Brave-Bird 08 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 minutes ago, HOOVER said: Too many cooks in the kitchen. Right? 30+ focus groups is why the team is officially calling one of its uniforms a "tough" uniform like lmao have some self respect, Texans 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruttep Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, CaliforniaGlowin said: Bold and tough and rep the city. I'm excited! If those words lead to a good design, it would be the first time. I can't wait for all-navy with an unreadable number font. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkKidCatholic Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 What's wrong with these? Lighter green was all they needed. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekbkr Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 45 minutes ago, Sodboy13 said: "This bold reinvention of a classic logo reflects the consistent organizational direction over the last half-century, and our commitment to it in the future." "Reflects" is right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pa02 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 8 hours ago, DrunkKidCatholic said: What's wrong with these? Lighter green was all they needed. 1. The logo had too much going on from the NY to the Jets, to the football and the oval. Way too busy. 2. We have enough white helmets. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PERRIN Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 24 minutes ago, DrunkKidCatholic said: What's wrong with these? Lighter green was all they needed. Could just be my bias as a Pats fan but I’ve never cared for the Jets’ classic massive shoulder stripe look. Something about having that much white space on a home jersey feels wrong to me, but it looks fine on the away set. The logo that comes with that set is hot garbage, the shade of green is hopelessly drab, and the white helmet feels far more bland than a green one. I don’t think the Sack Change set is perfect, but it works a lot better as a uniform set in my book, even if the Jets weren’t as successful in it. I’m fine with moving to them full time so long as monochrome is avoided. The updated logo suite is absolutely perfect, the exact modernization of a classic logo that the Jets desperately need. Gets an A+ in that department. 3 1 Quote Perrin Grubb | Aspiring Designer | NAFA Project ~ NFL Redesigns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Jets new look is pretty good. For whatever complaints there may be about them, they definitely look better now than they have since at least the early Reebok days (when everything still fit together properly on the original throwbacks and the color didn’t look like pea soup). I barely think about the Jets anyway. I can live with these. 2 Quote On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pa02 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, CaliforniaGlowin said: Bold and tough and rep the city. I'm excited! Gold? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 I love the neo-sack exchange set, but what a missed opportunity to build off these instead of the now previous set. 2 2 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 hours ago, Sodboy13 said: You all like the Jets' new uniforms now. Come back to me after the sixth consecutive week of them wearing the black pants and black socks. The uniform tops out at "acceptable," the devotion to accuracy on the fonts is nice but the fonts themselves are nothing to write home about, the finish on the helmet seems way out of place on a straight retro look, and the alternate is more BFBS than ever now that the black trim has been stripped out of the primaries. The Keyshawn/Kotite era is the best the Jets have ever dressed, but everything outside of the aesthetics is why we'll never see that revived. I am under the impression that they aren’t allowed to wear the black pants and socks except with the rest of that alternate set. Even if I’m wrong, I think they stick to classic combos at least 2/3 of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerslionspistonshabs Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 I'm anxiously/nervously awaiting the Lions reveal. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 53 minutes ago, HOOVER said: Too many cooks in the kitchen. Well, it takes a lot to make a stew. 1 Quote On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 26 minutes ago, PERRIN said: Could just be my bias as a Pats fan but I’ve never cared for the Jets’ classic massive shoulder stripe look. Something about having that much white space on a home jersey feels wrong to me, but it looks fine on the away set. The logo that comes with that set is hot garbage, the shade of green is hopelessly drab, and the white helmet feels far more bland than a green one. I don’t think the Sack Change set is perfect, but it works a lot better as a uniform set in my book, even if the Jets weren’t as successful in it. I’m fine with moving to them full time so long as monochrome is avoided. The updated logo suite is absolutely perfect, the exact modernization of a classic logo that the Jets desperately need. Gets an A+ in that department. The neo-Namaths looked fantastic in 1998, when they were first brought back. In 2002 (I think, @TruColor?) they darkened and muddied their shade of green, and the set was never the same. It’s a shame because the green pants that they introduced after the color change would’ve looked great before. Then Nike came along and infamously had a lot of trouble matching shades of green, with the Eagles unable to wear their standard home set for a half-season, and the Jets (probably even worse) somehow sporting multiple shades of muddy dark green on the same jersey. With the color element ruined (and that 1998 forest green had been fantastic!), it became a lot easier to notice the drawbacks to that set: logo that was somehow boring, unrepresentative of the team name, and too busy all at once; generic uniform design that basically aped that of the Colts; and one of seemingly a billion sets with white lids (one of three in their own division). Fact is, all the Jets’ uniform sets have been too plain for my liking, save the 2019-23 set, which was ruined by a lack of consistency across uniform elements, and a design that tried to do too much, and the team constantly wearing combos that weren’t designed to be worn together. If you’re gonna have plain threads, you need a distinctive logo and color scheme. These new-old uniforms are simple but designed and executed better, and the new-old logo is arguably one of the most distinctive in NFL history. Fact is, the Jets didn’t NEED to change in 1998. Bill Parcells took over in 1997 and said the Namath-era set was what a football team should look like (I suspect he was salty that he hadn’t gotten to coach the white-lidded Patriots), and the organization modernized that set to suit his liking. They looked fine from 1990-97, but that look was made stale by the numerous bad moments that accompanied it: losing in Week 18 to miss the playoffs in 1993; utterly collapsing down the stretch in 1994 (a collapse precipitated by Marino’s fake spike); and the embarrassment of having the bottom fall out under Kotite in 1995-96. Something had to change and Parcells had an idea, so they took it and ran with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 4 minutes ago, Sodboy13 said: Well, it takes a lot to make a stew. When it comes to me and you… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gothedistance Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, Silver_Star said: The 2018 set sucks so badly. They were not as great as anyone wanted them to be like. Actually, it came out in 2019. And I liked the previous set. I thought it was underrated. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 minute ago, gothedistance said: Actually, it came out in 2019. And I liked the previous set. I thought it was underrated. It had promise but was poorly executed. Kind of like the Falcons’ current set. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 8 minutes ago, DrunkKidCatholic said: What's wrong with these? Lighter green was all they needed. While these are a little better than the versions in the Nike-cut jerseys, this still looks like a 1960s-era uniform squeezed into a modern template. It's fixable, but it still doesn't look quite right. The biggest issue is that inner green stripe, which was originally a hoop that continued under the armpit. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 7 hours ago, DCarp1231 said: Predicted, yet solid. Add some double-striped socks in both green and white to match the sleeves...and then never touch these again, NYJ. Like, ever. These are their forever sets...keep them that way. 7 hours ago, Eszcz21 said: Jaguars' throwback announcement. And the timer has officially been set at the Jaguars reverting back to [a slightly cleaned-up version of] that logo—and the cat head version of it. I give it four years, max. The Jets just proved that it's possible. Shoot, the Jags can bring back the 98-'08 numbers while they're at it. Again, the Jets just proved that it's possible. (Who had "Jets being trendsetters" on their bingo card in 2024?) 4 hours ago, MrAstrodome said: Texans Redesign mini-movie. 3 hours ago, DCarp1231 said: Texans uniform descriptions Riiight...lol, Houston. Three of those are gonna be okay...that fourth one, probably not so much. 4 Quote *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Survival79 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 hours ago, DCarp1231 said: It slightly bugs be that they couldn’t figure out how to face the jet forward on the left side of the helmet 10 Quote "If things have gone wrong, I'm talking to myself, and you've got a wet towel wrapped around your head." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SportsFan12 Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Anyone got a vector file of the new logo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.