MJWalker45 Posted October 7, 2023 Author Share Posted October 7, 2023 31 minutes ago, McCall said: I looked it up and it says Saudi Arabia is in AFC. Well that should rule China out. I've also seen a bunch of Concacaf countries are already backing Saudi Arabia for 2034 as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted October 7, 2023 Author Share Posted October 7, 2023 2 hours ago, BrySmalls said: Here's a simple solution to subverting the Asian continent conundrum: Put the 2038 World Cup in Australia and New Zealand! If the Women's competition was hosted there, then those two countries can host the Men's competition. I don't think they're bidding, but it would work. I wonder how many of those stadiums would have to be expanded more for the men? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted October 8, 2023 Share Posted October 8, 2023 22 hours ago, MJWalker45 said: I don't think they're bidding, but it would work. I wonder how many of those stadiums would have to be expanded more for the men? That's a good question. Most of the stadiums used for this past Women's World Cup lowered their total capacity for the matches. However, that's not saying much as a few stadiums had low capacity to begin with. Here's a closer look at the stadium's capacities: It's reasonable to assume that the potential venue for the Men's World Cup Final would be Stadium Australia. As per Wikipedia, this stadium boasts a maximum capacity of 82,500* for sports events with a rectangular field configuration. However, it can be adjusted to accommodate up to 115,000** (utilized during the 2000 Summer Olympics). From the list provided, it seems that at least seven stadiums would need significant enhancements to accommodate large audiences of 50,000+ for the matches. Additionally, with the expansion of the Men's World Cup to 48 teams, it is possible that three more stadiums will be added to this list: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted October 8, 2023 Author Share Posted October 8, 2023 2 hours ago, BrySmalls said: That's a good question. Most of the stadiums used for this past Women's World Cup lowered their total capacity for the matches. However, that's not saying much as a few stadiums had low capacity to begin with. Here's a closer look at the stadium's capacities: It's reasonable to assume that the potential venue for the Men's World Cup Final would be Stadium Australia. As per Wikipedia, this stadium boasts a maximum capacity of 82,500* for sports events with a rectangular field configuration. However, it can be adjusted to accommodate up to 115,000** (utilized during the 2000 Summer Olympics). From the list provided, it seems that at least seven stadiums would need significant enhancements to accommodate large audiences of 50,000+ for the matches. Additionally, with the expansion of the Men's World Cup to 48 teams, it is possible that three more stadiums will be added to this list: I think finding another partner nation would be needed to, based on costs for temporary or permanent construction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 https://theathletic.com/live-blogs/world-cup-2026-schedule-announcement-live-updates-final/r7oDr4oG9qK4/ Mexico (Azteca) will host the first match on 11 June 2026. Canada (Toronto) and the USA (SoFi) play the next day. MetLife will host the final, Atlanta and Dallas get the semi-finals. Miami will host the third place game. USMNT will play two games at SoFi and one game in Seattle. Canada plays one game in Toronto and two games in Vancouver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDAWG Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 1 hour ago, MJWalker45 said: https://theathletic.com/live-blogs/world-cup-2026-schedule-announcement-live-updates-final/r7oDr4oG9qK4/ Mexico (Azteca) will host the first match on 11 June 2026. Canada (Toronto) and the USA (SoFi) play the next day. MetLife will host the final, Atlanta and Dallas get the semi-finals. Miami will host the third place game. USMNT will play two games at SoFi and one game in Seattle. Canada plays one game in Toronto and two games in Vancouver. North America won't be confused as to what to do with those stadiums once the World Cup ends. FIFA will be like "Okay LIGA MX, Toronto FC, Vancouver Whitecaps and the NFL, you can have your stadiums back." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 2 hours ago, GDAWG said: North America won't be confused as to what to do with those stadiums once the World Cup ends. FIFA will be like "Okay LIGA MX, Toronto FC, Vancouver Whitecaps and the NFL, you can have your stadiums back." NFL will be like, "We don't need 'em yet". NFL players will be like, "Keep 'em longer. F*** preseason games". 1 Quote https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Digby Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 Kinda surprised that MetLife gets the final, although I suppose it makes sense to nudge it as east as possible for timezone reasons, and you can't beat New York from a hosting amenities perspective, even though public transit from there to MetLife is a nightmare. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sykotyk Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 3 hours ago, Digby said: Kinda surprised that MetLife gets the final, although I suppose it makes sense to nudge it as east as possible for timezone reasons, and you can't beat New York from a hosting amenities perspective, even though public transit from there to MetLife is a nightmare. Noon kickoff in MetLife. 