jlog3000 Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Since this is the Pointless Realignment sub-forum, I was wondering if I can add a little WNBA flavor by the following: Eastern Conference: Atlantic Division: *Connecticut Sun *New York Liberty *Washington Mystics *Charlotte Sting - returning team *Miami Tropics - returning team, but renamed *Orlando Miracle - returning team Central Division: *Atlanta Dream *Chicago Sky *Indiana Fever *Cleveland Rockers - returning team *Detroit Mechanics - returning team, but renamed *Milwaukee Stallions - expansion team Western Conference: Midwest Division: *Minnesota Lynx *San Antonio Silver Stars *Tulsa Shock *Houston Comets - returning team *Utah Bluezz - returning team, but renamed *Dallas Longhorns - expansion team Pacific Division: * Los Angeles Sparks * Phoenix Mercury * Seattle Storm * Portland Fire - returning team * Sacramento Monarchs - returning team * Bay Area Knights - expansion team Schedule format: Division play - 5 x 4 (2 home/2 road) = 20 games Non-division play - 6 x 2 (1 home/1 road) = 12 games Non-conference play - 12 x 1 = 12 games [home-and-home basis will rotate per every two years] Total games: 44 Your thoughts about this guys? Quote Florida State Seminoles fan for life (mostly on football, basketball and baseball)! 2011-12 ACC men's basketball conference tournament champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football Atlantic Division champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football regular season champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football conference bowl tournament champions; 2014 NCAA D-I FBS BCS national champions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soarindude Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Since this is the Pointless Realignment sub-forum, I was wondering if I can add a little WNBA flavor by the following:Eastern Conference:Atlantic Division:*Connecticut Sun*New York Liberty*Washington Mystics*Charlotte Sting - returning team*Miami Tropics - returning team, but renamed*Orlando Miracle - returning teamCentral Division:*Atlanta Dream*Chicago Sky*Indiana Fever*Cleveland Rockers - returning team*Detroit Mechanics - returning team, but renamed*Milwaukee Stallions - expansion teamWestern Conference:Midwest Division:*Minnesota Lynx*San Antonio Silver Stars*Tulsa Shock*Houston Comets - returning team*Utah Bluezz - returning team, but renamed*Dallas Longhorns - expansion teamPacific Division:* Los Angeles Sparks* Phoenix Mercury* Seattle Storm* Portland Fire - returning team* Sacramento Monarchs - returning team* Bay Area Knights - expansion teamSchedule format:Division play - 5 x 4 (2 home/2 road) = 20 gamesNon-division play - 6 x 2 (1 home/1 road) = 12 gamesNon-conference play - 12 x 1 = 12 games [home-and-home basis will rotate per every two years]Total games: 44Your thoughts about this guys?My only thoughts are on the sudden peak of interest in the WNBA for all this to actually happen .Jokes aside, decent job. Not a big fan of the name Detroit Mechanics for a WNBA team though, seeing as the male demographic dominates in that job industry. I'm just not sure it's a good name to reflect the team. Alignment wise, excellent. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlog3000 Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Since this is the Pointless Realignment sub-forum, I was wondering if I can add a little WNBA flavor by the following: Eastern Conference: Atlantic Division: *Connecticut Sun *New York Liberty *Washington Mystics *Charlotte Sting - returning team *Miami Tropics - returning team, but renamed *Orlando Miracle - returning team Central Division: *Atlanta Dream *Chicago Sky *Indiana Fever *Cleveland Rockers - returning team *Detroit Mechanics - returning team, but renamed *Milwaukee Stallions - expansion team Western Conference: Midwest Division: *Minnesota Lynx *San Antonio Silver Stars *Tulsa Shock *Houston Comets - returning team *Utah Bluezz - returning team, but renamed *Dallas Longhorns - expansion team Pacific Division: * Los Angeles Sparks * Phoenix Mercury * Seattle Storm * Portland Fire - returning team * Sacramento Monarchs - returning team * Bay Area Knights - expansion team Schedule format: Division play - 5 x 4 (2 home/2 road) = 20 games Non-division play - 6 x 2 (1 home/1 road) = 12 games Non-conference play - 12 x 1 = 12 