Most quality lopsided matchups

[Phils Phan]

What are some uniform matchups you can think of where the difference in the quality of the two uniforms were among the biggest. This is undoubtably my pick:

[Buster]

Quality in design or quality of the product?

If you mean quality of design, I'd have to say anytime the Cowboys mish-mashed uniforms match up against a quality uniform.

Super Bowl XLVI is a glaring example of low-qualitry vs. high quality. I hate the Elvis logo but the Patrots' uniforms are always consistent from player to player and and look good. They actually look professional and he Giants uniforms always look like practice gear.

If you mean quality of product, anyone playing the Colts under Reebok. They were horrible, from the stripes that weren't consistent from player to player and were done correctly on NO ONE's jersey to the varried sizes of numerals. I recall Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie had an exceptionally bad jersey. Some players' shoulder stripes went below the nameplate and some stripes ended above the name.

The Jets had and still have similar issues with the shoulder stripes.

Then there are quality issues like this:

[Phils Phan]

I meant quality in design but enjoy the second half of your post nonetheless.

[phutmasterflex]

So basically a really good uniform look vs a really bad uniform look?

[Buster]

I meant quality in design but enjoy the second half of your post nonetheless.

So basically a really good uniform look vs a really bad uniform look?

From just yesterday:

Earlier this year:

If throwbacks count:

Switching sports:

[29texan]

So basically a really good uniform look vs a really bad uniform look?

From just yesterday:

I'm not defending the miss-match of blue and silver, but there are FAR worse uniforms...

[OffCenteredScoreboard]

best jerseys in the NHL (and in sports) vs possibly the worst

[oldschoolvikings]

Quality in design or quality of the product?

If you mean quality of design, I'd have to say anytime the Cowboys mish-mashed uniforms match up against a quality uniform.

Super Bowl XLVI is a glaring example of low-qualitry vs. high quality. I hate the Elvis logo but the Patrots' uniforms are always consistent from player to player and and look good. They actually look professional and he Giants uniforms always look like practice gear.

Weird. When I saw this picture, I assumed you were going in the opposite direction. Those Giant road uniforms are perfection, while the Pats uniform is a 90's relic.

[VikWings]

What are some uniform matchups you can think of where the difference in the quality of the two uniforms were among the biggest. This is undoubtably my pick:

I think we can end the thread right here. lol.

[VikWings]

Quality in design or quality of the product?

If you mean quality of design, I'd have to say anytime the Cowboys mish-mashed uniforms match up against a quality uniform.

Super Bowl XLVI is a glaring example of low-qualitry vs. high quality. I hate the Elvis logo but the Patrots' uniforms are always consistent from player to player and and look good. They actually look professional and he Giants uniforms always look like practice gear.

Weird. When I saw this picture, I assumed you were going in the opposite direction. Those Giant road uniforms are perfection, while the Pats uniform is a 90's relic.

The Giants jerseys need some blue in there somewhere. For a team nicknamed "Big Blue" the only blue on their away unis is the helmet and a thin stripe on the pants.

[oldschoolvikings]

actually, I'm pretty sure they're nicknamed "the Giants."

[phutmasterflex]

actually, I'm pretty sure they're nicknamed "the Giants."

That's their official name. They are also known as Big Blue.

[OnWis97]

Quality in design or quality of the product?

If you mean quality of design, I'd have to say anytime the Cowboys mish-mashed uniforms match up against a quality uniform.

Super Bowl XLVI is a glaring example of low-qualitry vs. high quality. I hate the Elvis logo but the Patrots' uniforms are always consistent from player to player and and look good. They actually look professional and he Giants uniforms always look like practice gear.

If you mean quality of product, anyone playing the Colts under Reebok. They were horrible, from the stripes that weren't consistent from player to player and were done correctly on NO ONE's jersey to the varried sizes of numerals. I recall Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie had an exceptionally bad jersey. Some players' shoulder stripes went below the nameplate and some stripes ended above the name.

The Jets had and still have similar issues with the shoulder stripes.

Then there are quality issues like this:

(TYPOS)

While the typos I deleted to save space are sorta one-time things, these Colts stripes are a great example of "poor quality" that the OP did not really mean. The Colts seem to have trouble with player-to-player consistency. However, with new "performance" templates, it seems to be an issue that can pop on on any team. For example, the this does not seem to happen a lot to the Packers, but I remember Jermichael Finley's jersey looking a little Wal-Martish at times.

