Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, TBGKon said:

While it may be a fixed roof, I believe they're going to have the Vikings type of ETFE roof, which is transparent, lightweight, and durable material.  There's also being thought that it will have some wall panels that can open up on the sides to allow some of the outside in, while still remaining covered.

 

I'm sure it will be an improvement, but I guess I'm just a traditionalist who thinks that baseball should be played outside as much as possible. I've also seen firsthand the difference it makes at Jays' games when the roof is open compared to when it's closed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TBGKon said:

If the goal is to include a Battery Atlanta style district, St Petersburg may be the only option.  I don't believe that any of the currently considered sites on the Tampa side would allow for that.

 

And I just don't understand why a place that's allegedly so bad to drive to will become a place that people will attract people to live.  Location, location, location.  I currently commute about 90mins each way to work (30 miles via transit or car with traffic) but most people aren't like me and want to live that far away from their job, and I'm assuming most people's job isn't near the stadium (or it'd be easier for them to go to games.)

 

This just sounds like doubling down (actually, tripling down) on existing issues.

  • Like 1

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spartacat_12 said:

 

I'm sure it will be an improvement, but I guess I'm just a traditionalist who thinks that baseball should be played outside as much as possible. I've also seen firsthand the difference it makes at Jays' games when the roof is open compared to when it's closed.

Your opinion is valid.  I just know that if Tampa Bay (and Miami for that matter) didn't have a roof, you would have an excessive amount of rain delays/postponements between June and September.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TBGKon said:

Your opinion is valid.  I just know that if Tampa Bay (and Miami for that matter) didn't have a roof, you would have an excessive amount of rain delays/postponements between June and September.

And then the days it weren’t raining would be miserable to sit through as a fan. Having natural light with a climate controlled environment is the best solution. I’m thinking something like SoFi Stadiums roof will be the end result.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spartacat_12 said:

 

I'm sure it will be an improvement, but I guess I'm just a traditionalist who thinks that baseball should be played outside as much as possible. I've also seen firsthand the difference it makes at Jays' games when the roof is open compared to when it's closed.

That's Toronto, not Florida in the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spartacat_12 said:

 

I'm sure it will be an improvement, but I guess I'm just a traditionalist who thinks that baseball should be played outside as much as possible. I've also seen firsthand the difference it makes at Jays' games when the roof is open compared to when it's closed.

 

The reason the Rangers are playing in a Costco Warehouse is because they want 40,000+ fans in attendance for all 81 games whether it's night or day.  They couldn't do that with their old ballpark (which is now a football/soccer stadium for MLS Next Pro North Texas SC, XFL Arlington Renegades and Major League Rugby's Dallas Jackals) because nobody wants to attend a Rangers game when the average temperature on a weekday afternoon in June, July and August is 102.  Even when the Rangers were winning, nobody was in attendance at day games.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TBGKon said:

While it may be a fixed roof, I believe they're going to have the Vikings type of ETFE roof, which is transparent, lightweight, and durable material. 

In 1965 at the new Astrodome, players complained of having issues seeing the ball and glare with the transparent roof, so they painted it, killing the grass and thus gave us astroturf. While the Rays wont have an issue with a dead playing surface, how are they gonna solve the glare issue?

Signature intentionally left blank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GDAWG said:

 

So it's a renovation deal, not a new stadium?  

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GDAWG said:

they want 40,000+ fans in attendance for all 81 games whether it's night or day.  They couldn't do that with their old ballpark

 

Well that's not really working out for them, as they've averaged around 25k in the first two full years of the park, and 31k this year despite being pretty good.

 

Regarding the old ballpark, WHY DID THEY APPROVE THE DESIGN?  It should be illegal to approve a design, get a park built, then complain that people can't enjoy the park because of the design that THEY CAME UP WITH AND APPROVED, then ask for more money to build a new billion-dollar Costco to play in.

