FlyersHockey1967 Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 I'm like Speedy. When the Preds first came out with their sabertooth logo and uniforms, I thought they looked pretty good. I still think the logo isn't bad, but the uniforms belong in a roller hockey league (and I'm saying this after a year of roller hockey!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 Hello? Have you ever seen the Chicago Blackhawks logo? There's 3 or 4 colours on their logo that aren't in their scheme.Yes, but do they designate any of those colors as a primary? Do they have a green alternate sweater, or a blue one? The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie003 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 someone move this team to Kansas City or Ontario please. One of the best talented teams and lack of support. Hockey in the heehaw states wont work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChefShark Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 ^^ this was not necessary. dont be a prick.and I cant understand the hate for the Pred's primary package. The alt. sucks true but they have a great dark jersey whereas the white one could be great with some minor modifications. US state flag concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie003 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 ^^ this was not necessary. dont be a prick.and I cant understand the hate for the Pred's primary package. The alt. sucks true but they have a great dark jersey whereas the white one could be great with some minor modifications.My bad I was just joking, but what I did say is true, Hockey in that area is not successful and they should move the team where it can flourish. even Seattle is a better bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChefShark Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 no its not true, and its not even relevant to the topic.what does the team's support have to do with thier graphic identity? US state flag concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 ^^ this was not necessary. dont be a prick.and I cant understand the hate for the Pred's primary package. The alt. sucks true but they have a great dark jersey whereas the white one could be great with some minor modifications.My bad I was just joking, but what I did say is true, Hockey in that area is not successful and they should move the team where it can flourish. even Seattle is a better bet.Give it time...the team hasn't been successful until recently, and it takes time to build up a fanbase. On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 no its not truebut it is, so far... we can pretend it's been a success, but it hasn't.... stats don't lie: newish arena, amazing team, 25th in the league in attendance.things could/should change after this season thoughbuuuuuuuuuuut, back on topic --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net  "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 no its not truebut it is, so far... we can pretend it's been a success, but it hasn't.... stats don't lie: newish arena, amazing team, 25th in the league in attendance.things could/should change after this season thoughbuuuuuuuuuuut, back on topic But the Devils' attendance woes are entirely inconsequential ....(I know, I know, back on topic). On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartacat_12 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Hello? Have you ever seen the Chicago Blackhawks logo? There's 3 or 4 colours on their logo that aren't in their scheme.Yes, but do they designate any of those colors as a primary? Do they have a green alternate sweater, or a blue one?No they don't. I never said that they do. The point that I was trying to make is that all of the colours in your logo don't have to be part of your actual colour scheme. I was using Chicago as an example of a team that has been doing this for quite some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 no its not truebut it is, so far... we can pretend it's been a success, but it hasn't.... stats don't lie: newish arena, amazing team, 25th in the league in attendance.things could/should change after this season thoughbuuuuuuuuuuut, back on topic But the Devils' attendance woes are entirely inconsequential ....(I know, I know, back on topic).Not sure what the Devils have to do with this --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net  "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Hello? Have you ever seen the Chicago Blackhawks logo? There's 3 or 4 colours on their logo that aren't in their scheme.Yes, but do they designate any of those colors as a primary? Do they have a green alternate sweater, or a blue one?No they don't. I never said that they do. The point that I was trying to make is that all of the colours in your logo don't have to be part of your actual colour scheme. I was using Chicago as an example of a team that has been doing this for quite some time.His complaint was that they consider yellow a primary identity color, even though it is barely part of the primary logo. That is very different from the Blackhawks, who have many additional colors in their logo that are not considered "identity colors." That's why I don't think your example really fits. The Blackhawks are a team which does exactly the opposite of the Preds.My bad I was just joking, but what I did say is true, Hockey in that area is not successfulThe relevant point, I think, is that the originator of this thread specifically asked us not to start that discussion in his first post.The least we could do is honor his wishes in this matter. It's common courtesy. If you would like to talk about the Preds' attendance, you are welcome to start your own thread in the appropriate forum. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letterform Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 It's obvious that this isn't an official logo. This belongs in the concepts section. DEATH TO REEBOK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Why don't they create a cool classic looking wordmark instead of dumping a skull or robot panther on the front? Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 The least we could do is honor his wishes in this matter. It's common courtesy. If you would like to talk about the Preds' attendance, you are welcome to start your own thread in the appropriate forum.Agreed, my apologies for continuing it --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net  "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedsunited Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 I like their sweaters, and I agree that the metallic material on the sweaters is good...one thing that has always bothered me about the Preds is the fact that the sabertooth that is on their sweater, upon looking, is blue-gray, orange, navy, silver...almost like a Denver Broncos 2.0 scheme.BUT....they put a yellow stroke around it on the dark sweater...and call their colors silver, navy, and yellow?I understand their old alt, with the Gaylord Entertainment Center Logo on the shoulders, had yellow in them...but now, to me, the logo itself clashes with the jerseys.Hello? Have you ever seen the Chicago Blackhawks logo? There's 3 or 4 colours on their logo that aren't in their scheme.Anyway, I happen to love the Preds 3rds. I think that they should wear them on the road and make a blue version to wear at home. But those are just my 2 rusty pennies.Yeah, but the Hawks' sweater WORKS. Works in every way imaginable. The Preds? Not even in the same league as that classic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeytonManningRocks Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Hmmm.....it's an okay logo, I guess. Kinda has a little Nashville Kats feel to it for some reason.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oz615 Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 It's obvious that this isn't an official logo. This belongs in the concepts section.http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar...RTS11/702270376 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebod39 Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Wow,it's hard to believe that it has been almost 10 years.But guys please none of this relocation or Kansas City or "it will be their last" type stuff in this thread,thanksSloppy and amateurish. It's a sin for a professional team to have paid for poor quality work like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedsunited Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Hmmm.....it's an okay logo, I guess. Kinda has a little Nashville Kats feel to it for some reason....If that's not damning with faint praise, I don't know what is. A "Nashville Kats" feel? Ouch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.