Brass Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 You know, I've never been a huge "CROSBY IS A BITCH" fellow, but what he did to Rask, that was a bitch move. On 4/10/2017 at 3:05 PM, Rollins Man said: what the hell is ccslc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Sidney don't start what you can't finish. Just stick to scoring goals, don't be a quasi tough guy. On the other hand, Malkin just KO's Bergeron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Wow, Bergeron got his ass beat. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fouhy12 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 In what universe is Cooke's hit a five and a game, but Marchand's isn't?Boston seems content to goon it up this series.The Cooke hit was at full speed and with the body, Marchand's was just a shove. And Cooke has a really bad history.That last scrum was instigated by Iginla. This should be an interesting third period. fouhy12's NFL Concepts 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 In what universe is Cooke's hit a five and a game, but Marchand's isn't?Boston seems content to goon it up this series.The Cooke hit was at full speed and with the body, Marchand's was just a shove. And Cooke has a really bad history.Maz, c'mon man. They were both 2-5-10. Didn't get called that way. Clearly you took a bathroom break at the buzzer or you're still utterly homeristic (is that a word?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maz Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Cooke was going with the two Boston players into the boards. His momentum carried him. It was a board and a half, yes, and fine give him five because he is Cooke. But it is a routine boarding going with the flow of the play and at that point you set a precedent. Marchand went out of his way to cross check a stationary Neal face first into the boards with obvious malicious intent. I'm at the game, it all happened directly in front of me. You know, being so quick to call homerism doesn't reflect well upon the accuser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Cooke was going with the two Boston players into the boards. His momentum carried him. It was a board and a half, yes, and fine give him five because he is Cooke. But it is a routine boarding going with the flow of the play and at that point you set a precedent. Marchand went out of his way to cross check a stationary Neal face first into the boards with obvious malicious intent. I'm at the game, it all happened directly in front of me. You know, being so quick to call homerism doesn't reflect well upon the accuser.Yes, I've been the consummate homer throughout this tread, please. Maybe since you're at the game you aren't afforded the constant and varrying replays we at home are. It was a dirty it, plain and simple. There's no such thing as "routine" boarding in 2013. I agree they set the precedent and should've called Marchand's hit consistent to Cooke's, but don't justify it by going with the flow.EDIT: And at this point isn't Marchand a marked man? If he isn't, he should've been before this hit. He's a dirty player, not as famously as Cooke of course, but regardless. I'm surprised he was gifted only 2 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fouhy12 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Cooke was going with the two Boston players into the boards. His momentum carried him. It was a board and a half, yes, and fine give him five because he is Cooke. But it is a routine boarding going with the flow of the play and at that point you set a precedent. Marchand went out of his way to cross check a stationary Neal face first into the boards with obvious malicious intent. I'm at the game, it all happened directly in front of me. You know, being so quick to call homerism doesn't reflect well upon the accuser.Obviously I'm biased, but I try to be as objective as possible. On TV, Cooke's hit looked a lot worse than Marchand's. Marchy made a stupid play and should have gotten 5 for it, but I've seen him make similar hits before. The thing that made it bad was that it was close to the boards and to the back. I think that if that happened in a different place on the ice and to the side, not back, then it is only 2 for interference, max. Cooke has a much worse history, which means he probably gets a one game suspension and Marchy gets a fine. fouhy12's NFL Concepts 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maz Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 I wasn't justifying anything, I was explaining the difference. A board is a board. My gripe was concerned with the uneven handling of the penalties. And jeez, I could probably take a on a Crosby jersey and sock Malkin in the face and you guys would still call me a homer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 This is such a physical series, and the crazy thing is that it's just the first game. It's only going to get nastier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 I wasn't justifying anything, I was explaining the difference. A board is a board. My gripe was concerned with the uneven handling of the penalties. Then we're arguing about agreeing? Okay then. Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fouhy12 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Krejci again! Great forechecking by Horton! fouhy12's NFL Concepts 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 nvm, fouhy beat me to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramerica Industries Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Yikes.2-0 Bruins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 3-0! This is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fouhy12 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Wow... Nice play. fouhy12's NFL Concepts 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorinK29 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Like the kings have a tendency for 1-0 games to get very interesting late, the Bruins have a similar tendency for 3 goal (+games) leads/deficits DON'T TALK TO ME ABOUT HOCKEY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Bruins are looking like a team of destiny again. I think they'll end up lifting the Cup. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramerica Industries Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Bruins are looking like a team of destiny again. I think they'll end up lifting the Cup.Toronto unleashed a monster. G-ddammit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fouhy12 Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 And the mighty Pens get shut out.I don't think the Bruins could have played a better game. There wasn't a weak line or element. Huge props to the PK, Rask, and the Krejci line. fouhy12's NFL Concepts 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.