 

I'm no engineer, but I have to believe that there's a way to build stadiums in ways that shade is provided, whether fixed, or with giant-moving arms (like Mr. Burns' sun blocker).  Hell - we're spending $2B on these things, what's the difference?

 

EDIT: their attendance at the new park has actually dropped from the around the last 10 (maybe more) seasons of the old one, so they can screw themselves.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TEX/attend.shtml

 

 

Year Tm Lg W L Finish Playoffs Attendance Attend/G Rank Est. Payroll PPF BPF Stadium
2023 Texas Rangers AL West 82 67 2   2,342,790 31,237 7th of 15 $248,537,867 102 103 Globe Life Field
2022 Texas Rangers AL West 68 94 4   2,011,361 24,832 7th of 15 $120,176,667 101 101 Globe Life Field
2021 Texas Rangers AL West 60 102 5   2,110,258 26,053 1st of 15 $67,890,999 102 100 Globe Life Field
2020 Texas Rangers AL West 22 38 5       14th of 15 $122,326,667 101 99 Globe Life Field
2019 Texas Rangers AL West 78 84 3   2,132,994 26,333 6th of 15 $104,433,499 112 111 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2018 Texas Rangers AL West 67 95 5   2,107,107 26,014 7th of 15 $106,099,628 111 110 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2017 Texas Rangers AL West 78 84 3   2,507,760 30,960 5th of 15 $207,326,274 110 110 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2016 Texas Rangers AL West 95 67 1 Lost ALDS (3-0) 2,710,402 33,462 5th of 15 $212,117,760 108 107 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2015 Texas Rangers AL West 88 74 1 Lost ALDS (3-2) 2,491,875 30,764 7th of 15 $178,860,789 105 105 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2014 Texas Rangers AL West 67 95 5   2,718,733 33,565 5th of 15 $129,801,239 104 104 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2013 Texas Rangers AL West 91 72 2   3,178,273 38,759 2nd of 15 $139,261,200 103 103 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2012 Texas Rangers AL West 93 69 2 Lost ALWC (1-0) 3,460,280 42,720 2nd of 14 $124,119,900 107 109 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2011 Texas Rangers AL West 96 66 1 Lost WS (4-3) 2,946,949 36,382 5th of 14 $93,799,264 108 109 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2010 Texas Rangers AL West 90 72 1 Lost WS (4-1) 2,505,171 30,928 5th of 14 $56,474,374 108 109 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2009 Texas Rangers AL West 87 75 2   2,156,016 26,617 8th of 14 $79,723,548 104 104 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2008 Texas Rangers AL West 79 83 2   1,945,677 24,021 11th of 14 $68,037,326 102 101 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington

 

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GDAWG said:

The reason the Rangers are playing in a Costco Warehouse is because they want 40,000+ fans in attendance for all 81 games whether it's night or day.  They couldn't do that with their old ballpark (which is now a football/soccer stadium for MLS Next Pro North Texas SC, XFL Arlington Renegades and Major League Rugby's Dallas Jackals) because nobody wants to attend a Rangers game when the average temperature on a weekday afternoon in June, July and August is 102.  Even when the Rangers were winning, nobody was in attendance at day games.  


The Rangers didn’t build a fixed roof dome though. They built a retractable roof, just like Houston, Arizona, and Miami. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, spartacat_12 said:


The Rangers didn’t build a fixed roof dome though. They built a retractable roof, just like Houston, Arizona, and Miami. 

 

Good thing they spent the extra money to make it retractable!!

 

 

Idiots.

  • Like 2
  • LOL 1
  • Huh? 1

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dilbert said:

In 1965 at the new Astrodome, players complained of having issues seeing the ball and glare with the transparent roof, so they painted it, killing the grass and thus gave us astroturf. While the Rays wont have an issue with a dead playing surface, how are they gonna solve the glare issue?

Not sure, everything so far is just speculation.  I do know that the University of Minnesota baseball team uses US Bank for their early season home games and I haven't heard of a glare issue there.   It's possible part of the roof can be strategically shielded like the half of US Bank Stadium's roof is.