games [home-and-home basis will rotate per every two years] Total games: 44 Your thoughts about this guys? My only thoughts are on the sudden peak of interest in the WNBA for all this to actually happen . Jokes aside, decent job. Not a big fan of the name Detroit Mechanics for a WNBA team though, seeing as the male demographic dominates in that job industry. I'm just not sure it's a good name to reflect the team. Alignment wise, excellent. Thanks. When it comes to alignment and expansion talk, it's the least I can do. And I have to give you credit for acknowledging about the "renamings" like the "Detroit Mechanics". To be honest, I couldn't find anything feminine (but powerful) to mirror/reflect to its NBA counterpart; plus any unique way to de-sync out the Miami Soul, Detroit Shock and Utah Starzz. But at least I'm trying my hardest. Quote Florida State Seminoles fan for life (mostly on football, basketball and baseball)! 2011-12 ACC men's basketball conference tournament champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football Atlantic Division champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football regular season champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football conference bowl tournament champions; 2014 NCAA D-I FBS BCS national champions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdm1219inpenna Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 As a follow-up to my 32 team MLB re-alignment post, here are the caps in the new divisional alignment:I gave the Orioles back their cap from what they had just prior to going back to the grinning cartoonish bird. The Red Sox caps would be red again, as they were from 1975-78. I think they looked really sharp, and still do. The Blue Jays would go back to the white panel on their caps and have the 1977-96 logo.The Charlotte Knights cap was easy to create, using their logo on a cap template. Team colors gold and black with a touch of silver for the head of armor. The person who made that Indians logo did a really nice and brilliant job. I never liked the Chief Wahoo logo, even when I was a kid growing up in the 1970s, I thought it was really goofy looking. I didn't have room for a 2 cap scenario, but only the Tigers would have 2 different caps in my baseball world. The white "D" for home games, and the orange "D" (showcased here) for their road games. The Twins cap would have the white panel again, with the interlocking "TC". This would be used for both home and away games. The Texas Rangers would have blue caps, with the red "T". I never liked the red caps that the Rangers adopted back in I guess 1994.The Anaheim Angels (no more of this Los Angeles of Anaheim hooey) would go back to having a navy cap with a red brim. Again, I never liked nor embraced their red caps. Too many red teams in the American League. The Diamondbacks cap is black with their "A" logo on it and the reddish/orange brim. In the National League, the Nationals would always have a navy cap with a red brim. I dislike that there are so many "red" teams now in baseball. To me the Red Sox, the Reds and the Cardinals should have red, and that's it. For the Phillies, I married their current cap logo with their previous burgundy colored caps. I always have loathed the Phillies (all Philadelphia teams), but loved it when they had a distinct color. The re-branded Expos expansion team would go back to their 1970s & 80s cap, with the white panel in the front and the MLB logo. The Pittsburgh Pirates caps would harken back to the days of Clemente in the early 1970s, with the mustard gold caps and the black P on it. The Florida Marlins (not Miami in my world) would go back to their original logo, and have the teal cap with black brim. Again, this was nice as it gave them some distinction.The Brewers cap I made more of a bluish/purple hue. It might only be me but during the 1970s and early 80s, those Brewers caps looked almost purple to me. I made the "M" a more yellow hue. The Houston Astros would always have the orange caps. Again I loved that they had a distinct color.In the NL West, the Padres would go back to their brown/orange/gold look. Again very distinct! The current set is about as thrilling as watching paint dry in my opinion. The San Francisco Giants' caps would always have the orange brim. So there you have it, my re-aligned world showcased by how I'd want the MLB