WSU151 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Don't know if this has been posted yet, but I found this image of what appears to be the Bearcats' new jersey. I know that the logo, field, and probably helmet have been posted, but I hadn't seen this before. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAO Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 i like......no piping Behance Network || ianbakar.com || Dribbble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moser316 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Looks very sharp, especially with the new wordmark... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Very nice, though I hope the little circle R registered mark doesn't appear on the actual jerseys. That really makes it look like a cheap retail replica. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Nice upgrade. I don't know many football teams that use Friz Quadrata for numbers, but it matches the wordmark and will stand out more against the other generic NCAA gothic number templates. Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsfan39 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 pretty sweet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yh Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Not crazy about the drop shadow (which I feel only works well with block numbers) but aside from that slight nitpick, I like this jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilbert Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 I like it but still hate the $35,000 italicised c paw. no I will not get over it. The old one was just fine Signature intentionally left blank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 I like this look but I think they could've done more than this. It'll probably look like USC's when the actual jerseys roll out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMLSooner Posted July 20, 2005 Share Posted July 20, 2005 Those shoulders make me hungry for white cheddar cheese wedges! http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq200/wyopokes2/Sooners.gif http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq200/wyopokes2/Cowboys.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patsox Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 NIIICEE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 Put that together with their black helmet and some black pants, and you got yourself a winner in my book.Upgrade.--------------------Post #1600 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtrich11 Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 I like it too. Friz Quadrata is an underrated font.My nitpick is the white shoulders. I'd like to have seen a bit of red on the outer edges, or just make the whole wedge red. I like to see a lot of red and black together. Perhaps it's a personal preference. Regardless, it ain't bad. Dilbert- whenever I read your posts I have to use the voice of Barney. It just pops in my head. Now if you used a picture of the Professor from Gilligan's Island, then you'll really have authority. cafepress.com/artbyrichards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyBrownie13 Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 pretty sweet look, if you ask me. There you go Nike, there's a nice, modern, original jersey WITHOUT piping! Bravo when you're replacing an old Carr, you need more than Les Miles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambruiser Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 i like it overall- but I guess I am not a fan on lettering on the front of jerseys. Only a few teams can get away with it in my opinion- Oklahoma and Texas immediately spring to mind. But other than that and the previous comment about the drop shadow on the numbers these should look very nice indeed Millican StudiosMillican Studios Blog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted July 22, 2005 Share Posted July 22, 2005 I like it but still hate the $35,000 italicised c paw. no I will not get over it. The old one was just fine Did you check out the Flash teaser advertising the new C-Paw? It had this crazy zoom pan of the old C-Paw, and you could see that the old toe prints were the most terribly drawn graphic elements you may ever hope to see, almost like pseudo-ellipse polygons. The old one was not fine, but they didn't need to spend 35 large on a new one when they could have just cleaned up the old one. With that said, though, I really like the new logo. It looks much less like a factory installed font that comes with your computer and more like a nice custom-esque job. Much more cohesive and attractive. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.