STL FANATIC Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 I think people should realize that the team would be folding and then likely immediately be replaced with a new team.The NHL would not likely operate with 29 teams. Although, this late, I suppose if they really didn't want Ballsillie and he won the bidding, they might have to for one season. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh_cat_eyes Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I think that Jim would be able to outbid the NHL. His net worth is a couple billion dollars! Thats so funny though. The NHL has to bid against someone else just to have control over their OWN franchise lmao! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams80 Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I think that Jim would be able to outbid the NHL. His net worth is a couple billion dollars! Thats so funny though. The NHL has to bid against someone else just to have control over their OWN franchise lmao!They always have control. That's why they'd go through with folding it in the unlikely event the appeals case didn't go their way.Balsillie could throw every dollar he has into buying the team, and ultimately....all he has a worthless scrap of paper and a band of surly employees who have nobody to play against.. On 8/1/2010 at 4:01 PM, winters in buffalo said: You manage to balance agitation with just enough salient points to keep things interesting. Kind of a low-rent DG_Now. On 1/2/2011 at 9:07 PM, Sodboy13 said: Today, we are all otaku. "The city of Peoria was once the site of the largest distillery in the world and later became the site for mass production of penicillin. So it is safe to assume that present-day Peorians are descended from syphilitic boozehounds."-Stephen Colbert POTD: February 15, 2010, June 20, 2010 The Glorious Bloom State Penguins (NCFAF) 2014: 2-9, 2015: 7-5 (L Pineapple Bowl), 2016: 1-0 (NCFAB) 2014-15: 10-8, 2015-16: 14-5 (SMC Champs, L 1st Round February Frenzy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I think that Jim would be able to outbid the NHL. His net worth is a couple billion dollars! Thats so funny though. The NHL has to bid against someone else just to have control over their OWN franchise lmao!They always have control. That's why they'd go through with folding it in the unlikely event the appeals case didn't go their way.Balsillie could throw every dollar he has into buying the team, and ultimately....all he has a worthless scrap of paper and a band of surly employees who have nobody to play against..Remember, his bullied the city of Hamilton to cough up $120 million for renovations if they get a team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I think that Jim would be able to outbid the NHL. His net worth is a couple billion dollars! Thats so funny though. The NHL has to bid against someone else just to have control over their OWN franchise lmao!Didn't the NHL just gain $2.1 billion (or something like that) in revenue this past season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 So Reinsdorf was probably just serving as a stopgap to buy the NHL time. The excuse that the Make It Seven effort somehow undermined the sale sure does reek of a lame copout. Prospects for the Coyotes' continued existence in Phoenix look rather dismal at this point.I don't know about that. I think the NHL may outbid Jim Balsillie for the team and in turn sell the team to Reinsdorf to the tune of $148 million. The league would lose about $60-70 million, but they would get to keep Jim out of their old boy's club. This would explain why Reinsdorf backs out on the same day the NHL makes a bid. I think Gary Bettman just showed Jim Balsillie a thing or two about backroom dealings.There are numerous teams who can afford to drop two million dollars on sour grapes? Man.Who isn't to say that Reisendorf only dropped out of the bidding process, only to come back after the NHL buys the team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 The point was that they'd be selling to Reinsdorf for less than they paid at auction, thus distributing a $60-70 million loss among the teams, just out of spite. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 The point was that they'd be selling to Reinsdorf for less than they paid at auction, thus distributing a $60-70 million loss among the teams, just out of spite.What you call spite, the would refer to as the long-term good of the league. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 You know I have been on board before I know its illustrated in its own thread but the NHL needs to be saved from the clutches of Gary Bettman. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 I think that Jim would be able to outbid the NHL. His net worth is a couple billion dollars! Thats so funny though. The NHL has to bid against someone else just to have control over their OWN franchise lmao!Didn't the NHL just gain $2.1 billion (or something like that) in revenue this past season?If they did, then 54% of gross revenues go to the players. The other 46% deals with all the other costs associated to doing business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 Just from reading these threads, I'm starting to form the opinion that the NHL needs a Jim Balsille, or a Mark Cuban, or someone of that ilk.As am I. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 Why people assume Balsillie and Cuban are of the same ilk, I don't know.The NHL could use a Mark Cuban, but Jim Balsillie is not that guy. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 Why people assume Balsillie and Cuban are of the same ilk, I don't know.The NHL could use a Mark Cuban, but Jim Balsillie is not that guy.The NHL could use THE Mark Cuban. I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 Why people assume Balsillie and Cuban are of the same ilk, I don't know.The NHL could use a Mark Cuban, but Jim Balsillie is not that guy.From what I've seen, he'll do until another comes along.My opinion of Bettman has been driven so low, anybody he so despises starts to look pretty good. