cajunaggie08 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 A new Texas A&M logo was discovered on the corps website. Its similar to the old logo, but the A and the M are slightly larger and this has to be the ugliest attempt at beveling i have ever seen. I dont know what the hell this is, if it official, or what. If this is actually the new logo, i'll be pissed.http://www.aggiecorps.org/index.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 am I mistaken or has a beveled version of the aTm been around for a while? heh, maybe I'm thinking of the one where only the T's beveled. A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krona Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 i was watching CSTV earlier and A&M wears that logo on their track gear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitedawg22 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Ugh. Is there something wrong with block letters all of a sudden? Don't the teams with the most recognizable letter logos (e.g. Michigan, Minnesota, USC, UNC) just use plain block letters? oh ,my god ,i strong recommend you to have a visit on the website ,or if i'm the president ,i would have an barceque with the anthor of the articel . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VitaminD Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Ugh. Is there something wrong with block letters all of a sudden? Don't the teams with the most recognizable letter logos (e.g. Michigan, Minnesota, USC, UNC) just use plain block letters?UNC's monogram may be simple (that is, no beveling or drop shadowing), but it's not block lettering. The letters have been rounded and curvy for quite a while now. I think I know what you meant though. Then again, Rutgers calls its monogram a Block R despite a large portion of it being curved, so my distinction may be moot altogether. "Start spreading the news... They're leavin' today... Won't get to be a part of it... In old New York..."In order for the Mets' run of 12 losses in 17 games to mean something, the Phillies still had to win 13 of 17. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VC// Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 I must be perverted...I see the aTm logo and think..."A** To Mouth"...lol LETS GO PENGUINS! 5x Stanley Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cajunaggie08 Posted May 19, 2007 Author Share Posted May 19, 2007 Heres a better version of the new one and here are the 2 old ones for comparison. The difference is that the A and the M are slightly bigger and beveled. Plus our maroon has been changed to a lighter color. I'm not sure what will end up on our helmets.newold 1old 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinkkre8tiv Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Heres a better version of the new one and here are the 2 old ones for comparison. The difference is that the A and the M are slightly bigger and beveled. Plus our maroon has been changed to a lighter color. I'm not sure what will end up on our helmets.newold 1old 2Either way your still gonna be aggies:)Go Sooners! BartODell.comPublished LogoLounge 4, 5, 6 & 8 , LogoLounge Master Series 1, 2, 3, & 4 , Really Good Logos , LogoNest 3: B&W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 I must be perverted...I see the aTm logo and think..."A** To Mouth"...lolHow amusing it must be for you to do your banking. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommytimp Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 I must be perverted...I see the aTm logo and think..."A** To Mouth"...lolDammit, you never go aTm!I prefer Old 2. Aggie Simple. "The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that it's hard to verify their authenticity."--Abraham Lincoln Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL FANATIC Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 I'm pretty bad at beveling too, so I tend to stay away from it, but on block letters...c'mon...By my count the amoung of bevel shadings missing on each letter:T: 3A: 5M: 6That's pitiful. JUSTIN STRIEBEL | PORTFOLIO | RESUME | CONTACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman1211 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 I must be perverted...I see the aTm logo and think..."A** To Mouth"...lol Ummm.... No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmore55 Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 I'm pretty bad at beveling too, so I tend to stay away from it, but on block letters...c'mon...By my count the amoung of bevel shadings missing on each letter:T: 3A: 5M: 6That's pitiful.First of all aggies make no sense. But I don't think this is a new logo. More like an artist's interpretation to professionalize the website.Hook'em Horns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bouj Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 I thought they had been wearing that "shaded" or "beveled" or whatever-you-want-to-call-it version of the logo for a few years now. I just recently saw it and didn't think anythign of it. But then again, I see a lot of A&M stuff daily, so I don't pay that much attention.Isn't there some Aggie historian on this board who could answer this definitively? Go Astros!Go Texans!Go Rockets!Go Javelinas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJTALBOT Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 The new logo's color looks much lighter. PANTONE? Everyone loves a roundel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cola Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 I honestly thought there has always been a version with that beveling. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Survival79 Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 Fixed it. "If things have gone wrong, I'm talking to myself, and you've got a wet towel wrapped around your head." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmore55 Posted May 21, 2007 Share Posted May 21, 2007 I thought they had been wearing that "shaded" or "beveled" or whatever-you-want-to-call-it version of the logo for a few years now. I just recently saw it and didn't think anythign of it. But then again, I see a lot of A&M stuff daily, so I don't pay that much attention.Isn't there some Aggie historian on this board who could answer this definitively?I just can't see a new a&m logo being leaked from the core. If it was a new logo I think it would have leaked some where else before it got to the core. The core doesn't seem like the place were change is going to happen. The idea that this logo has been around for a while, is probably correct. I heard that a&m was going to switch to Adidas, maybe they want to use this version of the logo. 3 game sweep in baseball to clinch the Lone Star Showdown title. Hook'em Horns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vicfurth Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Okay, first off, it's "corps", as in military, not "core". Crazy teasippers...As for the logo, A&M has had beveling for some time. The catch is it has never been on the A or M, only the T. They've also had a T-star which is also beveled.Personally, I don't like any beveling. It screws up a very solid college logo that has had great staying power, with few variations. It is better than the outlined garbage they used to have, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmore55 Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Okay, first off, it's "corps", as in military, not "core". Crazy teasippers...As for the logo, A&M has had beveling for some time. The catch is it has never been on the A or M, only the T. They've also had a T-star which is also beveled.Personally, I don't like any beveling. It screws up a very solid college logo that has had great staying power, with few variations. It is better than the outlined garbage they used to have, though.sorry for the complete misspelling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.