Jump to content

packerfan21396

Members
  • Posts

    718
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Title
    Banging on the Drum All Day
  • Location
    WFB/MKE
  • Interests
    All things 'Scansin
  • Favorite Teams
    Packers, Brewers, Bucks, Badgers, Admirals

Recent Profile Visitors

9,729 profile views

packerfan21396's Achievements

767

Reputation

  1. Looks like the score bug font is based on Hyperspace Race Condensed Heavy (tweaks to 2 and 7, created a monospace 1 as well for the time and quarter). Also, for other uses, it looks like they use members of the Media Sans family (but a tad thicker, and tweaks to various letters and numbers).
  2. Gonna go through my process in case you prefer what I came up with and if you wanted to try yourself for the next logo creation: 1. Perspective warp as above, and then overlayed over the existing logo: 2. Add guides to determine the size of the circle of text, and create the inner circle with paths: 3. Generate text along path (for me, I used a GIMP plug-in, but there are plenty other plug-ins in other programs that produce the same thing): 4. Add text and raise the banners to be more centered between the text:
  3. Beat me to it, I would just make the New and Jersey closer together, like in the source that I perspective warped: Also, its possible that the font you're actually looking for is Decotura.
  4. First off, congratulations on the completion of a top tier project; truly some fantastic work. Recreating all the renewal stickers is also a top tier detail that adds a lot to the authenticity. While the Wisconsin highway shape is unique, the current shape is a compromise so that numbers can fit well; originally, the Wisconsin highway marker was just a downward pointing triangle: Could be a bit cleaner to make the divider the downward pointing triangle, plus then it could look like some minimalist cheese and who doesn't love a bit more cheese?
  5. I feel like of all the 414 iterations, the serif one in number 4 feels the most connected, I'd probably make the 1 skinnier though, it's a bit strong to me. As for CC monogram, how would a Chanel type monogram look like to mimic the 414?
  6. The typographical term for that is called overshoot, and it's meant to compensate for the inaccuracies of how our brains see things. In Hoefler&Co's blog post about their font, Ideal Sans, they described it well saying, "Typefaces are born from the struggle between rules and results. Squeezing a square about 1% helps it look more like a square; to appear the same height as a square, a circle must be measurably taller. The two strokes in an X aren’t the same thickness, nor are their parallel edges actually parallel; the vertical stems of a lowercase alphabet are thinner than those of its capitals; the ascender on a d isn’t the same length as the descender on a p, and so on. For the rational mind, type design can be a maddening game of drawing things differently in order to make them appear the same."
  7. I think you might be onto something on the top one, but I think to fit an H and T into a monogram nicely, you might want to make a tall skinny T and a short wide H that intersect in the middle.
  8. Packers' yokes are finally the proper size and shape making for a fantastic concept, my only suggestion would be to make the collar green like the yoke. Also, the current block is definitely fitting, but I'm yearning for the day the Packers make a retro number font a la Bears throwbacks; could even go the 1939 Packers route with box top 1's and limited serifs.
  9. Yearbook Solid with a pointier M
  10. This graphic uses College Condensed (all caps), but I doubt this is what the actual 2005 movie uniforms used.
  11. Been getting the errors that have been mentioned, just seems like the CSS isn't working at all.
  12. Looks like Rockwell Bold with a de-serifed C.
  13. Agency FB Black is similar as well.
  14. It does, but unfortunately, I feel like this is a hand-drawn Clarendon to hug the Just Do It banner. 76ers' explanation of the jersey say the numbers are based off the 76-77 team, which wore these numbers instead: (Dr. J has a replacement 6 here) Which has been reproduced well for the 2016 MLB All Star Game batting practice jerseys, but not on this Mixtape jersey. If you want historical accuracy, I'd use these: Otherwise, the modern reproduction that looks similarly wonky as the Mixtape numbers is usually called Athletic Gothic:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.