll either confirm the above list or prove it to be otherwise. In any event, it would bring this whole affair into the light. Then and only then would the sport have any real possibility of being able to deal with the issue and move on. Otherwise, it will always be the festering pile of dog crap in the middle of the room that no one wants to address. Eventually somebody has got to pick up this mess. We all have our little faults. Mine's in California. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
floydnimrod Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Thank god Ken Griffey Jr. has not been on any of these lists. If it ever comes out that he took steroids, I'm going to quit baseball and stop watching forever. I will completely disassociate myself with the game of baseball.Seconded. When Junior was still here in Cincinnati, everytime something about steroids came out, the Cincinnati Enquirer would have an article about how Griffey was never mentioned in any of it.Also, I would hate it if Jerry Hairston really took steroids. Mancakes: The Bandhttps://twitter.com/FloydNimrod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96.Not on this list. #96 is listed as Oliver Perez.Maybe you're right and the list is nonsense. I would say again that MLB should just bite the bullet, release the damn list and get it over with. It'll either confirm the above list or prove it to be otherwise. In any event, it would bring this whole affair into the light. Then and only then would the sport have any real possibility of being able to deal with the issue and move on. Otherwise, it will always be the festering pile of dog crap in the middle of the room that no one wants to address. Eventually somebody has got to pick up this mess.Heres how you clean it upMLB announces that the HOF should not account for steroids, and that anyone who used steroids before 2005, when they began suspending players should be granted amnesty, and thus the matter is close. MLB should make at the same time one cleansing statement admitting that as a league, it looked the other way, and did not take the issue seriously, and acknowledge allot of players took steroids, and the fact the league did not take the issue seriously probably caused this. Also mention there were several players who were in it just to cheat the system, but with so many players using steroids it would be unfair to determine who those players were, as opposed to the players who ended up using steroids to keep up with other abusers. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thad Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 None of those names seriously shock me, but if Andres Galarraga was a steroid user I'll be greatly disappointed. I'll say this is fake, ESPN would be all over this if it were true. Life is 10% what happens to you and 90% about how you react to it.App State Mountaineers / Alabama Crimson Tide / Atlanta Braves / New York Jets / Atlanta Hawks "If you believe in yourself and have dedication and pride - and never quit, you'll be a winner. The price of victory is high but so are the rewards." [Bear Bryant]Redmond Rampage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96.Not on this list. #96 is listed as Oliver Perez.Maybe you're right and the list is nonsense. I would say again that MLB should just bite the bullet, release the damn list and get it over with. It'll either confirm the above list or prove it to be otherwise. In any event, it would bring this whole affair into the light. Then and only then would the sport have any real possibility of being able to deal with the issue and move on. Otherwise, it will always be the festering pile of dog crap in the middle of the room that no one wants to address. Eventually somebody has got to pick up this mess.MLB won't release that list unless they really, really want to piss off the Players' Union. The only reason the union allowed this drug testing was that MLB promised confidentiality with the results. The legal issues that could come from this would be astounding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerbreadmann Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96.Not on this list. #96 is listed as Oliver Perez.Maybe you're right and the list is nonsense. I would say again that MLB should just bite the bullet, release the damn list and get it over with. It'll either confirm the above list or prove it to be otherwise. In any event, it would bring this whole affair into the light. Then and only then would the sport have any real possibility of being able to deal with the issue and move on. Otherwise, it will always be the festering pile of dog crap in the middle of the room that no one wants to address. Eventually somebody has got to pick up this mess.WasWhen it was first released, there were 104 names and two of them were Jeromy Burnitz. It was soon edited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96.Not on this list. #96 is listed as Oliver Perez.Maybe you're right and the list is nonsense. I would say again that MLB should just bite the bullet, release the damn list and get it over with. It'll either confirm the above list or prove it to be otherwise. In any event, it would bring this whole affair into the light. Then and only then would the sport have any real possibility of being able to deal with the issue and move on. Otherwise, it will always be the festering pile of dog crap in the middle of the room that no one wants to address. Eventually somebody has got to pick up this mess.Heres how you clean it upMLB announces that the HOF should not account for steroids, and that anyone who used steroids before 2005, when they began suspending players should be granted amnesty, and thus the matter is close. MLB should make at the same time one cleansing statement admitting that as a league, it looked the other way, and did not take the issue seriously, and acknowledge allot of players took steroids, and the fact the league did not take the issue seriously probably caused this. Also mention there were several players who were in it just to cheat the system, but with so many players using steroids it would be unfair to determine who those players were, as opposed to the players who ended up using steroids to keep up with other abusers.You cannot release names, period. The document was sealed, however there have been people who apparently want to "snitch". I would think that someone like you Tank would appreciate the justice system and the sealing of documents because of your career and political leanings. If both parties agree to sealed documents, then so be it. Congress could take away the anti-trust agreement not, but cannot enforce it retroactively for names of failed tests. Heck, many of us