Kevin W. Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 http://www.pac-10.org/logocontest.aspxPersonally, I'm torn between 2 and 4.EDIT: Apparently some people are having trouble seeing all of the logos, so here they are: Mighty Ducks of Anaheim (CHL - 2018 Orr Cup Champions) Chicago Rivermen (UBA/WBL - 2014, 2015, 2017 Intercontinental Cup Champions) King's Own Hexham FC (BIP - 2022 Saint's Cup Champions) Portland Explorers (EFL - Elite Bowl XIX Champions) Real San Diego (UPL) Red Bull Seattle (ULL - 2018, 2019, 2020 Gait Cup Champions) Vancouver Huskies (CL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I like #1 best, but could live with #2. Of course this is with the key part left off: The sponsor logo has to be worked in. Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJM Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I wanna like #4, but something about it is off...I went with #1. (MLF) Chicago Cannons, (IHA) Phoenix Firebirds - 2021 Xtreme Cup Champions (WAFL) Phoenix Federals - WAFL World Bowl XII Champions (Defunct) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJack Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I went 4, and wasn't surprised that it was the least voted for. They are all good, and none of them are great. I just liked the heavy amount of white in #4. #1 was way too dark. #2 had some goofy fonts for "2011" and "Football", and way too much blank blue gradient space. And #3 looked like something I coulda done. Too amateur. My vote would be to use #4 and replace the ugly roman numerals with a simple 2011 or something.Either way, my biggest concern was how the patch would work with Oregon's winged jerseys. And assuming we'll have the best record and be the home team, I wanted a lot of white to contrast the green or black so it stands out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thespleenenator Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 #3 is probably the best. It's just more "Pac-12" if that makes any sense. Why you make fun of me? I make concept for Auburn champions and you make fun of me. I cry tears.Chopping off the dicks of Filipino boys and embracing causes that promote bigotry =/= strong moral character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BupsJones Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 #2 makes for the best jersey patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tj4eck Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 4 wasn't showing up on my computer...maybe its doing the same on some other computers thats why its not getting votesi went with 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin W. Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 I added all four of the logos to the OP. Mighty Ducks of Anaheim (CHL - 2018 Orr Cup Champions) Chicago Rivermen (UBA/WBL - 2014, 2015, 2017 Intercontinental Cup Champions) King's Own Hexham FC (BIP - 2022 Saint's Cup Champions) Portland Explorers (EFL - Elite Bowl XIX Champions) Real San Diego (UPL) Red Bull Seattle (ULL - 2018, 2019, 2020 Gait Cup Champions) Vancouver Huskies (CL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxColonels Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 I went with 3 as well. It was almost #2 but I don't care for the font used for "2011". I like #1 but hate the banner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikmurphy Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 three by far is the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueYankee26 Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 3 is best cause it pops because of the sun rays.. trueyankee26.wordpress.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 I'd like 4 much more if they dropped the year at the bottom.But definitely 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 #1 looks like something they might use on the ESPN Broadcast graphic to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slammersman Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 Well # 3 is leading when I voted for # 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanB06 Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 #3 is probably the best. It's just more "Pac-12" if that makes any sense.Plus, count the number of rays on #3. It's little things like that that set a logo apart. Sodboy13 said: As you watch more basketball, you will learn to appreciate the difference between "defense" and "couldn't find the rim with a pair of bloodhounds and a Garmin." meet the new page, not the same as the old page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 Voted for 3 which currently leads with 33.33% of the vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funky Bunky Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 None of them are bad, but I prefer #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetsGoOakland9 Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 None of them are good, but I prefer #1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 #2 looks the cleanest.#3 looks like they're trying to include their old conference logo..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primal Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 I love the logo+football of #4 but the mismatching fonts and the stylised roman numerals suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.