oldschoolvikings Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 minute ago, BadSeed84 said: The Doplhins should be thinking to do the same thing as the Jets. And... 17 3 3 Quote http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowld Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Guessing the Jags will bring back the old helmet to pair with throwback jersey. Likely a better choice than some Teal alternate 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 49 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said: These are some damn good uniforms for the Jets. Even the black set. Could definitely do without the black helmet, but it is what it is. You forgot to include green over white, which will hopefully be worn far more than mono-green. But what a fantastic look. Bold logo, traditional striping, and they’re actually embracing the green. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolingian Steamroller Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 3 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said: 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSeaHeath Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Just now, Carolingian Steamroller said: Holy :censored: that's a good football uniform. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Just now, bowld said: Guessing the Jags will bring back the old helmet to pair with throwback jersey. Likely a better choice than some Teal alternate Since the old helmet was black, they can do both. Hell, starting in 2025, the can have a black, teal, AND a white helmet. 1 Quote http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Star Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, DCarp1231 said: 1978-1989 arrives once again with the Jets. YAY!!! I love it. I hope to god they do not make green pants for that set. But geez almighty, they look unbeatable. Next to the 2020 Chargers, they have the best set ever! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 minute ago, oldschoolvikings said: And... … but with a white facemask 11 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Star Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 minutes ago, MCM0313 said: You forgot to include green over white, which will hopefully be worn far more than mono-green. But what a fantastic look. Bold logo, traditional striping, and they’re actually embracing the green. :censored:, nevermind! They do have green pants with the set! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOOVER Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 24 minutes ago, Carolingian Steamroller said: Am I daft, or do those pants have a sheen to them? They do! What’s old is new! It works even better with the seemingly traditional satin twill used for the numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Impaler Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 16 minutes ago, Carolingian Steamroller said: These guys can't even tuck in the damn undershirt on a friggin uniform reveal photoshoot, smdh. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 13 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: And... I'd never suggest these uniforms aren't fantastic -- they are. But I think a move like this only works if the uniforms it would be replacing are terrible. I can't say that about the current Vikings look. I don't care for the current facemask color, but that's about the only issue I have with them. They're otherwise a perfect modernization of a classic look. 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowld Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Just now, gosioux76 said: I'd never suggest these uniforms aren't fantastic -- they are. But I think a move like this only works if the uniforms it would be replacing are terrible. I can't say that about the current Vikings look. I don't care for the current facemask color, but that's about the only issue I have with them. They're otherwise a perfect modernization of a classic look. Not going to mention the numbers? I can't stand how they look 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfraser85 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 minutes ago, The Impaler said: These guys can't even tuck in the damn undershirt on a friggin uniform reveal photoshoot, smdh. I saw something too. None of the players were wearing white socks. I'm sure that will change in the fall, but it's interesting to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Well, the Jets did exactly what they should have done in 2018! It’s nice to see the throwback be promoted (and for Champion Block to return). Now this picture of Aaron Rodgers in the ‘18-‘23 set really is a wrong uniform (since he wore the throwback in his only game). 16 Quote MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrayJ12 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Sack Exchange-era Jets is a visual identity I love, and I'm glad it's getting a second life, but why do they still have black? Is BFBS making an unfortunate comeback as well? I know people want the Namath-era jerseys back as an alt, but I'd love for them to bring back the old Titans of New York scheme for a least a game. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Just now, gosioux76 said: I'd never suggest these uniforms aren't fantastic -- they are. But I think a move like this only works if the uniforms it would be replacing are terrible. I can't say that about the current Vikings look. I don't care for the current facemask color, but that's about the only issue I have with them. They're otherwise a perfect modernization of a classic look. I disagree. You would only replace a uniform if it's terrible? That seems like a weird stance. Obviously terrible is terrible, and those uniforms need to be burned, but if a team can go from good (current Vikings) to great (throwback Vikings) as well as bringing back an iconic look from when the team was annually one of the best teams in the league (just obviously not the best team in any of their 4 Super bowls ) then you do it IMO. 5 Quote http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharos04 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Jets look really good. They should never have to change again. I even don’t mind the black as there’s a good amount of green mixed in. solid upgrade all around 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 5 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: I disagree. You would only replace a uniform if it's terrible? That seems like a weird stance. No, what I'm saying is making this hard turn back to an old-school throwback as a full-time uniform is usually done as a course correction away from something justifiably terrible. It's like admitting you made a mistake and you had it good before. The Vikings uniforms -- in what appears to be a widely shared view, yourself excluded -- aren't anywhere near the level where a course correction would be necessary. In fact, I'd argue the current uniforms were that course correction from the abhorrent 2006-2012 uniforms, and they nailed it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 13 minutes ago, rfraser85 said: I saw something too. None of the players were wearing white socks. I'm sure that will change in the fall, but it's interesting to see. I hope white socks are kept to an absolute minimum. I don’t think they will mind wearing green socks with the Legacy White - they did last year and had really good games compared to the rest of the season. What was it - beat the defending divisional champs despite losing their QB, beat the defending NFC champs, came very close against the defending Super Bowl champs? And in their other games they sucked. I hope that infuses the green-white-white-green with a winning feel. 13 minutes ago, GrayJ12 said: Sack Exchange-era Jets is a visual identity I love, and I'm glad it's getting a second life, but why do they still have black? Is BFBS making an unfortunate comeback as well? I know people want the Namath-era jerseys back as an alt, but I'd love for them to bring back the old Titans of New York scheme for a least a game. I don’t get the love for the Titans of New York look. I’ve always found those uniforms ugly. A proper Namath-era throwback would give this team all it needs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.