Jump to content

Washington Nationals name dispute?


Waffles

Recommended Posts

Since current American conservatism tries its hardest not to recognize anything before 1980 (except that Carter wore cardigans and some silly little court decision in 1973), they figure most people won't notice or care.

You must not remember much before 1980 then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Seriously, they've named everything else after him.  I hear they want his face to replace FDR's on the dime.

Actually, they want to knock Hamilton off of the ten dollar bill. Since current American conservatism tries its hardest not to recognize anything before 1980 (except that Carter wore cardigans and some silly little court decision in 1973), they figure most people won't notice or care.

That's my other genius plan for exploiting Reagan worship. The government could save hundreds of millions of dollars if we would just scrap the $1 bill in favor of $1 coins. So my plan is to put Reagan on the quarter, put Washington on the new $1 coin, replace Jefferson and Lincoln on either their coins or their bills (with Teddy Roosevelt or Eisenhower and Truman or Grover Cleveland to maintain historical partisan balance), and eliminate the $1 bill. It puts the Gipper on money like his backers want and it reduces wasteful government spending, which actually seems to me to be an even better way to honor the man's memory than sticking his name on stuff.

Since I'm something of a Washington, Jackson, and Lincoln fetishist myself, I find the Reagan mania basically unobjectionable, regardless of what I might think of the guy. I just wish people weren't still so bitter over his presidency that they can't focus on exploiting the right's Gipper idolatry to help accomplish stuff.

20082614447.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since current American conservatism tries its hardest not to recognize anything before 1980 (except that Carter wore cardigans and some silly little court decision in 1973), they figure most people won't notice or care. 

You must not remember much before 1980 then.

That's technically true. I am physically unable to remember anything that happened before 1980, and for that matter, summer of 1981.

1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said:

and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem: The only snappy syllable you can extract from that to turn into a nickname is the "Cans."

Nice logo work, though.

At least out here, we shorten Americans to Ams, as in the Tri-City Ams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were my country to run, briefly, you'd see the following money situation.

COINS

5¢ - Thomas Jefferson (5 g, 21.21 x 1.95 mm, 75% cupro-nickel, smooth edge)

10¢ - Franklin Roosevelt (2.27 g, 17.91 x 1.35 mm, 92% cupro-nickel, reeded edge)

25¢ - George Washington (5.67 g, 24.26 x 1.75 mm, 92% cupro-nickel, reeded edge)

50¢ - John F. Kennedy (11.34 g, 30.61 x 2.15 mm, 92% cupro-nickel, reeded edge)

$1 - Sacajawea (8.1 g, 26.50 x 2.00 mm, 88.5% cupro-zinc-manganesse-nickel, smooth edge)

BILLS

$5 - Abraham Lincoln (pink, 63.50 x 139.70 mm)

$10 - Alexander Hamilton (yellow, 63.50 x 146.05 mm)

$20 - Andrew Jackson (green, 63.50 x 152.40 mm)

$50 - Ulysses S. Grant (blue, 63.50 x 158.75 mm)

$100 - Benjamin Franklin (tan, 63.50 x 165.10 mm)

$500 - William McKinley (orange, 63.50 x 171.45 mm)

LvZYtbZ.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be wrong, but I thought the mint was printing no more $500 bills. And the new $1 coin will feature all the Presidents of the United States (don't ask me how that will work).

Anyways, if it were up to me, I would put Reagan on the $10, and take out the One Cent piece alltogether. I would also change the name of the team in Washington to the Senators because 1) It's full of them, just not representing them, and 2) Most people who support the Rangers HATE their breif history in Washington, and would beg to give it away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I will probably be crucified by someone for asking this, but why is Reagan worthy of (1) having damn near every government building named after him and (2) consideration for being added to currency . . . at someone else's expense? I turned 13 in 1980, so I know the history. Just explain why the history warrants such over-the-top tributes.

