jgsmith725 Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 If the sonics move to OKC , I thought I would just come up with a simple concept of the court. I like the two tone stain, so I would keep that but make the logo in center court a little bit smaller. Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 If the sonics move to OKC , I thought I would just come up with a simple concept of the court. I like the two tone stain, so I would keep that but make the logo in center court a little bit smaller. Enjoy!Just curious, but why would a team in OKC keep a generic "S" logo at midcourt? It just doesn't make sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgsmith725 Posted April 14, 2008 Author Share Posted April 14, 2008 If the sonics move to OKC , I thought I would just come up with a simple concept of the court. I like the two tone stain, so I would keep that but make the logo in center court a little bit smaller. Enjoy!Just curious, but why would a team in OKC keep a generic "S" logo at midcourt? It just doesn't make senseNot to sound like a smarta$$ but maybe b/c that is what there mascot name is and what they have now in seattle. S = Sonics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarred Revolver Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 haha, playoffs?!?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 I love court concepts, not feeling this though.First, the Ford logo shouldn't be above Ford Center. Just the Stadium logo is allowed, not the corporate sponsor for which its named. (However, I'd Like to see Ford Center written out in the Ford script, that might look nice.Secondly, the Two tone is ok (the Sonics were the first of the new-run two toners, so they can keep it) but idk about the tow-tone within two-tone. The top half of the free throw circle doesn't need to be dark. Also, color in the middle of the S with white, not nothing. And parquet is too much, especially with two tone wood as well. Pick one or the other. (Plus, green and parquet is taken I believe)Give the out of bounds some color, it looks High School-ish without it. Take the Red out of the hash marks along the key.Back to the drawing board I say with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy! Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 If the sonics move to OKC , I thought I would just come up with a simple concept of the court. I like the two tone stain, so I would keep that but make the logo in center court a little bit smaller. Enjoy!Just curious, but why would a team in OKC keep a generic "S" logo at midcourt? It just doesn't make senseNot to sound like a smarta$$ but maybe b/c that is what there mascot name is and what they have now in seattle. S = SonicsOne could also argue that it's "S" for Seattle. If you're gonna move a team to another city, I'd do everything I could to brand it OKC and not Seattle. "I secretly hope people like that hydroplane into a wall." - Dennis "Big Sexy" Ittner POTD - 7/3/14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacker12 Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 From what I have been hearing, Bennett is going to change the team name if they do move to Seattle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrySmalls Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Does the small primary logos inside the arc say OK CITY SONICS? I agree with earlier posts that they'd try really hard to remove any traces of Seattle from the Oklahoma City franchise. Quite honestly, I'm not buying this concept at all -- even the playoffs bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwtrailtrekker Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 haha, playoffs?!?!? you took the words right out of my mouth.jeez i hate the supes. every bit of love i had for them shifted to the nuckies last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
averyj Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 edit: nevermind You know, I rarely visit ccslsc anymore. I really should fix that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyandlux Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Is it true the owners filed for OKC Wranglers as the new name? I don't think they'll keep Sonics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Hey just thinking, if the Sonics move to OKC, it would help with the Mid-West division. Right now it very spaced out, from Minnesota to Utah up to Seattle. What I would do is move Portland to the Pacific, Phoenix to the South West (they should be anyway - Arizona is the definition of Southwest) So it would be:Pacific (Down the Coast):PortlandGolden StateSacramentoLA LakersLA ClippersSouth West (Along the Rio Grand):PhoenixHoustonDallasSan AntonioNew OrleansMidwest (Now much closer together):MinnesotaUtahDenverOklahoma CityMemphisIf New Orleans moves to Vegas, then just swap divisions with Memphis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGodfather Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 I like the concept, but laughing at the changing name with location.At least that makes sense, DEVIL RAYS?! Hahaha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
See Red Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 I love court concepts, not feeling this though.First, the Ford logo shouldn't be above Ford Center. Just the Stadium logo is allowed, not the corporate sponsor for which its named. (However, I'd Like to see Ford Center written out in the Ford script, that might look nice.Yeah, the Ford logo definetely wouldn't be allowed on the court... and for what it's worth, neither would the Ford script before "Center", even without the blue oval accompanying it, I think.I'll be very disappointed if they remain the Sonics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29texan Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 I love court concepts, not feeling this though.First, the Ford logo shouldn't be above Ford Center. Just the Stadium logo is allowed, not the corporate sponsor for which its named. (However, I'd Like to see Ford Center written out in the Ford script, that might look nice.Yeah, the Ford logo definetely wouldn't be allowed on the court... and for what it's worth, neither would the Ford script before "Center", even without the blue oval accompanying it, I think.I'll be very disappointed if they remain the Sonics.I've heard that the team would change the nickname if the move became offical. I've also heard that "Barons" is a front running name.Imagine.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartacat_12 Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Hey just thinking, if the Sonics move to OKC, it would help with the Mid-West division. Right now it very spaced out, from Minnesota to Utah up to Seattle. What I would do is move Portland to the Pacific, Phoenix to the South West (they should be anyway - Arizona is the definition of Southwest) So it would be:Pacific (Down the Coast):PortlandGolden StateSacramentoLA LakersLA ClippersSouth West (Along the Rio Grand):PhoenixHoustonDallasSan AntonioNew OrleansMidwest (Now much closer together):MinnesotaUtahDenverOklahoma CityMemphisIf New Orleans moves to Vegas, then just swap divisions with Memphis.I highly doubt that the NBA would want the South West to be that tough. They would probably rather have the talent spread throughout the conference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Hey just thinking, if the Sonics move to OKC, it would help with the Mid-West division. Right now it very spaced out, from Minnesota to Utah up to Seattle. What I would do is move Portland to the Pacific, Phoenix to the South West (they should be anyway - Arizona is the definition of Southwest) So it would be:Pacific (Down the Coast):PortlandGolden StateSacramentoLA LakersLA ClippersSouth West (Along the Rio Grand):PhoenixHoustonDallasSan AntonioNew OrleansMidwest (Now much closer together):MinnesotaUtahDenverOklahoma CityMemphisIf New Orleans moves to Vegas, then just swap divisions with Memphis.I highly doubt that the NBA would want the South West to be that tough. They would probably rather have the talent spread throughout the conference.Where the hell is the "STOP REEL LINE MINT" graphic when you need it? "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 Hey just thinking, if the Sonics move to OKC, it would help with the Mid-West division. Right now it very spaced out, from Minnesota to Utah up to Seattle. What I would do is move Portland to the Pacific, Phoenix to the South West (they should be anyway - Arizona is the definition of Southwest) So it would be:Pacific (Down the Coast):PortlandGolden StateSacramentoLA LakersLA ClippersSouth West (Along the Rio Grand):PhoenixHoustonDallasSan AntonioNew OrleansMidwest (Now much closer together):MinnesotaUtahDenverOklahoma CityMemphisIf New Orleans moves to Vegas, then just swap divisions with Memphis.I highly doubt that the NBA would want the South West to be that tough. They would probably rather have the talent spread throughout the conference.Where the hell is the "STOP REEL LINE MINT" graphic when you need it?Well, I think they'd have to realign because otherwise you'd have just portland in the midwest wayyy out by itself and minnesota wayy out by itself as well.And also, you can't take strength of teams into consideration when aligning divisions. Those change all the time, this is a long term plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.