caps to look. Only division winners would advance to the post-season. Best 3 out of 5 series to determine the East & West champions. Best 4 out of 7 for the LCS and of course 4 out of 7 for the World Series. I'd simply alternate every year who was home team for the extra game in these post-season series, rather than have it based on record, but that could still apply I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daily Horoscope Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 AFC merges with OFC and CAF, CONCACAF merges with CONMEBOL, UEFA stays the same10 teams from 3 confederationshosts plus previous World Cup winner-host and prev WC champ get bye into second round:-10 groups of 3, group winners advance-2nd round: 12 teams in 4 groups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 max, we meet again. Quote https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdm1219inpenna Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 The "New" USFL (taking teams from the 1983-85 league). I contracted the Jacksonville Bulls, Oklahoma Outlaws and (insert city name here) Breakers. FYI and historical context, the Breakers were in Boston in 1983, New Orleans in 1984 and Portland, Oregon in 1985, hence the sarcastic (insert city name here) disclaimer.Atlantic Division - New Jersey Generals, Philadelphia Stars, Pittsburgh Maulers, Washington FederalsSouthern Division - Birmingham Stallions, Orlando Renegades, Memphis Showboats, Tampa Bay BanditsCentral Division - Chicago Blitz, Michigan Panthers, Houston Gamblers (sorry the helmet i just noticed was a bit sliced), San Antonio GunslingersPacific Division - Arizona Wranglers, Denver Gold, Los Angeles Express, Oakland Invaders18 game season (which is what the old USFL had). Each team plays 2 games against its 3 division opponents, home and away, and each team plays 1 game vs. the other 12, 6 at home 6 on the road on an alternating basis (e.g. New Jersey would play at Oakland one season, the next year Oakland would play at New Jersey).Just like the NFL, there would be 6 playoff spots. The 4 division winners seeded 1-4, and 2 wildcards.Wildcard Weekend 6 seed at 3 seed and 5 seed at 4 seed.Divisional Playoffs 6,5 or 4 seed at 1 seed, and 5,4, or 3 seed at 2 seed.USFL Championship Game - Neutral Site. No "bye" week between the Divisional Playoffs and the Championship Game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generalshepherd141 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 NHL with a few changes:Predators and Coyotes are contracted*Panthers move to Quebec*Hurricanes move to Portland*Devils move to Seattle*Blue Jackets move to Hamilton*Lightning move to HoustonAtlantic Division:Boston BruinsBuffalo SabresHamilton TigersMontreal CanadiensOttawa SenatorsQuebec NordiquesToronto Maple LeafsEast Division:Chicago BlackhawksDetroit Red WingsNew York IslandersNew York RangersPhiladelphia FlyersPittsburgh PenguinsWashington CapitalsWest Division:Calgary FlamesDallas StarsEdmonton OilersHouston AerosMinnesota WildSt. Louis BluesWinnipeg JetsPacific Division:Anaheim DucksColorado AvalancheLos Angeles KingsPortland HurricanesSan Jose SharksSeattle MetropolitansVancouver Canucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moser316 Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Okay, I'll bite. I've been working on an idea for a 40-team MLB Super League (possibly for a project if I ever get enough time), and I think I finally have it perfected. Assuming no teams have to relocate, that would make for 10 new expansion teams, which I tried to divvy up equally among the eight five-team divisions (by necessity, two divisions have two expansion teams each, but every other division has one). I also tried, where possible, to keep teams within the same time zone together, and if there is a time difference between any of the teams in a division, it's only one hour (the main reason why Cincinnati ended up in the NL Southeast instead of the NL Central in this realignment). Without further adieu, the results:AMERICAN LEAGUEAtlantic DivisionBaltimore OriolesBoston Red SoxCarolina Mudcats (expansion)New York YankeesTampa Bay Rays Great Lakes DivisionChicago White SoxCleveland IndiansDetroit TigersIndianapolis Arrows (expansion)Toronto Blue Jays Midwest DivisionHouston AstrosKansas City RoyalsMinnesota TwinsOklahoma Roughnecks (expansion)Texas Rangers Pacific DivisionLas