Sean84106 Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 Hm..I don't like it.http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,600134978,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 Rumors had been going that it might be the Warriors. The NIFL team was named that and from what Ive heard, it's the same ownership. Athletic Director: KTU Blue Grassers Football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean84106 Posted May 19, 2005 Author Share Posted May 19, 2005 Except the Washington AFL group has the rights to the name...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omnivore Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 I kinda like the name. The moniker will be only half as important as what the logo looks like. NCFA-FCS/CBB: Minnesota A&M | RANZBA (OOTP): Auckland Warriors | USA: Front Range United | IFA: Toverit Helsinki | FOBL: Kentucky Juggernaut Minnesota A&M 2012 National Champions 2013 National Finalist, 2014 National Semi-finals 2012, 2013, 2014 Big 4 Conference Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 "Utah Blaze" reeks of WNBA.You had to know Salt Lake errr Utah would pick another silly nickname with a "Z" in it. Jazz.Grizzlies.Starz.Blaze.Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puckcool22 Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 When teams play the Utah Blaze, their tough guy can say, "Stoner bashing time..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 Pathetic is the Omaha Beef. Had to see that one to believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Rich Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 A couple of years back, the AFL2 had a team in Baton Rouge, LA called the "Blaze". Their logo had elements of that city's British, French and Spanish heritage:They didn't last too long-- a year or two at the most. I guess they went out in a "Blaze" of Glory....ba-dum-dumthank, you ladies and gents, you've been a dynamite audience...... It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean84106 Posted May 19, 2005 Author Share Posted May 19, 2005 While I agree that Utah got a bit insane with the 'Z' thing, some of them were legit however.The Utah Grizzlies were the former DENVER Grizzlies and moved to Salt Lake when the Avs moved to Denver. The owner decided to keep the name because it fit in with the area. The Utah Starzz was a lame attempt at playing homage to one of the greatest ABA teams ever, the Utah Stars. There were the Salt Lake Buzz, who were created by the owner Joe BUZAS. They were named after him and the fact Utah is known as the Beehive State. So that didn't look oddly out of place.During the 90s however there was a rash of double z'd teams. Utah Catzz Utah Freezz Utah Pioneerzz Utah Salt RatzzUtah BumfluffzzI'm not so sure however you can say "Blaze" fits in with that double-ending 'z' thing because firstly it's not two Zs and it doesn't end in Zs. I however don't think this name has anything to do with Salt Lake City...so not sure why they picked it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian in Boston Posted May 19, 2005 Share Posted May 19, 2005 Utah is known as the Beehive State. Which is why I would have named Salt Lake City's new Arena Football League franchise either the Utah Swarm or Utah Sting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 Utah is known as the Beehive State. Which is why I would have named Salt Lake City's new Arena Football League franchise either the Utah Swarm or Utah Sting. swarm was tghe name of a former arena football2 (af2) team in Cincy and Sting was a former name of a now defunct Vegas team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stampman Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 So what if it has the "Z" thing--they should have called it something that oozes Utah--The Utah Jazz!Or adapt this logo--they could have it for free! Comic Sans walks into a bar, and the bartender says, "Sorry, we don't serve your type here." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilbert Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 Pathetic is the Omaha Beef. Had to see that one to believe it. This one beats the Beef, the ABAs new Charlotte team the Charlotte Krunk! Signature intentionally left blank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 This one beats the Beef, the ABAs new Charlotte team the Charlotte Krunk! YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAUHHH!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nutcase Posted May 22, 2005 Share Posted May 22, 2005 God, I can't wait to see what the ABA can do with that name! Author of B2S2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted May 22, 2005 Share Posted May 22, 2005 This one beats the Beef, the ABAs new Charlotte team the Charlotte Krunk! YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAUHHH!! OOOOHKAAAAAAAAAYYY!!but comeon now, they misspelled it, it aint Krunk, it's Crunk A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
officeglenn Posted May 22, 2005 Share Posted May 22, 2005 This one beats the Beef, the ABAs new Charlotte team the Charlotte Krunk! YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAUHHH!! OOOOHKAAAAAAAAAYYY!!but comeon now, they misspelled it, it aint Krunk, it's Crunk The Krunk? WHHHAAAT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralW91 Posted May 22, 2005 Share Posted May 22, 2005 This one beats the Beef, the ABAs new Charlotte team the Charlotte Krunk! YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAUHHH!! OOOOHKAAAAAAAAAYYY!!but comeon now, they misspelled it, it aint Krunk, it's Crunk Isn't "crunk" trademarked or something? Still this name is crap. www.ABAsite.tk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilbert Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 This one beats the Beef, the ABAs new Charlotte team the Charlotte Krunk! YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAUHHH!! OOOOHKAAAAAAAAAYYY!!but comeon now, they misspelled it, it aint Krunk, it's Crunk Isn't "crunk" trademarked or something? Still this name is crap. yep thats why it was changed to Krunk Signature intentionally left blank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 Except the Washington AFL group has the rights to the name...... No, they don't. When the franchise was awarded Snyder announced he intended to use the name "Warriors", but there's no agreement with the league prohibiting some other club from using it if they beat him to fielding a team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.