As to the original question, did anyone ever wear TATC vs. the Yankees? That would be a pretty good example.

[Morgan33]

best jerseys in the NHL (and in sports) vs possibly the worst

Definitely lopsided but I'd argue that Calgary and Colorado have worse uniforms. How about the Red Chicago jersey vs Calgary's white...

[mad43dog]

[Unocal]

The infamous Seahawk neon green uniforms of 2009 game also stood out because it came against a team with one of football's most traditional and iconic uniforms:

[TVIXX]

Just wait till the packers face the buccaneers this year

[tBBP]

If you mean quality of product, anyone playing the Colts under Reebok. They were horrible, from the stripes that weren't consistent from player to player and were done correctly on NO ONE's jersey to the varried sizes of numerals. I recall Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie had an exceptionally bad jersey. Some players' shoulder stripes went below the nameplate and some stripes ended above the name.

Then there are quality issues like this:

(TYPOS)

While the typos I deleted to save space are sorta one-time things, these Colts stripes are a great example of "poor quality" that the OP did not really mean. The Colts seem to have trouble with player-to-player consistency. However, with new "performance" templates, it seems to be an issue that can pop on on any team. For example, the this does not seem to happen a lot to the Packers, but I remember Jermichael Finley's jersey looking a little Wal-Martish at times.

Looking back at those now...how much do those now seem to have been test runs for what ended up becoming adidas' TechFit? For some reason I remember thinking that to myself at the time...I think the first edition of what they ended up calling TechFit popped up around this same time.

[mad43dog]

Quality in design or quality of the product?

If you mean quality of design, I'd have to say anytime the Cowboys mish-mashed uniforms match up against a quality uniform.

Super Bowl XLVI is a glaring example of low-qualitry vs. high quality. I hate the Elvis logo but the Patrots' uniforms are always consistent from player to player and and look good. They actually look professional and he Giants uniforms always look like practice gear.

If you mean quality of product, anyone playing the Colts under Reebok. They were horrible, from the stripes that weren't consistent from player to player and were done correctly on NO ONE's jersey to the varried sizes of numerals. I recall Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie had an exceptionally bad jersey. Some players' shoulder stripes went below the nameplate and some stripes ended above the name.

The Jets had and still have similar issues with the shoulder stripes.

Then there are quality issues like this:

(TYPOS)

While the typos I deleted to save space are sorta one-time things, these Colts stripes are a great example of "poor quality" that the OP did not really mean. The Colts seem to have trouble with player-to-player consistency. However, with new "performance" templates, it seems to be an issue that can pop on on any team. For example, the this does not seem to happen a lot to the Packers, but I remember Jermichael Finley's jersey looking a little Wal-Martish at times.

As to the original question, did anyone ever wear TATC vs. the Yankees? That would be a pretty good example.

The Yankees played the Indians in July of 1999. I can't find a picture but I think that's when the Indians wore turn ahead

[GriffinM6]

If you mean quality of product, anyone playing the Colts under Reebok. They were horrible, from the stripes that weren't consistent from player to player and were done correctly on NO ONE's jersey to the varried sizes of numerals. I recall Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie had an exceptionally bad jersey. Some players' shoulder stripes went below the nameplate and some stripes ended above the name.

Then there are quality issues like this:

(TYPOS)

While the typos I deleted to save space are sorta one-time things, these Colts stripes are a great example of "poor quality" that the OP did not really mean. The Colts seem to have trouble with player-to-player consistency. However, with new "performance" templates, it seems to be an issue that can pop on on any team. For example, the this does not seem to happen a lot to the Packers, but I remember Jermichael Finley's jersey looking a little Wal-Martish at times.

Looking back at those now...how much do those now seem to have been test runs for what ended up becoming adidas' TechFit? For some reason I remember thinking that to myself at the time...I think the first edition of what they ended up calling TechFit popped up around this same time.

Those were the original techfits. Reebok had been bought by Adidas, so they offered some teams the template for players to wear. College teams had begun wearing it the same year or maybe a year before in 09 or 10.