WhitecapsForLife11 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Not sure if this has been said yet but the new Charlotte Hornets jerseys aren't up yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Don't have those NHL helmet marks...wish I did. Here are the current New York Rangers uniform scripts - aside from the color differences, I'm not seeing much of a difference between what the Mothership has, and my own official graphics: Home Uniform Script - 2003-2004 through present: Road Uniform Script - 2003-2004 through present: Alternate Uniform Script - 2010-2011 through present: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kewp80 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Man those 'RANGERS' scripts just look weird and awkward. It's like the outline couldn't decide to be just an outline or a drop shadow. Plus the shadow seems to be dropping opposite ways on some letters. WTF mate? Quote Cardinals -- Rams -- Blues -- Tigers -- Liverpool Check out my music! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 The lettering looks different here to me, mostly in the corner of the G, but it could just be a case where the official graphics don't match the real-life stuff. I've been trying to get to the bottom of the Blackhawks' logo thing and it's just a great big mess. I don't think they finally standardized the well-drawn half-smiling Indian Head until 2000 or so. This looks more right to me, but the rendering seems a little sloppy. The letters aren't the same size, come on Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 ... The lettering looks different here to me, mostly in the corner of the G, but it could just be a case where the official graphics don't match the real-life stuff. I've been trying to get to the bottom of the Blackhawks' logo thing and it's just a great big mess. I don't think they finally standardized the well-drawn half-smiling Indian Head until 2000 or so. I agree re: official vs. actual. I addressed some of the Blackhawks logo issues a few years ago; I'll try to find what I came up with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Oregon needs some updating: http://www.sportslogos.net/logos/list_by_team/797/Oregon_Ducks/At the least, it's probably time to add this guy: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kewp80 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Oregon needs constant updating... Quote Cardinals -- Rams -- Blues -- Tigers -- Liverpool Check out my music! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizzaman7294 Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 ...The lettering looks different here to me, mostly in the corner of the G, but it could just be a case where the official graphics don't match the real-life stuff. I've been trying to get to the bottom of the Blackhawks' logo thing and it's just a great big mess. I don't think they finally standardized the well-drawn half-smiling Indian Head until 2000 or so.I agree re: official vs. actual.I addressed some of the Blackhawks logo issues a few years ago; I'll try to find what I came up with.Found it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Might be time to update the AL Champs. I'm not positive, but I assume they ditched the black shadowing on their logos by nowwww.sportslogos.net/logos/view/fmrl2b6xf5hruiike42gn62yu/Kansas_City_Royals/2002/Primary_Logowww.sportslogos.net/logos/view/yopnkgblwibmfwv4rx1h/Kansas_City_Royals/2006/Alternate_Logo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Still not sure about that. Just today, my friend posted a picture of her brother holding up an old Hawks shirt, probably from the late '80s/early '90s: And that's clearly none of the logos in that timeline. You can tell by the eye: what's supposed to be the pupil, I guess, is much pointier in that '80s/'90s logo. Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Might be time to update the AL Champs. I'm not positive, but I assume they ditched the black shadowing on their logos by now www.sportslogos.net/logos/view/fmrl2b6xf5hruiike42gn62yu/Kansas_City_Royals/2002/Primary_Logo www.sportslogos.net/logos/view/yopnkgblwibmfwv4rx1h/Kansas_City_Royals/2006/Alternate_Logo The Black is still on there...I posted all of the correct Royals' primary marks earlier in the thread. Still not sure about that. Just today, my friend posted a picture of her brother holding up an old Hawks shirt, probably from the late '80s/early '90s: ... And that's clearly none of the logos in that timeline. You can tell by the eye: what's supposed to be the pupil, I guess, is much pointier in that '80s/'90s logo. Another example of "official" graphics not always being in sync with what's actually worn. Oh - and vector graphics really didn't exist until the early '90s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Another example of "official" graphics not always being in sync with what's actually worn. Oh - and vector graphics really didn't exist until the early '90s. Watching a Red Wings-Blackhawks game from the 1995 playoffs, it's the what's-worn Indian Head with the tan keyline on the sweaters, but the vector version on the ice and in the graphics. Interesting stuff. You'd have to think that if any logo would be subject to all the vagaries of different means of reproduction at a time when everything is getting really technical, it would be the Blackhawks' primary. Remember, too, the secondary logo with the tomahawks and C was totally different between fabric (one-serifed wishbone C) and graphic (sans-serif) for years. It might even still be, but the mothership has taken to only counting the fabric one. Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 Another example of "official" graphics not always being in sync with what's actually worn. Oh - and vector graphics really didn't exist until the early '90s. Watching a Red Wings-Blackhawks game from the 1995 playoffs, it's the what's-worn Indian Head with the tan keyline on the sweaters, but the vector version on the ice and in the graphics. Interesting stuff. You'd have to think that if any logo would be subject to all the vagaries of different means of reproduction at a time when everything is getting really technical, it would be the Blackhawks' primary. Remember, too, the secondary logo with the tomahawks and C was totally different between fabric (one-serifed wishbone C) and graphic (sans-serif) for years. It might even still be, but the mothership has taken to only counting the fabric one. Yep - the official version has the sans-serif one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taantumus Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Nobody probably gives two :censored:s about European hockey, but since Jokerit has such a great logo, it's good to know they wore this travesty in the wild 90's. 1998-2000 to be exact.I'm guessing it won't end up on the site, but whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zilch Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 Might be time to update the AL Champs. I'm not positive, but I assume they ditched the black shadowing on their logos by nowwww.sportslogos.net/logos/view/fmrl2b6xf5hruiike42gn62yu/Kansas_City_Royals/2002/Primary_Logowww.sportslogos.net/logos/view/yopnkgblwibmfwv4rx1h/Kansas_City_Royals/2006/Alternate_LogoThe Black is still on there...I posted all of the correct Royals' primary marks earlier in the thread.Still not sure about that. Just today, my friend posted a picture of her brother holding up an old Hawks shirt, probably from the late '80s/early '90s:...And that's clearly none of the logos in that timeline. You can tell by the eye: what's supposed to be the pupil, I guess, is much pointier in that '80s/'90s logo.Another example of "official" graphics not always being in sync with what's actually worn. Oh - and vector graphics really didn't exist until the early '90s.I also have seen this problem with the Hawks logo, I'm recreating the blues initial innaugural game ticket from the kiel center and it has a completely different Hawks logo than any of the ones I have. It's has the more pointed eye, white outline around the earing, different hair shape and kinda minor head dress issues. I'll try to post a pic later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cokeologist Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 On the St. Louis Cardinals page:The jersey logo shown as 1924 - 1948 is actually 1936 - 1948The jersey logo shown as 1957 - 1997 is actually 1966 - 1997The jersey logo shown as 1998 - Pres is actually 1999 - PresReferencing the below, none of the jersey logos prior to 1936, or the 1949 - 1950, 1956, 1957 - 1965, or 1998 jersey logos are on the Cardinals' mothership pageThis is from a logo catalog created by the CardinalsI have the official versions of all of them...will post later.Just checking on status for posting these Cardinals jersey logos. Thanks for your service to the forum community. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Working on the Baseball Cardinals...meanwhile, here's a retrospective of their primary marks... Primary Mark - 1927 through 1947: Alternate Primary Mark - 1928 through 1939: Second Alternate Primary Mark - circa 1930s through 1940s: Primary Mark - 1949 through 1965: Alternate Primary Mark - 1965 through 1966: Primary Mark - 1966 through 1997: Primary Mark - 1998: Primary Mark - 1999 through present: We addressed this years ago on this board, but the redesign in 1998 originally had a Red beak on the bird (as well as on the "bird on a bat" uniform script) initially. Was modified in 1999. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brave-Bird 08 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 The Atlanta Hawks new primary logo. The old one is not used anywhere on their website, court, or uniforms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 The Atlanta Hawks new primary logo. The old one is not used anywhere on their website, court, or uniforms. The primary mark did not change. The logo you're referring to is the new secondary mark: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brave-Bird 08 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 If you go to Hawks.com, look at the court, uniforms, or anywhere else, the primary is clearly being phased out. It's nowhere on the team website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.