The Fonz Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Looks like the fleeces (the pullovers mlb players wear in dugout) are a little different this year...there are two varieties: short sleeve and long sleeve: here are the Mets ones:Long sleeved:Short sleeved (they only have the black one at the moment for mets, im sure blue will be seen instore for sale)here is a different short sleeve one just so you can compare with a different color, so imagine the NY instead of the blue jay logo:personally, im not digging the new long sleeved ones..i loved the ones from the last two years (I own both the mets black and blue ones).but i do love the new short sleeved ones and I'm sure to get a blue one. New York Mets & New York Jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSox44 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I always loved the old fleeces with the cap logo on the collar.These are a massive downgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDwas Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Where are these images coming from/where can I see more? Tomorrow's just your future yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bouj Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Where are these images coming from/where can I see more?MLB Shop. They have most of the SS versions and some of the LS ones. Go Astros!Go Texans!Go Rockets!Go Javelinas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Just another example of how you shouldn't fix things if they aren't broken. The pullovers of the last few seasons with the cap logos centered at the neck area were great and didn't really need a change IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fonz Posted February 15, 2012 Author Share Posted February 15, 2012 Just another example of how you shouldn't fix things if they aren't broken. The pullovers of the last few seasons with the cap logos centered at the neck area were great and didn't really need a change IMO.I agree. They suck now. The word mark looks way too small too. New York Mets & New York Jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSox44 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Just another example of how you shouldn't fix things if they aren't broken. The pullovers of the last few seasons with the cap logos centered at the neck area were great and didn't really need a change IMO.Those were truly fantastic. These certainly are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benpc21 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I agree on the downgrade. Not to mention these new ones feature screen printed graphics where the old ones were stitched...I do however like that they had hand warmer pockets in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 The ones from last year were better. Massive downgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 A bit off-topic, but here the Blue Jays are using the "bird in front of ball" logo, as opposed to the sans ball alternate. I'm curious why they can do it here but not on their caps. I'm aware of the rule about logos can't have balls in them, but aren't these pullovers technically being worn on-field occasionally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 I don't think so. Jerseys have to be worn under dugout jackets. I think if a player or coach wanted to wear these fleeces, they'd have to put a jersey under it, much more likely with the word marked long sleeve version than the logoed short sleeves. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 That would be a perfectly fine raglan in not for the side panels. Don't apparel designers realize that there's a whole market of people who would buy this stuff if they left out all the superfluous details? I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lahaye7 Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 probably made ugly on purpose so players will not wear them on the bench during games I am sore,wounded, but not slainI will lay down and bleed a whileAnd then rise up to fight again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.