 

I guess we'll find out more soon enough.

 

usbank1-2000.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just do this:

 

EXuITm0WoAID3pB.jpg

  • LOL 2

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BBTV said:

WHY DID THEY APPROVE THE DESIGN?  It should be illegal to approve a design, get a park built, then complain that people can't enjoy the park because of the design that THEY CAME UP WITH AND APPROVED, then ask for more money to build a new billion-dollar Costco to play in.

 

Bear Down, Chicago Bears...

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BBTV said:

 

Well that's not really working out for them, as they've averaged around 25k in the first two full years of the park, and 31k this year despite being pretty good.

 

Regarding the old ballpark, WHY DID THEY APPROVE THE DESIGN?  It should be illegal to approve a design, get a park built, then complain that people can't enjoy the park because of the design that THEY CAME UP WITH AND APPROVED, then ask for more money to build a new billion-dollar Costco to play in.

 

I'm no engineer, but I have to believe that there's a way to build stadiums in ways that shade is provided, whether fixed, or with giant-moving arms (like Mr. Burns' sun blocker).  Hell - we're spending $2B on these things, what's the difference?

 

EDIT: their attendance at the new park has actually dropped from the around the last 10 (maybe more) seasons of the old one, so they can screw themselves.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TEX/attend.shtml

 

 

Year Tm Lg W L Finish Playoffs Attendance Attend/G Rank Est. Payroll PPF BPF Stadium
2023 Texas Rangers AL West 82 67 2   2,342,790 31,237 7th of 15 $248,537,867 102 103 Globe Life Field
2022 Texas Rangers AL West 68 94 4   2,011,361 24,832 7th of 15 $120,176,667 101 101 Globe Life Field
2021 Texas Rangers AL West 60 102 5   2,110,258 26,053 1st of 15 $67,890,999 102 100 Globe Life Field
2020 Texas Rangers AL West 22 38 5       14th of 15 $122,326,667 101 99 Globe Life Field
2019 Texas Rangers AL West 78 84 3   2,132,994 26,333 6th of 15 $104,433,499 112 111 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2018 Texas Rangers AL West 67 95 5   2,107,107 26,014 7th of 15 $106,099,628 111 110 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2017 Texas Rangers AL West 78 84 3   2,507,760 30,960 5th of 15 $207,326,274 110 110 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2016 Texas Rangers AL West 95 67 1 Lost ALDS (3-0) 2,710,402 33,462 5th of 15 $212,117,760 108 107 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2015 Texas Rangers AL West 88 74 1 Lost ALDS (3-2) 2,491,875 30,764 7th of 15 $178,860,789 105 105 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2014 Texas Rangers AL West 67 95 5   2,718,733 33,565 5th of 15 $129,801,239 104 104 Globe Life Park in Arlington
2013 Texas Rangers AL West 91 72 2   3,178,273 38,759 2nd of 15 $139,261,200 103 103 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2012 Texas Rangers AL West 93 69 2 Lost ALWC (1-0) 3,460,280 42,720 2nd of 14 $124,119,900 107 109 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2011 Texas Rangers AL West 96 66 1 Lost WS (4-3) 2,946,949 36,382 5th of 14 $93,799,264 108 109 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2010 Texas Rangers AL West 90 72 1 Lost WS (4-1) 2,505,171 30,928 5th of 14 $56,474,374 108 109 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2009 Texas Rangers AL West 87 75 2   2,156,016 26,617 8th of 14 $79,723,548 104 104 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington
2008 Texas Rangers AL West 79 83 2   1,945,677 24,021 11th of 14 $68,037,326 102 101 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington

 

 

It's the same city that used taxpayer money to pay for the Jerry Dome across the street, so it wasn't a surprise the city of Arlington accepted.  One thing is for sure, they may have the Cowboys and Rangers, but the city of Arlington will not get the Mavericks and Stars.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.