here hate our employers, government interference in out lives (like asking for ID in airports), or other information gathering, yet, some want a sealed court document be released by "the employer". Any court should find MLB guilty of a workplace violation. How you anyone who would like MLB to release name think about if their employer, regardless of nation, publicly sent out a memo that you failed a drug test and named the substance(s)? This is unlike an arrest therefore public record. Deadspin From Tuesday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleujayone Posted July 4, 2009 Author Share Posted July 4, 2009 The records should never have been sealed to begin with. There are no minors involved, there is no threat to national security and if the information in it is true then it's hardly defamation of character. This move was simply to avoid embarrassment and potential fan backlash. That the public knows the existence of said document is damaging already. Sweeping previous mentioned dog crap under the rug does not make it go away. I would argue it makes it worse. The players union should hardly be in a position to negotiate this particular document to be sealed. They, like the players themselves and MLB looked the other way knowing full well steroids were running rampant. One of the responsibilities of any union is to look out for the safety and best interests of its members. Allowing them to participate in a physically unsafe (however voluntary) and illegal activity (regardless that MLB lacked outright rules & testing against it), is completely contradictory of its very existence. Seriously, can you imagine a union in any other industry getting away with allowing their members to partake in a dangerous and life threatening activity- especially in co-operation with the industry itself? Yes, a union is suppose to work an industry to be sure the workers are being treated proper, but they also have responsibility to be sure the workers also maintain standards. The fact that the players' union has also hindered the proper testing and investigation of steroids, shows that it is also very much part of the problem. In fact, I would go further to say that they are in some ways more guilty for allowing this to continue. The union already has many black marks against it. It is far too powerful for its own good, it has taken many pointless positions against MLB and even against the players it professes to defend. Many steps MLB could take to potentially improve the game have been met with a reflexive stonewall tactic by the union. This is not to say that MLB's lack of progress can be blamed solely on the union, but it can be said they are indeed a big part of the problems. We all have our little faults. Mine's in California. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Jeromy Burnitz was on the list twice, #70 and #96.Not on this list. #96 is listed as Oliver Perez.Maybe you're right and the list is nonsense. I would say again that MLB should just bite the bullet, release the damn list and get it over with. It'll either confirm the above list or prove it to be otherwise. In any event, it would bring this whole affair into the light. Then and only then would the sport have any real possibility of being able to deal with the issue and move on. Otherwise, it will always be the festering pile of dog crap in the middle of the room that no one wants to address. Eventually somebody has got to pick up this mess.Where have you been the last decade? It's already been in the light. The only people who need to come to grips with the issue of this being another "era" in baseball are those holier-than-thou media types in their ivory towers filled with nostalgia.As for the list in particular....Names are getting slowly released because of subpoenas in court procedings over the BALCO case since the Federal Government seized the list. MLB guaranteed anonymity to the union for the tests, and it would have existed to this day had the Players Association actually had the sense to destroy the records like they should have. On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayJaxon Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 The records should never have been sealed to begin with. There are no minors involved, there is no threat to national security and if the information in it is true then it's hardly defamation of character. This move was simply to avoid embarrassment and potential fan backlash. That the public knows the existence of said document is damaging already. Sweeping previous mentioned dog crap under the rug does not make it go away. I would argue it makes it worse. The players union should hardly be in a position to negotiate this particular document to be sealed. They, like the players themselves and MLB looked the other way knowing full well steroids were running rampant. One of the responsibilities of any union is to look out for the safety and best interests of its members. Allowing them to participate in a physically unsafe (however voluntary) and illegal activity (regardless that MLB lacked outright rules & testing against it), is completely contradictory of its very existence. Seriously, can you imagine a union in any other industry getting away with allowing their members to partake in a dangerous and life threatening activity- especially in co-operation with the industry itself? Yes, a union is suppose to work an industry to be sure the workers are being treated proper, but they also have responsibility to be sure the workers also maintain standards. The fact that the players' union has also hindered the proper testing and investigation of steroids, shows that it is also very much part of the problem. In fact, I would go further to say that they are in some ways more guilty for allowing this to continue. The union already has many black marks against it. It is far too powerful for its own good, it has taken many pointless positions against MLB and even against the players it professes to defend. Many steps MLB could take to potentially improve the game have been met with a reflexive stonewall tactic by the union. This is not to say that MLB's lack of progress can be blamed solely on the union, but it can be said they are indeed a big part of the problems.I couldn't agree with you more. I'm not a big fan of this Union either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewPF Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Trot Nixon! hahaha riiiiiight.Nomar wouldn't surprise me though... in' Nomar. http://i.imgur.com/4ahMZxD.png koizim said: And...and ya know what we gotta do? We gotta go kick him in da penis. He'll be injured. Injured bad. COYS and Go Sox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.