JQK Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Stay Tuned Sports Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abluecarrot Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Shouldn't it have the GIANTS logo on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarsofthumper Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 it doesn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordsketor Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 The GIANTS logo he means Many thanks to Discrimihater for making the sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger77 Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 The GIANTS logo he meansTHE Giants logo is on it! I don't see another team's. PotD May 11th, 2011looooooogodud: June 7th 2010 - July 5th 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Because they weren't using the "ny" logo, I guess he means. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxColonels Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Does anyone else think it's kind of cheesy to do anniversary patches of Super Bowl victories? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEANS Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 all that beveling reminds me of a New York Rangers kinda vibe, and think they should use the logo they wore back then, not the NY. https://www.andrewsterlachini.com/ or http://dribbble.com/MEANS1974 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Does anyone else think it's kind of cheesy to do anniversary patches of Super Bowl victories?Extremely.But is that what this is? A patch? Or is it just an anniversary logo to put on programs, etc. like the Packers did a couple years ago? The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Does anyone else think it's kind of cheesy to do anniversary patches of Super Bowl victories?Extremely.But is that what this is? A patch? Or is it just an anniversary logo to put on programs, etc. like the Packers did a couple years ago?they better not do it as a patch, these are starting to get ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Somehow I just don't see a traditionally-minded franchise with seven World Championships in its history celebrating any single one of them with a uniform patch. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxColonels Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Does anyone else think it's kind of cheesy to do anniversary patches of Super Bowl victories?Extremely.But is that what this is? A patch? Or is it just an anniversary logo to put on programs, etc. like the Packers did a couple years ago?That I'm ok with. Put it on programs and even stadiums cups. But I definitely think a patch would be cheesy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubsFanBudMan Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Somehow I just don't see a traditionally-minded franchise with seven World Championships in its history celebrating any single one of them with a uniform patch.The Bulls are traditionally-minded and have six titles, and they're doing it this year. I like their logo, but would also prefer it not be a patch. Programs, cups, towels, etc., sure. It presents an interesting question when the next anniversary comes up. For the Bulls, it's next year. Will the Giants trot something like this out again in four years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Thrill Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Because they weren't using the "ny" logo, I guess he means.I've always wanted the Matt Bahr #9 jersey from that year. (Yes, the kicker. It'd blow my buddy's mind.)C'mon, Mitchell & Ness, get on that! :-) Now on Facebook. And Twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Shouldn't it have the GIANTS logo on it?Horribly ugly patch and I agree 100%. It should say GIANTS, not NY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Does anyone else think it's kind of cheesy to do anniversary patches of Super Bowl victories?Yep. I laughed endlessly at the Eagles celebrating 50 years since their pre-Super Bowl Championship. That's no reason for celebration, it's a reason for depression for the long-suffering fans! The franchise just looked pathetic by even pointing it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Well, this spoils soooo many things. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Well, this spoils soooo many things.So what you're saying is... The Giants are a great football team. They are very awesome really, so, Eli, throw it left, or run around the linebacker Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Well, this spoils soooo many things.So what you're saying is... The Giants are a great football team. They are very awesome really, so, Eli, throw it left, or run around the linebacker The Giants are beyond retarded to leaking this logo so early. WTF? ....oh well. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.