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh_cat_eyes Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 So apparently the NHL's offer was only 140 million. That is a complete JOKE compared to Balsillie's offer of 212 million. The only way I can see Reinsdorf being involved in the deal with the NHL is if the NHL was to get the team before the auction. I am going to asume it will be NHL versus Balsillie in the auction and if Balsillie wins and the NHL terminates his franchise, he'll just file a massive 250 million dollar lawsuit against them or something. That's obviously not what the NHL wants. And don't even say he won't do it either, because he'll have every right too, and he will. He would have bought the team fair and square...even if it was through the back door. Also, even if he said he insists on playing the team in Hamilton this year, he would likely except it if the NHL made him play in the Pacific Division. So they'd still have no reason to terminate his franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njmeadowlanders Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 I'm starting to wonder if the REAL reason the NHL is fighting this so hard is that they're worried that other cities may soon be in the same boat, and that rather than a rare circumstance, that this type of problem could soon be coming to a city near you....especially the Icelanders with their repeated failed attempts at a new or revamped Nassau Mausoleum...I mean, these owners didn't get rich by accident or by dumb luck. Money doesn't lie. There just HAS to be some other motive than a judge potentially ruling that a franchise is a portable asset, right? If it were strictly about the money, they would've already been across the border... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 So apparently the NHL's offer was only 140 million. That is a complete JOKE compared to Balsillie's offer of 212 million. The only way I can see Reinsdorf being involved in the deal with the NHL is if the NHL was to get the team before the auction. I am going to asume it will be NHL versus Balsillie in the auction and if Balsillie wins and the NHL terminates his franchise, he'll just file a massive 250 million dollar lawsuit against them or something. That's obviously not what the NHL wants. And don't even say he won't do it either, because he'll have every right too, and he will. He would have bought the team fair and square...even if it was through the back door. Also, even if he said he insists on playing the team in Hamilton this year, he would likely except it if the NHL made him play in the Pacific Division. So they'd still have no reason to terminate his franchise.The NHL has already unanimously rejected Balsillie as an owner they want in their league. That alone is all the right they need to dissolve the franchise if it is granted to him.Of course he's welcome to file a lawsuit. It will be a waste of time, however. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 I'm starting to wonder if the REAL reason the NHL is fighting this so hard is that they're worried that other cities may soon be in the same boat, and that rather than a rare circumstance, that this type of problem could soon be coming to a city near you....especially the Icelanders with their repeated failed attempts at a new or revamped Nassau Mausoleum...I mean, these owners didn't get rich by accident or by dumb luck. Money doesn't lie. There just HAS to be some other motive than a judge potentially ruling that a franchise is a portable asset, right? If it were strictly about the money, they would've already been across the border...Money may not lie, but team owners do. They cry poor and then ask cities (aka taxpayers) to cough up money for faculties and tax breaks or they will move. The Isles cannot fund proper financing since banks and bond holders know that that arenas are generally money losing propositions. Why does Tom Hicks want to dump the Rangers and Gillett sold the Canadiens? Because they need that cash to finance a new Liverpool Stadium and there is little public money to be had from the local coffers. They know that Liverpool is a global brand, and know that there is more money there than within the Stars, Rangers and Canadiens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njmeadowlanders Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 I'm starting to wonder if the REAL reason the NHL is fighting this so hard is that they're worried that other cities may soon be in the same boat, and that rather than a rare circumstance, that this type of problem could soon be coming to a city near you....especially the Icelanders with their repeated failed attempts at a new or revamped Nassau Mausoleum...I mean, these owners didn't get rich by accident or by dumb luck. Money doesn't lie. There just HAS to be some other motive than a judge potentially ruling that a franchise is a portable asset, right? If it were strictly about the money, they would've already been across the border...Money may not lie, but team owners do. They cry poor and then ask cities (aka taxpayers) to cough up money for faculties and tax breaks or they will move. The Isles cannot fund proper financing since banks and bond holders know that that arenas are generally money losing propositions. Why does Tom Hicks want to dump the Rangers and Gillett sold the Canadiens? Because they need that cash to finance a new Liverpool Stadium and there is little public money to be had from the local coffers. They know that Liverpool is a global brand, and know that there is more money there than within the Stars, Rangers and Canadiens.Yes...their own teams though.The Coyotes will be costing them millions without anything in return. That's a big difference here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DelayedPenalty Posted August 28, 2009 Share Posted August 28, 2009 Just wanted to let you guys know that when I win $325 million Mega Millions jackpot tomorrow I will personally buy the Coyotes. I'll let you all have a stake for $100,000 a piece, and we will run the team in the name of Creamer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.