Vegas Gamblers (expansion)Los Angeles AngelsOakland AthleticsSeattle MarinersVancouver Mounties (expansion) NATIONAL LEAGUENortheast DivisionMontreal Expos (expansion)New York MetsPhiladelphia PhilliesPittsburgh PiratesWashington Nationals Southeast DivisionAtlanta BravesCincinnati RedsMiami MarlinsNashville Sounds (expansion)New Orleans Crescents (expansion) Central DivisionChicago CubsColorado RockiesMilwaukee BrewersSan Antonio Missions (expansion)St. Louis Cardinals Western DivisionArizona DiamondbacksLos Angeles DodgersPortland Beavers (expansion)San Diego PadresSan Francisco Giants There were quite a few cities considered for this project that didn't make the cut for various reasons. Here they are: DMA Size Too SmallAlbuquerque, NM (47th)Des Moines, IA (72nd)Jacksonville, FL (50th)Omaha, NE (75th) Proximity To Other Teams (Existing or Expansion)Buffalo, NY (too close to Toronto, Pittsburgh, and Cleveland)Charlotte, NC (too close to Atlanta and Raleigh/Durham)Columbus, OH (too close to Cincinnati and Cleveland)Louisville, KY (too close to Cincinnati and Indianapolis)Memphis, TN (too close to St. Louis and Nashville)Norfolk, VA (too close to Raleigh/Durham and Washington) Travel Costs ProhibitiveHonolulu, HI There was one odd city out in my final decision between three markets (Oklahoma City, Salt Lake City, and San Antonio), and it ended up being Salt Lake City. My rationale for this was that Oklahoma City is essentially a one-horse town (the Thunder), and that horse is active in the fall, winter, and spring (mostly). Salt Lake City has Real Salt Lake to occupy the summer months, and the Jazz to occupy the winter months. I wouldn't think Salt Lake City would work as a three-team market, so I gave teams to the one-team markets, Oklahoma City and San Antonio (who has been angling for MLB for the past few years). Some of the other tough decisions were Raleigh/Durham over Charlotte (similar DMA size, but Charlotte has two major league teams to Raleigh/Durham's one), Indianapolis over Louisville (Indianapolis is a larger DMA, and Louisville is most definitely Reds territory), and Nashville over Memphis (Nashville is the larger DMA by a wide enough margin). Albuquerque and Jacksonville are interesting cases, as well. Both cities have larger DMAs than my smallest market (New Orleans, 51st), but didn't end up with teams. Jacksonville is hemmed in geographically by the Braves, Rays, and the Marlins (not to mention the Atlantic Ocean) so they would face the same issues that Milwaukee does by its proximity to Chicago, the Twin Cities, and Lake Michigan. Albuquerque's DMA covers pretty much the entire state of New Mexico, leaving very few options in the way of adjacent DMAs to draw from. New Orleans would most likely draw from both Louisiana and Mississippi (and possibly southern Alabama and the Florida panhandle), giving them more future potential than the two markets mentioned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlog3000 Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 This might be a bit pointless, but I'm about to share something interesting. Perhaps this is some serious retrospective dreaming but what if back at the formation of the original Big East football conference instead of the Big East taking the conference under its umbrella the three schools that sponsored the sport at the time (Boston College, Syracuse and Pittsburgh) would have left the league and instead founded a new league with the best of the independents. At the time, those 3 schools only represented 1/3rd of Big East membership and the basketball schools could have flat out said no to the notion of a football league. The new conference might have included: Boston College Syracuse Pittsburgh Rutgers (from A-10) Temple (from A-10) West Virginia (from A-10) Virginia Tech (from Metro) Cincinnati (from Metro) Louisville (from Metro) Memphis (from Metro) Miami (FL) (from Indy status) If a 12th acceptable member could be found, such as East Carolina, then division play and a conference title game could have been in place. However, if that might had happened, what would be the future of the A-10, the Metro and the old Big East (before adding football) for the 1991-92 season? Would there be a merger between the A-10 and the old Big East to form a basketball-spekked all-sports super-conference? Take a look at what would have happened with those remaining schools after those leaving their respective conferences: A-10: Penn St.