VikingsNotMinnesota Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 So Maryland just hired Mike Locksley to coach their football team. This is the same guy who went 2-26 at New Mexico, which was his only stint as a head coach. Does Maryland just hate their football program that much?Isn't he just an interim coach promoted from offensive coordinator?I was under the assumption he was full time, that's great news if he isn't. Even then, he'd be the last guy I would trust with my football team.He's the interim.He's also probably one of the best recruiters in the country when it comes to DC/Northern Virginia, so that's one mark in his favor.Muschamp was a great recuiter too and we all know how that turned out.Gene Chizik was 5-16 at Iowa State.Auburn hired him away from ISU and they won the national championship.He won it when they had cam newton and gus malzahn, then crapped the bed after they left and got promptly fired. I doubt gene had much to do with that championship at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkJourney Posted October 23, 2015 Author Share Posted October 23, 2015 Cal will probably finish 6-6 or at best 7-5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 So assuming Notre Dame beats Temple next Saturday night, I would imagine that Temple will drop in the rankings. But why? Isn't a 11 ranked team supposed to beat a 22 ranked team? If that 22 ranked team plays horribly, and a team ranked below them plays great, then OK I kinda get it, but I don't understand why teams almost always drop after losing to higher-ranked teams. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS729 Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 So assuming Notre Dame beats Temple next Saturday night, I would imagine that Temple will drop in the rankings.But why? Isn't a 11 ranked team supposed to beat a 22 ranked team? If that 22 ranked team plays horribly, and a team ranked below them plays great, then OK I kinda get it, but I don't understand why teams almost always drop after losing to higher-ranked teams.Because right now Temple's claim to fame is the fact that they're unbeaten. If they lose? Then they're a 1-loss mid-major who's best win is against either Penn State or East Carolina. I'll let you be the judge or whether that is a Top 25 team or not. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzcut Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 A JUCO game ended in a brawl. And they didn't even get to complete a half of play.http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13951460/mississippi-junior-college-football-game-ends-fight-breaks-outSorry, no youtube videos yet. The CCSLC's resident Geelong Cats fan. Viva La Vida or Death And All His Friends. Sounds like something from a Rocky & Bullwinkle story arc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikingsNotMinnesota Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 So assuming Notre Dame beats Temple next Saturday night, I would imagine that Temple will drop in the rankings.But why? Isn't a 11 ranked team supposed to beat a 22 ranked team? If that 22 ranked team plays horribly, and a team ranked below them plays great, then OK I kinda get it, but I don't understand why teams almost always drop after losing to higher-ranked teams.Becuase Temple hasn't beaten anyone other than Penn State. If they finish 11-1 they probably still get a spot in the top 25, but losing to notre dame, unless it's an extremely close game that goes right down to the wire, probably gets them out of the rankings, and deservedly so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 So assuming Notre Dame beats Temple next Saturday night, I would imagine that Temple will drop in the rankings.But why? Isn't a 11 ranked team supposed to beat a 22 ranked team? If that 22 ranked team plays horribly, and a team ranked below them plays great, then OK I kinda get it, but I don't understand why teams almost always drop after losing to higher-ranked teams.The only rankings which matter for Temple (and every other team) do not start until November 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Miami :censored:ting the bed on national TV. I'm totally shocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Nobody does Homecoming better than Oklahoma State.http://m.newson6.com/story.aspx?story=30340500&catId=112042 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Seems like Baylor could score 100 points every game. Why aren't they ranked #1? 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burkell007 Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Seems like Baylor could score 100 points every game. Why aren't they ranked #1?Cause they have played nobody that's really good. It's easy to score 100 against cupcakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBolt3 Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Miami deserves better than this.(And you know, Clemson is pretty good but keep it on the down low.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Miami deserves better than this.(And you know, Clemson is pretty good but keep it on the down low.)You get what you pay for.And The U is notoriously stingy regarding salaries for coaches.Here we go: http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/13960128/warren-sapp-other-ex-miami-hurricanes-rip-al-golden-game-vs-clemson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seadragon76 Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Miami deserves better than this.(And you know, Clemson is pretty good but keep it on the down low.)You know, that Clemson team is pretty good... oh, wait. This is jinxing them, isn't it? Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikingsNotMinnesota Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 You think Golden just might be Kiffined after this? Just maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBolt3 Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Miami deserves better than this.(And you know, Clemson is pretty good but keep it on the down low.) You know, that Clemson team is pretty good...SHHHHHH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Seems like Baylor could score 100 points every game. Why aren't they ranked #1?Every year in CFB there's some offensive juggernaut that seems unstoppable, and everybody thinks they've reinvented the game. Last year it was the Ducks. And every year, that team gets to the bowl season, sometimes even the championship. And that's when a team that isn't trying to reinvent football... just trying to play it the way its always been played but play it that way really really well, shuts that offensive juggernaut down. Don't be surprised when it happens again. Â http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Damn, Clemson! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted October 24, 2015 Share Posted October 24, 2015 Per Barry Jackson (Miami Herald):Most lopsided loss in UM history ends at 58-0. Clemson 33 first downs, UM 6. Clemson 567 yards, UM 146 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.