9am pacific. Gives Europe an early evening to late evening kick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted February 5 Author Share Posted February 5 Game times won't be locked in until the draw, but we have the full stadium calendar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDAWG Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Due to FIFA Rules, the NFL Stadiums and BMO Field will be temporarily renamed: AT&T Stadium (Dallas Stadium) BMO Field (Toronto Stadium) GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium (Kansas City Stadium) Gillette Stadium (Boston Stadium) Hard Rock Stadium (Miami Stadium) Levi’s Stadium (San Francisco Bay Area Stadium) Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia Stadium) Lumen Field (Seattle Stadium) Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta Stadium) MetLife Stadium (New York New Jersey Stadium) NRG Stadium (Houston Stadium) SoFi Stadium (Los Angeles Stadium) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 5 minutes ago, GDAWG said: Due to FIFA Rules, the NFL Stadiums and BMO Field will be temporarily renamed: AT&T Stadium (Dallas Stadium) BMO Field (Toronto Stadium) GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium (Kansas City Stadium) Gillette Stadium (Boston Stadium) Hard Rock Stadium (Miami Stadium) Levi’s Stadium (San Francisco Bay Area Stadium) Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia Stadium) Lumen Field (Seattle Stadium) Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta Stadium) MetLife Stadium (New York New Jersey Stadium) NRG Stadium (Houston Stadium) SoFi Stadium (Los Angeles Stadium) I wonder how the naming rights holders feel about this? Is there anything in their contracts that will require a 'make good' by each of the stadium owners? Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 2 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said: I wonder how the naming rights holders feel about this? Is there anything in their contracts that will require a 'make good' by each of the stadium owners? That's a possibility, but it could be dictated in the contracts that if events are hosted at the stadium that require the standard name to be replaced for generic names there is no fiscal responsibility by either side. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 13 minutes ago, TBGKon said: That's a possibility, but it could be dictated in the contracts that if events are hosted at the stadium that require the standard name to be replaced for generic names there is no fiscal responsibility by either side. If I'm AT&T, for example, I'm not sure I sign that contract with that provision. Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 14 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said: If I'm AT&T, for example, I'm not sure I sign that contract with that provision. Its protocol in every World Cup to temporarily rename the stadiums as FIFA controls specific sponsors. It dates as far back as the 2006 event in Germany from what I can tell. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 4 minutes ago, TBGKon said: Its protocol in every World Cup to temporarily rename the stadiums as FIFA controls specific sponsors. It dates as far back as the 2006 event in Germany from what I can tell. Thanks - it's outside of my norm, so I didn't know that. Presumably then it is written into a contract like that. Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruttep Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 1 hour ago, Sec19Row53 said: (New York New Jersey Stadium) Nobody in New Jersey is happy about being called "New York New Jersey" lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted February 7 Author Share Posted February 7 15 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said: I wonder how the naming rights holders feel about this? Is there anything in their contracts that will require a 'make good' by each of the stadium owners? 14 hours ago, TBGKon said: Its protocol in every World Cup to temporarily rename the stadiums as FIFA controls specific sponsors. It dates as far back as the 2006 event in Germany from what I can tell. 14 hours ago, ruttep said: Nobody in New Jersey is happy about being called "New York New Jersey" lol 15 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said: If I'm AT&T, for example, I'm not sure I sign that contract with that provision. Since this has been the way in FIFA forever, probably not. Sometimes a stadium "forgets" to cover the stadium sponsors logos and get a talking to. AT&T also has a soda deal with Pepsi, but will have to serve Coca Cola during World Cup games due to sponsorship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampyrRabbit Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 On 2024-02-05 at 6:23 PM, MJWalker45 said: Game times won't be locked in until the draw, but we have the full stadium calendar. And to what should be the surprise of no one, the US gets almost everything past the round of 32. 16 hours ago, GDAWG said: Due to FIFA Rules, the NFL Stadiums and BMO Field will be temporarily renamed: AT&T Stadium (Dallas Stadium) What exactly was wrong with "Jerryworld" or "The Death Star"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted February 7 Author Share Posted February 7 54 minutes ago, VampyrRabbit said: And to what should be the surprise of no one, the US gets almost everything past the round of 32. What exactly was wrong with "Jerryworld" or "The Death Star"? This was pretty much known going in, because this was agreed ahead of time. It's why Azteca hosts the first game instead of SoFi. As far as the nicknames, Fox is still covering this World Cup so I'd expect them to still call it by those names, especially that mop headed goofball that made a career out of a middling national team career. At least until FIFA complains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.