*, Duquesne, George Washington, UMass*, St. Bonaventure, Rhode Island*, St. Joseph's Big East (1979-2013): UConn*, Georgetown, Providence, St. John's, Seton Hall, Villanova* Metro: Tulane*, Southern Miss*; later add UNC-Charlotte, UAB and USF (who would eventually become football-playing schools), and possibly East Carolina* (from the CAA) By the way, the asterisk means that it's a school with football (FBS or FCS level), just to point that out. Back with the member list for a Eastern-spekked/based football conference, I would prefer to put Penn St. as the possible 12th member instead of East Carolina; and the divisions would go as follows: North: Boston College, Syracuse, Pitt, Penn St., Rutgers, Temple South: Miami, Memphis, Louisville, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Cincinnati But if it's East Carolina, then it would be like this: North: Boston College, Syracuse, Pitt, Penn St., Rutgers, Temple, Cincinnati South: Miami, Memphis, Louisville, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, East Carolina Quote Florida State Seminoles fan for life (mostly on football, basketball and baseball)! 2011-12 ACC men's basketball conference tournament champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football Atlantic Division champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football regular season champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football conference bowl tournament champions; 2014 NCAA D-I FBS BCS national champions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichiganPackers Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 NBA with American and National conferences instead of Eastern and WesternAmerican Basketball ConferenceNorthMilwaukee BucksMontreal Expos (expansion franchise)New York KnicksSpirits of St. Louis (expansion franchise)SouthHouston RocketsNew Orleans PelicansOklahoma City ThunderSan Antonio SpursEastBoston CelticsCleveland CavaliersMemphis Panthers (Grizzlies renamed)Miami HeatWestDenver NuggetsGolden State WarriorsLos Angeles LakersPhoenix SunsNational Basketball ConferenceNorthChicago BullsDetroit PistonsIndiana PacersMinnesota TimberwolvesSouthAtlanta HawksCharlotte Hornets (finally finished the rebrand)Dallas MavericksOrlando MagicEastBrooklyn NetsPhiladelphia 76ersToronto RaptorsWashington WizardsWestPortland TrailblazersSeattle Super Sonics (Sacramento Kings relocated)Utah JazzVancouver Grizzlies (Los Angeles Clippers relocated) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Kings got a new arena deal. They aren't going anywhere. And the Clippers aren't dumb enough to leave the second largest market for a market that previously lasted less than 10 years.Those are just a couple glaring issues with this plan. Quote https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichiganPackers Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Yeah, it was a pretty off the cuff plan with no forethought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(probably)notabandwagonfan Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Why rename the Grizzlies and not the Jazz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Why rename the Grizzlies and not the Jazz? I've always thought that Charlotte should be the the Hornets (like they are now), Utah be the Bobcats, and New Orleans be the Jazz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlog3000 Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 What would have happened to conference realignment during the 2013-14 season, involving the old Big East and the Big XII? It would consist of the following: Big XII would add Louisville and Cincinnati from old Big East (along with West Virginia), and TCU from the MW: Big XII North: Kansas, Kansas St., Iowa St., West Virginia, Louisville, Cincinnati Big XII South: Texas, Texas Tech, Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St., TCU Old Big East (now AAC) would NOT have lost Syracuse and Pitt (leaving the ACC and the B1G with 12 still); but would have gained Houston, SMU, UCF, Temple, and Memphis: AAC: Syracuse, Pitt, UConn, USF, Rutgers, Houston, SMU, UCF, Temple, Memphis Later for 2014-15, the AAC would have a CCG with additions of East Carolina, Tulsa and Tulane (maybe another school like Marshall), and Navy as a fb-only member out of the question: AAC North: Syracuse, Pitt, UConn, Rutgers, Temple, Marshall, East Carolina AAC South: Houston, SMU, UCF, USF, Memphis, Tulsa, Tulane This would leave Maryland still in the ACC, but Notre Dame would be Independent for all sports. In case the ACC needs new members for the 2015-16 season, then it would be Pitt, Syracuse, Rutgers (from the AAC) and West Virginia (from the Big XII); after that, the AAC would gain either UAB or Southern Miss, while the Big XII would gain Marshall. Your thoughts? Quote Florida State Seminoles fan for life (mostly on football, basketball and baseball)! 