Jump to content

MLB Stadium Saga: Oakland/Tampa Bay/Southside


So_Fla

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, gosioux76 said:

 

Reading some of the additional coverage from down there, apparently the idea is that having a stadium as the anchor of a broader development district will make the location more of a draw. So instead of only going their for a ballgame, it would feature restaurants, shops and probably living spaces that would make it more of a destination.

Exactly, they’re looking in the direction of what the Braves have done.

 

Tampa proper might be the preferable location, but if St Pete cooperating keeps the team in the Tampa Bay area, then so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tropicana Field isn't in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico, it's right off of 275 in downtown St. Pete. Not ideal, but nearly as much of a hassle as Glendale or Sunrise. This new hipster fantasy that the team would suddenly become a local institution and pack the house if they were in downtown Tampa instead is just that.

 

If you want attendance to become somewhat respectable, rig the schedule so that the Red Sox, Yankees, Mets, and Phillies are the only visiting teams coming through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, GDAWG said:

 

 

HA!! That is hilarious.

 

Wellp—time to train them sights on Nashville!! 😄

*Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. 😁

|| dribbble || Behance ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. Honestly? :censored: the A’s. If ownership is going to be this shameless about begging cities to pay for the majority of their toy while also keeping all of the profits, then they can kick rocks. Best solution for the A’s at this point? Contract them. Make it a Browns style deal where they can come back as an expansion team if someone else has the better financial ability to do so. If not? Relegate them to the past.  

  • Like 2
  • Huh? 1

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FiddySicks said:

Good. Honestly? :censored: the A’s. If ownership is going to be this shameless about begging cities to pay for the majority of their toy while also keeping all of the profits, then they can kick rocks. Best solution for the A’s at this point? Contract them. Make it a Browns style deal where they can come back as an expansion team if someone else has the better financial ability to do so. If not? Relegate them to the past.  

 

MLB Players Association is not going to accept any type of contraction, even if it's a Browns style deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GDAWG said:

 

MLB Players Association is not going to accept any type of contraction, even if it's a Browns style deal. 

Whether a shred of connection to being possible exists doesn't mean someone won't believe it to be possible.

It's where I sit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FiddySicks said:

Good. Honestly? :censored: the A’s. If ownership is going to be this shameless about begging cities to pay for the majority of their toy while also keeping all of the profits, then they can kick rocks. Best solution for the A’s at this point? Contract them. Make it a Browns style deal where they can come back as an expansion team if someone else has the better financial ability to do so. If not? Relegate them to the past.  

Who else are you going to contract in this situation? Can't just be one team.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Red Comet said:

 

The Marlins? And then move the Rays to Miami. 

I've always thought they should have moved the Rays to Miami so that they'd get a new stadium and Miami  would finally get a well-run, always-contending team. But there is no way contraction will ever happen, so they would've just been relocated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, McCall said:

I've always thought they should have moved the Rays to Miami so that they'd get a new stadium and Miami  would finally get a well-run, always-contending team. But there is no way contraction will ever happen, so they would've just been relocated.

 

A MLB club splitting home games between Tampa Bay & Miami always seemed to make more sense than the ridiculous Montreal-Tampa shared team proposal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.