mad43dog Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Kobe's hair? definitely an upgrade there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pabig Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 As a Patriots fan, I also have to mention the huge downgrade from the 1995-1999 to the current set. The 0s set had such a beautiful shade of blue and a little more use of red, it was absolutely perfect. Even the huge shoulder logos kinda worked on that set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTnSocal Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 NFL:-Vikings .. I love what they wear now besides the black facemask and the numbers. Either put the serifs on both numbers or none, not just one. Since Nike took over in 2012, the Vikings uniform change is the ONLY one I like.There's only one thing you left out that makes it a complete thumbs-up change ......... the socks for the purple pants, then need to be white at the top, not a continuation of the purple. They could put that shoulder striping in the centre but those socks are just all wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBubba Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 I agree with expos. Their old uniforms in pictures from the 90s look really odd and outdated to me.Bonus points for featuring Randy Johnson as an Expos.----------Speaking of the Lakets, the worst part about their set are the NOBs:Brutal. Nobody cares about your humungous-big signature. PotD: 29/1/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Downgrade ToThat was actually an upgrade. Their "classic" look always looked cheap and amateurish, between the poorly rendered wordmark and those awful drop shadows on the numbers. The current uniforms cleaned up everything that was bad about the previous set without changing too much. About the only things they should change are getting rid of the wishbone collar and using a "LOS ANGELES" wordmark on the road jerseys. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 The updated wordmark is better, the loss of the drop-shadows is most certainly not, and the wishbone collars are awful. All they really had to do was clean up the script. That the Lakers looked a little handmade is something I can't say I'd mind: much like how the Yankees played in a crumbling concrete dump in the Bronx, it kept them grounded. Not looking like a perfectly designed corporate enterprise sort of reminded you that the Lakers were just a team in Los Angeles that people from Los Angeles would like, if that makes any sense. Not sure how Los Angeles would look on the road. Both Lakers uniforms just saying "Lakers" are, sigh, iconic. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBubba Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 There's gotta be a happy medium between having no drop shadow and the over-the-top one they had before.Take the current look, make the numbers purple, add moderate drop-shadows, add neck collars, use a block font for the names, have them be single-ply, and you have a winner. Nobody cares about your humungous-big signature. PotD: 29/1/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonFromMiami Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Problem is, how can you have a WHITE drop shadow , Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Not sure how Los Angeles would look on the road. Both Lakers uniforms just saying "Lakers" are, sigh, iconic.I don't think the purple ones are particularly iconic. The gold ones are, to be sure, but they still managed to change the color and style of the numbers, and change the whole shape of it, while retaining its iconic-ness. I think they could easily change the road wordmark. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poser Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 DowngradeDowngradeUpgrade (over previous set but downgrade from original jersey) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martymcfry Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 This:To this:Is huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 Upgrade (over previous set but downgrade from original jersey)I'd argue that the latest incarnation of the Sharks set is a downgrade from what was released in 07. Waist stripes are important and there was no need for them to adopt a laceup collar. Had they just eliminated the shoulder yoke and left everything else as is, I would agree with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonFromMiami Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Sharks should just go back to first jersey set, including original logo- - And look at the CCM on the hemline, embroidered black, black, teal CCM and then the old NHL shield, just :censored:ing beautiful......i love that it was team/color coordinated, like the batter logo on MLB jerseys of today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.