RookieOfTheYear Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 ya, i like what i did to it, but i know no one else is gonna. but ill post it anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steiny_ramone Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 maroon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RookieOfTheYear Posted March 18, 2006 Author Share Posted March 18, 2006 i also got rid of the eyepatch, maroon isnt the only way i butchered it lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHcreative Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 Okay...First: Why maroon?Second: You can't have a 'Raider' without an eyepatchThird: Why does it say 'Raiders' twice?Fourth: Why are the D's different colors? ANDFifth: What were you thinking?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uniguy22 Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 Okay...First: Why maroon?Second: You can't have a 'Raider' without an eyepatchThird: Why does it say 'Raiders' twice?Fourth: Why are the D's different colors? ANDFifth: What were you thinking?!? Those are some good questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RookieOfTheYear Posted March 18, 2006 Author Share Posted March 18, 2006 Okay...First: Why maroon?Answer: Maroon just cuz i like itSecond: You can't have a 'Raider' without an eyepatch. Answer: where is that rule?Third: Why does it say 'Raiders' twice? Answer: i messed up , i just wanted the black one to be thereFourth: Why are the D's different colors? Answer: i thought maybe a different coloered D might liven it up a bitANDFifth: What were you thinking?!? Answer: lol, i wasnt i was bored, and thorugh it together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurnTwo Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 Fifth: What were you thinking?!? Answer: lol, i wasnt i was bored, and thorugh it together People around here generally don't like stuff that you "thorugh" together. Take your time. I'm not trying to be mean but do you honestly think that is an improvement over the current logo? Does that design make any sense whatsoever? Does the D being a different color than the rest of the wordmark seem logical AT ALL? Think before you post. Now, if you can come up with a valid concept, worthy of constructive criticism, I will not hesitate to tell you what I think needs to be improved on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VitaminD Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 Shoddy stuff, my man.So the black is gone from the Silver & Black... except on the Raider's facial features and 6/7 of the team name. Why?In getting rid of the eyepatch, your Raider now has two left eyes, right down to the eyebrow, the creases of the eyes, the cheekbone and lacrimal carnucle (where the lacrimal duct opens onto the surface of the eye, where tears come from).You also didn't finish your recolorization; there's a jagged black outline on his face, and white spaces inside his chinstrap.With a name like "RookieOfTheYear", you'd expect more than this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampman Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 Well I think the real Raiders logo needs an upgrade--he looks wimpy.So yes they need an upgrade--but this is not it.(They'd never go for maroon, and 2 left eyes?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninersdd Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 Well I think the real Raiders logo needs an upgrade--he looks wimpy.So yes they need an upgrade--but this is not it.(They'd never go for maroon, and 2 left eyes?) not just wimpy, but blind also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coast2CoastAM2006 Posted March 18, 2006 Share Posted March 18, 2006 it also to some extent screams 49ers but with silver. sorta like the 49ers and raiders merged. i would suggest dropping the red/maroon from the scheme. i would go with gold but use it as simple trim. my other suggestion is to make it meaner, which is probably my whole issue with the raiders logo. which is it looks like it belongs to a set of fans from a totally different generation. its almost too conservative for the current generation of fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHcreative Posted March 19, 2006 Share Posted March 19, 2006 Okay...First: Why maroon?Second: You can't have a 'Raider' without an eyepatchThird: Why does it say 'Raiders' twice?Fourth: Why are the D's different colors? ANDFifth: What were you thinking?!? Those are some good questions. I try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert89 Posted March 19, 2006 Share Posted March 19, 2006 Keep original logo, and add the maroon to it then, and it may be kind of nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filliam H. Muffman Posted March 21, 2006 Share Posted March 21, 2006 Al Davis is gonna sue Seriously, I'd have to agree with the guy above. Keep the original and then add the maroon and it would look much better. Still, it's better than anything I could have done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted March 21, 2006 Share Posted March 21, 2006 Looks like the guy is really sleepy and just cant wake up. Accually, that pretty accurately reflects the Raiders since XXXVII. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted March 21, 2006 Share Posted March 21, 2006 Looks like the guy is really sleepy and just cant wake up. Accually, that pretty accurately reflects the Raiders since XXXVII. To quote Bill Parcells, "No disrepect to the Orientals", but the Raider he kinda looks Asian to me. But seriously, the red D and changing the shield to an oval, not happening bro. If the Raiders are to do anything to their logo, it would be to change "Raider" to Jim Rome under the helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.