Most Liked Content of the Day -- February 15, 2017, August 21, 2017, August 22, 2017     /////      Proud Winner of the CCSLC Post of the Day Award -- April 8, 2008

Originator of the Upside Down Sarcasm Smilie -- November 1, 2005  🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I will probably be crucified by someone for asking this, but why is Reagan worthy of (1) having damn near every government building named after him and (2) consideration for being added to currency . . . at someone else's expense? I turned 13 in 1980, so I know the history. Just explain why the history warrants such over-the-top tributes.

Someone has a previous post calling Ronald Reagan (tongue-in-cheek, I'm sure) THE GREATEST AMERICAN PRESIDENT OF ALL TIME!!!!.

I think that there are those in power that wouldn't mind eliminating American history before 1980. I think that there are those in power today who inflated communism to be (again) THE GREATEST THREAT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY!!! and see Reagan as the one true reason the USSR doesn't exist anymore. Ergo, the slayer of our greatest tormentor deserves all possible veneration.

How they (you know which "they" I'm talking about) square this with the first commandment, I'll never know.

1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said:

and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I will probably be crucified by someone for asking this, but why is Reagan worthy of (1) having damn near every government building named after him and (2) consideration for being added to currency . . . at someone else's expense?  I turned 13 in 1980, so I know the history.  Just explain why the history warrants such over-the-top tributes.

Someone has a previous post calling Ronald Reagan (tongue-in-cheek, I'm sure) THE GREATEST AMERICAN PRESIDENT OF ALL TIME!!!!.

I think that there are those in power that wouldn't mind eliminating American history before 1980. I think that there are those in power today who inflated communism to be (again) THE GREATEST THREAT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY!!! and see Reagan as the one true reason the USSR doesn't exist anymore. Ergo, the slayer of our greatest tormentor deserves all possible veneration.

How they (you know which "they" I'm talking about) square this with the first commandment, I'll never know.

I suspect "they" square it by saying he is not a god before God, but simply a great man worthy of honor. The harder part would seem to be squaring it with massive budget deficits, resulting intractable federal debt, Iran-Contra, elimination of numerous social programs at the expense of those least able to bear their elimination and that sort of thing.

Most Liked Content of the Day -- February 15, 2017, August 21, 2017, August 22, 2017     /////      Proud Winner of the CCSLC Post of the Day Award -- April 8, 2008

Originator of the Upside Down Sarcasm Smilie -- November 1, 2005  🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$5 - Abraham Lincoln (pink, 63.50 x 139.70 mm)

$10 - Alexander Hamilton (yellow, 63.50 x 146.05 mm)

$20 - Andrew Jackson (green, 63.50 x 152.40 mm)

$50 - Ulysses S. Grant (blue, 63.50 x 158.75 mm)

$100 - Benjamin Franklin (tan, 63.50 x 165.10 mm)

$500 - William McKinley (orange, 63.50 x 171.45 mm)

Pink Lincoln? What's your malfunction? The Great Emancipator deserves better than pink. Bunch of Monopoly-money nonsense you got here.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How they (you know which "they" I'm talking about) square this with the first commandment, I'll never know.

Yeah. THEM. Those which cannot be named.

Also, I'd say having Communists working in the State Department probably wasn't ideal.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How they (you know which "they" I'm talking about) square this with the first commandment, I'll never know.

Yeah. THEM. Those which cannot be named.

Also, I'd say having Communists working in the State Department probably wasn't ideal.

Better communists than facists. Zing!

1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said:

and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be wrong, but I thought the mint was printing no more $500 bills.

You're right, $500 bills are no longer being printed. However, banknotes are printed by the US Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

And the new $1 coin will feature all the Presidents of the United States (don't ask me how that will work).

And here is some information on the Presidential $1 Coin Act of 2005.

"If things have gone wrong, I'm talking to myself, and you've got a wet towel wrapped around your head."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alexander Hamilton was the ULTIMATE conservative, and I don't think there's a member of the GOP who would think differently.

Anyone who wants a good read on Hamilton should read Ron Chernow's book. A bit long, but an EXCELLENT read on a guy who is highly underappreciated today.

By the way, does anyone think that the William Henry Harrison $1 coin will be a big seller?

I didn't collect the state quarters (although now I have kids, I'll probably go back and get them all), but I'm going to collect the presidential dollar coins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.