2011-12 ACC men's basketball conference tournament champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football Atlantic Division champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football regular season champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football conference bowl tournament champions; 2014 NCAA D-I FBS BCS national champions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 How do you know that would've happened? Quote https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlog3000 Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 How do you know that would've happened? I was just assuming as if it did happen, RIGHT before the 2012-13 or 2011-12 seasons. I posted this as part of this topic for a reason. Quote Florida State Seminoles fan for life (mostly on football, basketball and baseball)! 2011-12 ACC men's basketball conference tournament champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football Atlantic Division champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football regular season champions; 2012, 2013 & 2014 ACC football conference bowl tournament champions; 2014 NCAA D-I FBS BCS national champions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 How I think college football should be (FBS):AAC:South FloridaEast CarolinaTulsaTempleMemphisHoustonCincinnatiTulaneBoston CollegeFAUOhioAppalachian StateToledoAdditions: Boston College, FAU, Ohio, Appalachian State, ToledoSubtractions: UCF, Connecticut , SMUACC:Florida StateLouisvilleNorth Carolina StateWake ForestSyracuseGeorgia TechDukeNorth CarolinaPittsburghVirginiaVirginia TechMiami (FL)UCFConnecticutAdditions: UCF, ConneticutSubtractions: Boston College, ClemsonBig 12:Oklahoma StateOklahomaTexasWest VirginiaKansasKansas StateTexas TechSMURiceColoradoBYULA TechAdditions: SMU, Rice, Colorado, BYU, LA TechSubtractions: Iowa State, TCU, BaylorB1G:IndianaMarylandMichigan StateMichiganRutgersOhio StatePenn StateNorthwesternMinnesotaNebraskaWisconsinIllinoisAdditions: N/ASubtractions: Purdue, IowaCUSA:UABWestern KentuckyMarshallOld DominionFIUMiddle TennesseeNorth TexasSouthern MissUTSAUTEPIowa StateAdditions: Iowa StateSubtractions: FAU, Rice, LA TechMid-American:UMassBowling GreenMiami (OH)AkronBuffaloKent StateBall StateCentral MichiganEastern MichiganNorthern IllinoisWestern MichiganWyomingAdditions: WyomingSubtractions: Ohio, ToledoMountain West:San Diego StateSan Jose StateHawaiiFresno StateUNLVNevadaColorado StateBoise StateNew MexicoUtah StateIowaNorth Dakota StateAdditions: Iowa, North Dakota State (Yes an FCS school makes the leap)Subtractions: Air Force, WyomingPac 12:StanfordCaliforniaOregon StateWashingtonWashington StateOregonArizonaArizona StateUCLAUSCUtahBaylorAdditions: BaylorSubtractions: ColoradoSEC:FloridaGeorgiaKentuckyMissouriVanderbiltSouth CarolinaTennesseeAuburnArkansasLSUOle MissTexas A&MAlabamaMississippi StateClemsonTCUAdditions: Clemson, TCUSubtractions: N/A (It's a sin to leave the SEC apparently)Sun Belt:South AlabamaIdahoNew Mexico StateGeorgia SouthernLouisiana-LafayetteTexas StateArkansas StateGeorgia StateLouisiana-MonroeTroyAdditions: N/ASubtractions: Appalachian StateIndependents:Notre DameArmyNavyAir ForcePurdueAdditions: Air Force, PurdueSubtractions: BYU*Most of this realignment probably has no possibility of happening, I just tried to make all the conferences even (sort of) and have the correct number of teams associated with conference name (Besides B1G because I couldn't find conferences to put some of those teams already in the conference* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted July 6, 2014 Share Posted July 6, 2014 If the Big Ten was paring down teams they'd eject Maryland before tossing Purdue. Quote On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.